[butlerweave]

Electoral College members are there to do a job and not steal elections

[timestax]

bttt

[BenLurkin]

Well it’s not like the “Death to America” crowd will find them, doxx them, and threaten their family if they refused to vote for the Democrat Party candidate.

Right?

[JPJones]

This is a setup.

[chris37]

Apparently there is no point in my vote for president then.

Gotcha.

Problems incoming real damn soon.

[headstamp 2]

[[[A U.S. appeals court in Denver said Electoral College members can vote for the presidential candidate of their choice and aren’t bound by the popular vote in their states.]]]

And this isn’t disenfranchisement how?

[dragonblustar]

The left will do everything they can to destroy this country. God help us!

[MHGinTN]

The anti-American demon rats must hurry this to the SCOTUS before the treacherous John Roberts is no longer the deciding vote. Ruthie ‘twelve should be legal age for girls’ Ginsberg cannot slink along much longer, so the court profile will be dramatically altered when she is replaced during Trump’s FIRST term.

[VanDeKoik]

Am I off here....because hasn’t this always been the case?

[bert]

Damn, just damn. Doesn’t majority rule? /s

[Zathras]

The Supreme Court will do a smackdown on this one.
There is no point to voting then.
Let CA, NY, TX and FL pick all our future Presidents.

Can the rest of us leave the USA?

[Celerity]

Still not tired of winning .

Are you guys?

[PGalt]

Post/comments BUMP!

[Skywise]

That’s a win baby!

This invalidates all the state laws that say their votes go to the popular vote winner.

[madison10]

The “court” cannot decide this.

[ealgeone]

I think that has been the case previously.

[therut]

Well, the Dems who gave passed state laws forcing their electors to cast a vote for the nation wide overall vote winner may not like this?

[ScottfromNJ]

“DENVER — A U.S. appeals court in Denver said Electoral College members can vote for the presidential candidate of their choice and aren’t bound by the popular vote in their states.”

My take on this is an elector isn’t bound by the national popular vote either then, bad news for the national popular vote compact.

[Theoria]

Citizens do not have the right to vote for electors, who in turn are not obligated to vote in the peoples’ interest.

[DoodleDawg]

"Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress."- Article II, Section 1.

That would seem to me to say that a state can remove an elector who does it actin it the manner that the state legislature directed.