Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw Explains His Support for ‘Red Flag Laws’
Breitbart ^ | 11 Aug 2019 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 08/11/2019 7:19:55 PM PDT by SanchoP

Crenshaw said, “Clearly, when we said ‘Red Flag Laws’ you guys stop listening, you can’t hear what we are suggesting, because understandably you automatically assume that we are just agreeing with the left’s version of that law. And we all know the left’s version would not be good, it would not protect due process.”

Crenshaw continued, “At its heart what we are talking about is the ability to confiscate weapons where there is evidence that violence is about to be committed. It’s that simple, and this isn’t that controversial.”

He went on to explain that everything turns on due process and how due process would be protected under the type of Red Flag Laws Crenshaw supports. He suggested the difference between what he supports and the left’s “blatantly unconstitutional laws” all boils down to how due process is protected.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 116th; 2ndamendment; backpedal; banglist; crenshaw; dancrenshaw; guncontrol; nra; redflag; redflaglaws; redflagpolitician; rino; secondamendment; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last
Crenshaw is a glaring example of:"You can't fix stupid."
1 posted on 08/11/2019 7:19:55 PM PDT by SanchoP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

Et tu, Danno?


2 posted on 08/11/2019 7:21:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

It will inevitably become the left’s version within years, if not months. Not giving an inch.


3 posted on 08/11/2019 7:21:03 PM PDT by ilgipper (The mob only destroys. Never creates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

But he has such a cool eye patch!


4 posted on 08/11/2019 7:22:49 PM PDT by MuttTheHoople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP
At its heart what we are talking about is the ability to confiscate weapons

"Shall not be infringed", Danny-boy.

Your oath to protect and defend the Constitution has not expired. You're becoming one of those "domestic enemies" your oath mentioned.

5 posted on 08/11/2019 7:23:31 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

I don’t understand why we keep having gun “conversations” on the left’s terms. I’ll listen to the “red flag” argument when it’s bootstrapped to national CCW permit reciprocity. Watch how fast the “conversation” is dropped then.


6 posted on 08/11/2019 7:25:12 PM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

Someone needs to ask Rep Crenshaw if Red Flag laws would make it less likely that fellow vets would seek help for mental health issues (knowing that their gun might be taken).


7 posted on 08/11/2019 7:25:13 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

Traitor.


8 posted on 08/11/2019 7:25:18 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP
what we are talking about is the ability to confiscate weapons where there is evidence that violence is about to be committed. It’s that simple, and this isn’t that controversial.

Let's ask the precogs about how that worked out.


9 posted on 08/11/2019 7:25:20 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP
...where there is evidence that violence is about to be committed.

So you're clairvoyant now?

10 posted on 08/11/2019 7:27:49 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP
Crenshaw continued, “At its heart what we are talking about is the ability to confiscate weapons where there is evidence that violence is about to be committed. It’s that simple, and this isn’t that controversial”.

Evidence? What evidence, how is it collected in advance of a crime being committed (or not) and by whom? Who gets to determine due process? A star chamber? A DA with a reputation to make? Some gun grabbing activist judge?

All I see is a steep slippery slope with the incline properties of a cliff. And to think this guy had promise. Just another swamp critter.

11 posted on 08/11/2019 7:28:50 PM PDT by TADSLOS (You know why you can enjoy a day at the Zoo? Because walls work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

Eets booosheet senor Dan.


12 posted on 08/11/2019 7:28:50 PM PDT by onona (Mexico is a parasite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

Oh Christ! Maybe his time on SNL turned him into a candy ass.


13 posted on 08/11/2019 7:29:02 PM PDT by lionstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Crenshaw is Sasse with prior military service. I’ve not been a fan since he was gratuitously attacking POTUS during campaign season. I expect he’ll do the same in 2020.


14 posted on 08/11/2019 7:29:08 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

Dan, you probably haven’t been in the hunt that long, so let me bring this up.

Leftist prosecutors bring charges before Leftist courts. Women seeking custody of children and gaming divorce litigation, also come before Leftist courts.

How much due process do you think a Conservative man will get from those courts, who already think Conservative men are White Supremacist KKK acolytes?

Good luck with your not-Left ideas. They’re going to be stripped right out from under you.

Background checks, okay. Confiscations, you better write some very very stiff language in there. And after you have, you just watch how long it takes the Left to replace it after the fact.


15 posted on 08/11/2019 7:29:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

It’s very simple. If you’re safe to move around freely in society, your God-given right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The threshold for infringing on that right must be identical to the threshold for incarceration/institutionalization.


16 posted on 08/11/2019 7:30:30 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

This shouldn’t be about “confiscation” at all.

It should be about locking up the 7%.


17 posted on 08/11/2019 7:32:14 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER ( "The Owl" eats RATs for breakfast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

I am not a Crenshaw fan.


18 posted on 08/11/2019 7:32:32 PM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP
...where there is evidence that violence is about to be committed.

Sorry, Dan, no sale. What "evidence" are we talking about here? An anonymous phone call? A restraining order which the defendant can't contest? A list of NRA members sent in from a friendly local gun control group? What "evidence"? And what recourse does the defendant have if the charges are bogus and the court still won't give him or her the property back? A ruinously expensive lawsuit taking months or more? A "buyback" consisting of a $100 Starbucks card? Dan, buddy, we're suspicious because our opponents are liars and crooks. And you know it.

19 posted on 08/11/2019 7:34:29 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor

Excellent point but

The left is still controlling the narrative and the timing of getting Trump re-elected is more important.

Flame me if you want but I think Crenshaw is retreating to a position of strength.


20 posted on 08/11/2019 7:35:01 PM PDT by jcon40 (The other post before yours really nails it for me. I have been a DOithS / PC guy forever and alway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson