Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vimeo Removes "Hateful, Defamatory, and Discriminatory" Veritas Google Video
Reddit ^ | 6-26-2019 | Project Veritas

Posted on 06/26/2019 3:11:29 PM PDT by tcrlaf

BREAKING @Vimeo has REMOVED Project Veritas saying: "You cannot upload videos that are hateful, defamatory, or discriminatory."

Perhaps we embarrassed @Google but NOTHING we said was hateful, defamatory, or discriminatory. They're trying to erase us from the internet.

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1984; google; veritas; vimeo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: bigbob

In a capitalist society, companies also do not get special gov protections, government venture capital money, etc. They also don’t have private meetings with government leaders and execute censorship policies on their behalf as a sheep dip to let the government feign innocence

They aren’t completely “private” it turns out.


21 posted on 06/26/2019 3:31:48 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
In before “Private company, can do what they want” post.

Who would want to trust the GOVERNMENT - you know, the same people who bring your the DMV and the EPA and every other error-prone public sector operation - to get THIS right?

Private action always responds more quickly, is more vicious, and more efficient, than the courts. And with less bias.

Frankly the REAL problem isn't the lack of government intervention (because that ALWAYS works) but all the alleged conservatives who keep using these statist tools. Take a browser...Duck Duck Go and others provide great alternatives. No need for a VC firms to set up a competitor. If the 63 million Trump voters switched today, Google would lose their minds.

22 posted on 06/26/2019 3:36:02 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

This is the first I’ve heard of Vimeo. Never heard of it.


23 posted on 06/26/2019 3:40:39 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

I did, however, reister my opinion...

“I recently read an article describing how Vimeo Staff removed Project Veritas for posting a video of a Google Exec describing it’s practices concerning the upcoming 2020 Presidential election and their internal plans to moderate it.

The reason given being it violated Vimeo guidelines by being “hateful, defamatory and or discriminatory”.

I personally watched the entire video and observed nothing contained in it even remotely resembling any of those criteria.

Please explain.”


24 posted on 06/26/2019 3:41:46 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
It is a private comapny and they can remove whatever they like..

I no longer believe that for the case in which a company controls mass communications. I think communications needs to be regarded as a special case where private property cannot be used as a backdoor method for censoring significant amounts of public speech.

I think we need a special exception to "private property" when it deals with carrying public communications. Would we have ever allowed AT&T to censor people on the basis of their speech?

Same thing with internet communications.

Prove that it is- TAKE THEM TO COURT veritas!!!!

They may not be able to do that. A lot of these end user license agreements are basically legal contracts that says the company can do whatever the f*** it wants, and if you don't like it, too bad for you!

25 posted on 06/26/2019 3:42:53 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no o<ither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

I wonder who gets to define “hateful”.


26 posted on 06/26/2019 3:48:53 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (A joke: Comey,Brennan and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob
Your argument is consistent with theoretical libertarian principles, and perhaps in a future utopia that approach would work and solve all issues of discrimination.

But we are in the real world of government involved capitalism where government regulations pervade the business and private worlds. So changing those regulations, and using the existing structures is vital to short term progress.

When we have the liberal government colluding with private businesses, and some of those businesses colluding among themselves for political reasons, your solutions are not practical.

Will you really be so eager to stick to your "keep government out" plan if you find yourself unable to open a bank account, or unable to use Paypal? And then you say, OK, I'll open a new kind of bank. But you can't, because you find a set of regulations limiting what you can do, and then you find you can't offer credit or debit cards either since the various companies involved in that won't do business with you. Oh, and you can't just decide to make a new kind of money either. So how does your plan work?

27 posted on 06/26/2019 3:50:42 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Any doubt Vimeo was told to get it’s mind right by Google?


28 posted on 06/26/2019 3:53:09 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
I noted the replies to your post.

They were right. They don't need to grow a pair, you need to grow a brain.

29 posted on 06/26/2019 3:56:34 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Trump. He stands for the great issues of the day. Stay the course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Dear Project Veritas,

Your account has been banned for posting video containing investigative journalism. This is against our standards policy.


30 posted on 06/26/2019 3:58:45 PM PDT by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

All this whining and pissing and moaning about the media companies started by lefties and used for their benefit is frankly nauseating.

*************

They are more than just media companies. They are also acting as political advocates who provide substantial in kind benefits to the Democrat Party. There are regulations and laws that govern such things and they are clearly violating them.


31 posted on 06/26/2019 3:59:22 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EasySt

last line...

“You remember that time we trusted Greta with the Code book?”

HAHAHAHA!


32 posted on 06/26/2019 4:04:20 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
If reporting Google’s policy and actions is “hateful, defamatory, or discriminatory”, doesn't that mean that Google was being “ hateful, defamatory, or discriminatory” ?
33 posted on 06/26/2019 4:05:38 PM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

This has been the “liberal” way for some time now.

Since they can’t make arguments that make any sense, can’t argue from a position of facts, logic, and reason, they just shut any dissent down.

Luckily, Republicans in Congress are johnny on the spot in tackling these outrageous assaults on our liberty. Wait, never mind.


34 posted on 06/26/2019 4:06:01 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

The way it works in a capitalist society is, if you don’t like the products or services being offered by others, you start a company of your own and offer a better alternative.

All this whining and pissing and moaning about the media companies started by lefties and used for their benefit is frankly nauseating. Knock it off and grow a pair.


Dude. You have NO CLUE what you are talking about.


35 posted on 06/26/2019 4:07:44 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

got you. So a company can monopolize and control political speech and conspire to control the information tens of millions receive about elections.

good stuff!


36 posted on 06/26/2019 4:14:18 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Thanks for your very explanatory post.

So, is the answer, then, for Congress to declare these tech companies as platforms? And, uphold them to censoring laws, like other platform companies are subject to?


37 posted on 06/26/2019 4:16:21 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing

and you can’t just decide to make a new kind of money either. _________________________

But FB _can_ make a new kind of money. So why can one *private company* create a crypto currency that will obviously give them even more control as a *private company*, but conservatives cannot?

A note on the takedown of the Verital video: I believe they are claiming that a hidden camera is deceptive.


38 posted on 06/26/2019 4:21:54 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

https://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399712

Louis Gohmert posted it to his House page.

Some Republicans are doing something.


39 posted on 06/26/2019 4:24:46 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

errata: Verital=Veritas


40 posted on 06/26/2019 4:28:40 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson