Skip to comments.Dr. Christine Blasey Fraud
Posted on 07/10/2019 2:27:12 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: Christine Blasey Ford scrubbed social media profile before sending letter detailing alleged sexual assault. As we all knew, there was nothing genuine or real about anything involving Christine Blasey Ford. The whole thing was a manufactured setup that was executed after immense detailed planning and coordination with the Democrat Party. And the truth has been revealed.
RUSH: So lets go to from there to Americas number one victim of men, Christine Blasey Ford. The universe the left asks us to occupy with them, on the same day, on one hand we have all of these great female champions who are willing to throw that aside and become political victims, enraged and angry over the unfairness of it all, demanding this and demanding that and hoping to be the reason to get rid of Donald Trump
To Christine Blasey Ford, a 54-year-old woman who sounded like she was 12, describing an event that had happened 30 years ago as though it had happened that morning and she was still scared to death and in shock over it. (imitating Ford) Im terrified to be here, you know, what happened to me shouldnt happen to anyone, you know. That was Christine Blasey Ford Severino.
Story here from the Washington Examiner, headline: Christine Blasey Ford Scrubbed Social Media Profile Before Sending Letter Detailing Alleged Sexual Assault, by Kavanaugh. Now, you go back to last summer when this happened and lets be honest, folks you and I, most of you, we all knew that this was a totally contrived event.
It was manufactured to be executed at the last minute if it appeared they werent able to stop Kavanaugh any other way. If it looked like Kavanaugh was gonna sail through and get confirmed, theyre gonna launch this. It was a rehearsed campaign. It was strategized, and it was orchestrated and planned.
There were people involved, Dianne Feinsteins office and Dr. Blasey Fords congressional representative and some people she had known from her past, and they concocted this event. They created this alleged sexual assault that he had committed against her and then Avenatti got in on it and blew the whole thing sky-high by claiming that a client of his had been forced to run rape trains for Kavanaugh.
The whole thing fell apart because, as always, they overreach. But they made it all up. As we suspected, this thing was a contrived event that was planned to the minute and orchestrated with leaders of the Democrats on that Judiciary Committee, and I have no doubt that certain elements of the media were party to the planning and execution of this hit piece on Kavanaugh. The details here come in a new book, Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court.
Its written by Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino. Mollie Hemingway is a great writer, terrific author. Shes at The Federalist. And this book has immediately become number one on the New York Times list, Amazon and some others.
Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who accused Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, deleted her social media profile weeks before she sent a letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein detailing the allegation, according to a new book.
According to the book, Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court, set for release Tuesday its out the book details how Blasey Ford was portrayed as politically moderate, minding her own business out there on the Left Coast teaching women how to be victims with the best of them. Teaching them how to be angry, how to be victims, minding her own business and one day she sees this guy who nearly abused her on TV and she lost it.
And she wrote a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, she could barely finish the letter, it was so traumatic, this guy is horrible. Except there were no witnesses, she couldnt describe exactly where it had happened, she couldnt describe how she got home after it happened, there were no witnesses that saw it.
In fact, some people who were there say it didnt happen, but it didnt stop anybody. It details how Ford was portrayed as politically moderate. But her acquaintances reported Fords profile on social media had been notable for its extreme antipathy to President Trump.
Shes another Trump hater. Christine Blasey Ford hated Trump, but they scrubbed all of that from her social media before she sent the letter so that any media, Who is this babe? would find out that shes just an average American woman traumatized because she was forced to interact with a man who is now being nominated to the Supreme Court.
They constructed a totally bogus history and set of circumstances. They constructed a totally bogus identity of a woman as somebody who was apolitical who really only cared about was the salmon safe, and now shes coming forward as a duty to her country to keep a sexual abuser off of the Supreme Court. And she was risking everything: humiliation, her privacy.
eople who knew her, some who knew her quite well.
Classmates were surprised by the medias portrayal of her as an ingenue, which was very different from how they remembered her in junior high and high school, according to the book. Female classmates and friends at area schools recalled a heavy drinker who was much more aggressive with boys than they were.
And yet they portrayed Dr. Ford as basically a waif, a highly educated, almost asexual brilliant female working in her specialty, teaching other young women the ways of the world. She was mouse-like, invisible, very seldom made waves, so invisible that hardly anybody remembered much about her.
Thats the story they tried to create, but her friends, This babe was all over the place. You tap a keg and she got first dibs on the thing. And she was running around chasing the guys like you wouldnt believe. But all of that was erased, all of that was eliminated and a phony picture was created, made to look like all of it was spontaneous. The book is Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court, by Mollie Hemingway, Carrie Severino.
There’s also something I just had pointed out to me that I never noticed while it was happening. The way she wore her her hair under her glasses. Looked like she never wore glasses before.
In that photo, she is giving the same sneaky smirk that Peter Strzok when he testified to Congress.
“Mollie Hemingway is a great writer, terrific author. “
Hemingway is excellent. Love seeing her on TV. She knows what she’s talking about and has an unusually clear perspective on what’s really going on. Very smart.
It would take me hours to list the obvious holes and contradictions in her story ... but the one that had me laughing my ass off is that she knew how old she was when the alleged incident occurred, but she didnt know what year it was. LMAO.
Yes, there were all kinds of rumors swirling around her to the effect that she did not keep her panties on!
A slut, indeed!
Did Rush mention anything about CBF’s family history and her work recruiting CIA interns at Stanford? I first heard about this on George Webb’s excellent youtube channel in real time while the hearings were going on. Crickets from all our “trusted sources” including Rush. Here is one written source searching for the truth.
Note that ALL BUT ONE Republican voted for her, including all but one RINO.
Every other RINO VOTED FOR HER. Think about that for a minute - the RINOs we hate so much (with the one exception here) have a 90% track record on Trump’s judges. Not a single Democrat EVEN COMES CLOSE (in fact, I doubt there’s a single one who’s sided with us on any contested vote - they only vote with us, sometimes, when the guy is going to be confirmed anyway).
And one more thing, when Collins did her “I need more time” bit (sisterhood crap), it meant that the Republicans only had 49 votes, until Collins got her way and finally voted for him. Had Roy Moore actually won in Alabama, Collins wouldn’t have mattered - SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN OUTVOTED. Had ONE OTHER Republican made it to the Senate, even with Moore losing, Collins wouldn’t have mattered, she would have been outvoted again.
So, perhaps we ‘principled’ FReepers who sit out elections because so-and-so Republican is a RINO who said bad things about Trump should be the ones to BLAME. Because all it would have taken was a few thousand people like us to hold their noses in November 2016, or November 2014, and we would have had that one extra seat, and this entire circus WOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED.
...and by the way, letting Dems win in November only gives them POWER, it doesn’t do a damn thing to reform the GOPe, that has to be done in the Primaries, and ONLY in the Primaries.
What really convinced me that she was a fraud was all “the need” for a second door stuff
Then you find out she added a second door and rented the room out, added a second door and turned it into an office. Then a guy she use to live with came forward and said that she NEVER said anything about this.
The rats started this kind of accusation stuff with Clarence Thomas 28 years ago and is still going strong. They have been covering up for all their true sexual predators since Kennedy.
I have no idea, as I don’t listen to Rush (or any other talk show host. All I do is read his transcripts and than post them.
I agree with your general point, but I would not have counted on Roy Moore to vote for Kavanaugh. As ludicrous as this may sound, I could easily envision a scenario where Moore opposed Kavanaugh over some judicial decision by Kavanaugh ... or even over some sanctimonious nonsense about underage drinking.
I don’t get your post about that all but one Republican voted for her. Voted for her for what, and why? Please explain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.