Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump to Unveil Executive Action on Census Citizenship Question
Breitbart ^ | 07-11-19 | Breitbart News

Posted on 07/11/2019 10:30:34 AM PDT by Steve1999

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is expected to announce new executive action Thursday during a news conference on the 2020 census and his push to include a citizenship question. Trump tweeted Thursday morning that he planned “a News Conference on the Census and Citizenship” after a White House Social Media Summit. A senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to preview the plans, said the president would be announcing new action, but the official did not elaborate. Trump said last week that he was “very seriously” considering executive action to try to force the question’s inclusion, and that it was among four or five options he’d been weighing.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bot; census; citizenshipquestion; trump

1 posted on 07/11/2019 10:30:34 AM PDT by Steve1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

Just do it.


2 posted on 07/11/2019 10:31:28 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

That’s great.

By the way, how’s that ICE sweep thing shaping up?


3 posted on 07/11/2019 10:32:15 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

An interesting ploy. In the lawsuit, the issue became whether the department was being forthcoming in their reasons for requesting it.

Now, the President will have his own reasons for doing so, by executive order, and surely as President he is in charge of the commerce department, and can have them put the question in.

And it SHOULD require a NEW lawsuit to be filed, one that claims the President does not have the authority under the law to have his department do this.


4 posted on 07/11/2019 10:33:31 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

Section 2 of the 14th Amendment requires that the government know the number of male citizens. Justification enough for the question as well as male / female question.


5 posted on 07/11/2019 10:38:46 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

The court said adding the ? was constitutional.

It should just be put in as planned and Trump can email Roberts an explanation.


6 posted on 07/11/2019 10:38:52 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“And it SHOULD require a NEW lawsuit to be filed, one that claims the President does not have the authority under the law to have his department do this.”

Interesting that you used the word “required.” Do you think a lawsuit SHOULD be filed? I’m sure one (or more) will, but I’m wondering if you think the action would be an appropriate use of Presidential power.


7 posted on 07/11/2019 10:39:28 AM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

Let the courts enforce their edicts. They have no enforcement power whatsoever. The Executive and Judicial branches are co equal. It’s time for the Judiciary to understand that. Just announce the question will be on the census forms and move on.


8 posted on 07/11/2019 10:48:53 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“And it SHOULD require a NEW lawsuit to be filed, one that claims the President does not have the authority under the law to have his department do this.”

How did Obama get the question removed?


9 posted on 07/11/2019 10:52:14 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump is President and CEO of America, Inc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999
Go get 'em Mr President
10 posted on 07/11/2019 10:54:42 AM PDT by BigEdLB (BigEdLB, Russian BOT, At your service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

If he announces this plan Thursday afternoon the challenges will be filed in court by Friday morning.


11 posted on 07/11/2019 10:58:53 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
The word "male" was superceded by the 19th amendment, but otherwise correct.

I would think that by citing the 14th amendment as the authority, this would prevent lower courts from blocking it, as they are creations of Congress and inferior to the Constitution.

Only the Supreme Court should have jurisdiction when the Constitution is cited directly by the President.

-PJ

12 posted on 07/11/2019 11:00:06 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Even if you strike out “male”, the “citizen” portion remains in the 14th, Section 2


13 posted on 07/11/2019 11:04:11 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Absolutely.

-PJ

14 posted on 07/11/2019 11:11:20 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

What is confusing to me is WHY SCOTUS didn’t say - Your justification is crap, should have used this one, but approved anyway.


15 posted on 07/11/2019 11:29:19 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steve1999

America needs to decide if it wants to be a country or the world’s toilet bowl.


16 posted on 07/11/2019 11:33:04 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
They knew Trump had the law on his site. Their only tool was to try to delay it for another 10 years by remanding it.

-PJ

17 posted on 07/11/2019 11:34:31 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
What is confusing to me is WHY SCOTUS didn’t say - Your justification is crap, should have used this one, but approved anyway.

--Hugs & Kisses,
  Chief Justice Roberts

18 posted on 07/11/2019 12:36:43 PM PDT by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson