Skip to comments.
CNN’s Cuomo: 2nd Amendment Didn’t Mean ‘Individual Right’ to Bear Arms ‘Until Scalia Read It In’
www.breitbart.com ^
| 8 Aug 2019
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 08/08/2019 10:29:47 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
The 'Stupid Gene' must be huge in the Cuomo family..............
To: Red Badger
First headline of the day that made me
LOL, LOL, LOL....A LOT
To: Red Badger
What a dipshit. How does that guy even have enough neurons to move his diaphragm? “Brain”stem, I guess.
3
posted on
08/08/2019 10:33:42 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Red Badger
He knows his audience won't check him.
Heck, the Heller decision lays the historical meaning out fairly accurately. The "collective right" theory is new by corrupt judges.
At any rate, Cuomo is a known liar, and few people take him at his word. He works for a lying propaganda outfit to boot.
4
posted on
08/08/2019 10:34:13 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Red Badger
His interpretation is laughable. A “collective right” to bear arms needs no Constitutional protection. Is the government in any danger of having its weapons taken away, by the government?
To: Red Badger
6
posted on
08/08/2019 10:34:27 AM PDT
by
Tell It Right
(1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: Still Thinking
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
7
posted on
08/08/2019 10:34:40 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
To: Red Badger
He had trouble with “See Spot run”.
8
posted on
08/08/2019 10:35:21 AM PDT
by
o-n-money
To: Red Badger
An Italian commenting on another Italian who was 100x superior to him in every way.
Thank goodness for the Scalias and Alitos to offset the likes of cuomo and pelosi
9
posted on
08/08/2019 10:35:27 AM PDT
by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
To: Red Badger
Lets accept his silly argument as valid. I thought lefties were all wrapped up about honoring precedent. Well, if the Supreme Court declared it, that’s precedent too isn’t it? Or does that only apply to Roe V Wade?
10
posted on
08/08/2019 10:36:01 AM PDT
by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: Red Badger
They’re not stupid. They’re lying, they know that they’re lying, and they think they can get away with it.
11
posted on
08/08/2019 10:36:03 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: Red Badger
The 'Stupid Gene' must be huge in the Cuomo family. For years, Rush Limbaugh has referred to him as "Fredo."
12
posted on
08/08/2019 10:36:09 AM PDT
by
abb
("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
To: Red Badger
After all, I visited Montpelier this past May.
13
posted on
08/08/2019 10:36:20 AM PDT
by
OttawaFreeper
("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966)
To: NorthMountain
Theyre lying, they know that theyre lying, and they think they can get away with it. The epitome of 'stupid'......................
14
posted on
08/08/2019 10:36:31 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
To: Red Badger
Nowhere in the contract called the constitution is a militia recognized as a party to the contract. We only see states and individuals and their representatives.
15
posted on
08/08/2019 10:37:01 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: Red Badger
BS as anybody who has read any of a number of statements by practically all of the Founding Fathers knows.
As usual, Cuomo is just lying.
16
posted on
08/08/2019 10:37:02 AM PDT
by
FLT-bird
To: Red Badger; Army Air Corps; MeganC; SkyDancer
That twisted logic has so many fallacies in it we could spend all day picking it apart.
Basically why would The Founders want to make sure something is "Well Regulated" (to the stupid Progs that means, regulated as in what you can/cannot possess) but then at the very end state that the Government cannot infringe (i.e. limit) the Arms of the people.
17
posted on
08/08/2019 10:37:05 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
To: abb
I don’t know what that means..................
18
posted on
08/08/2019 10:37:07 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain......................)
To: Red Badger
"you have no basis for thinking you and not the state controls access. "talk about reading in stuff
19
posted on
08/08/2019 10:38:52 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Red Badger
Hardly
he thinks he can get a critical mass of American people to believe his lies
such belief may gain him and his masters power, for which they lust above all else. Dishonest propaganda is a proven avenue to power for evil people.
It’s as “stupid” as the devil himself.
(In the long run, I suppose it is stupid. Eternity in Hell is a high price to pay for worldly power
)
20
posted on
08/08/2019 10:40:03 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson