To: robowombat
How do you prove discrimination based on hairstyle?
2 posted on
07/06/2019 8:22:55 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Capitalism produces EVERYTHING Socialists/Communists/Democratic-Socialists wish to "redistribute.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
WELL YOU SEE...
Who the #$## knows??
CA lost its collective mind a while ago.
Hard to believe 35 years ago they voted for Reagan.
Change like this should take 100 years.
4 posted on
07/06/2019 8:25:04 PM PDT by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This opens a can of worms. Everyone has a hairstyle, therefore, now everyone is a protected class. Even those without hair.
5 posted on
07/06/2019 8:26:10 PM PDT by
coloradan
(The Enemy Media isn't chartered to inform but rather to advance the interests of certain elites.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
7 posted on
07/06/2019 8:29:09 PM PDT by
Ezekiel
(The pun is mightier than the s-word.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They probably don’t have to prove it. All they have to do is show up for an interview. If they don’t get the job all they have to do is threaten a lawsuit. This would be “Sharptonian intimidation”.
8 posted on
07/06/2019 8:35:29 PM PDT by
immadashell
(Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is really for black people who wear dreadlocks or afros. At least when saw info on it and they had the above referenced yapping about being disenfranchised because of their do’s.
Poor brown and black people always hassled woe is me.
33 posted on
07/06/2019 11:23:26 PM PDT by
funfan
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It means employers cannot fire someone for a dress code involving hair.
The hippy-dippy look must be allowed.
59 posted on
07/07/2019 6:30:31 AM PDT by
CodeToad
( Hating on Trump is hating on me and Americans!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
