A veterans memorial located in Bladensburg, Maryland.
Posted on 06/20/2019 8:02:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a 40-foot tall cross erected on public property in Maryland does not violate the Establishment Clause of the Constitution.
In a decision released Thursday morning, the high court ruled in American Legion v. American Humanist Association that a cross in Bladensburg meant to honor World War I soldiers did not have to removed, overturning a lower court decision.
Justice Samuel Alito authored most of the multi-part majority opinion, being joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer, and Brett Kavanaugh joined. Justice Clarence Thomas filed a concurring opinion, while Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.
Justice Alito wrote that while “the cross has long been a preeminent Christian symbol, its use in the Bladensburg memorial has a special significance.”
“For nearly a century, the Bladensburg Cross has expressed the community’s grief at the loss of the young men who perished, its thanks for their sacrifice, and its dedication to the ideals for which they fought. It has become a prominent community landmark, and its removal or radical alteration at this date would be seen by many not as a neutral act but as the manifestation of ‘a hostility toward religion that has no place in our Establishment Clause traditions,’” said Alito.
“… there is no evidence of discriminatory intent in the selection of the design of the memorial or the decision of a Maryland commission to maintain it. The Religion Clauses of the Constitution aim to foster a society in which people of all beliefs can live together harmoniously, and the presence of the Bladensburg Cross on the land where it has stood for so many years is fully consistent with that aim.”
In her dissent, Justice Ginsburg argued that the cross was unconstitutional, stating that “using the cross as a war memorial does not transform it into a secular symbol.”
“Just as a Star of David is not suitable to honor Christians who died serving their country, so a cross is not suitable to honor those of other faiths who died defending their nation,” wrote Ginsburg.
“By maintaining the Peace Cross on a public highway, the Commission elevates Christianity over other faiths, and religion over nonreligion.”
In 2012, the American Humanist Association sent a letter to the Maryland National Park and Planning Commission demanding that the Bladensburg Cross be removed.
After the Commission refused to do so, the AHA sued them on behalf of two members who lived in the area as well as a third individual from Beltsville.
U.S. District Judge Deborah K. Chasanow ruled in November 2015 that the cross was constitutional, arguing that it fulfilled a secular purpose of honoring fallen American soldiers.
AHA appealed the decision and in October 2017, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2–1 in favor of removing the cross. In March 2018, the Fourth Circuit voted 8-6 to reject an appeal in the case.
Last November, the Supreme Court agreed to hear oral arguments over the Bladensburg Cross, consolidating the two cases of American Legion, et al. v. American Humanist Association and Maryland-National Capital Park v. American Humanist Association, et al.
Too bad, Justice Ginsbarf. You just had to come out of your coffin to tell us your anti-American opinion.
The Cross stays up.
But the stature of Ginsburg and the wise Latino falls low.
“in October 2017, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2–1 in favor of removing the cross”
.........
More work needed here by President Trump. A makeover of this court is sorely needed.
I continue to hold that atheism is a form of religion, one end of the diety spectrum - that there isn’t one (contrast eith polythiesm). Therefore the purge of all things religious is in fact attempting to establish atheism as the national religion.
She’ll know, soon enough. Her epitaph will be “exit, stage left.”
I don’t see Justice Gorsuch name anywhere. I wonder how he voted or did he not vote?
Atheism is a belief system based on faith that there is no G-d.
There are both Crosses and Star of David in our national military cemetery’s - must they too be removed Ginsburg?
A cross that says valor standing tall among pansies...
He authored a concurring opinion. He criticizes the concept of the offended observer and would have held that suits like this should be dismissed for lack of standing. He’s 100% correct, IMO, and it’s a shame his view didn’t prevail, but at least this decision went the right way in general.
Gorsuch voted with the majority.
FROM HUFFINGTON POST:
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote his own concurring opinion, yet joined another concurring opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch.
That should now protect every cross on public land in America. Now add those mayors, congress critters and other political animals who opposed this to the list of pols that need to be defeated next year.
I think I’m glad the ruling went the way it went. I am concerned however that Ginsberg has a valid point. I would prefer that a Star of David not mark my grave. The fact is however that in our day and time as in the last 200 plus years of our country the cross has meant more than Christianity, although it can certainly mean that. Was there a section in the cemetery for various religions?
I would never be in favor of removing the Cross, Star of David or Crescent but if I was a Jew and there was only a Cross I might be inclined to complain that I too need a marker.
For war heroes. I hate people sometimes & I try to never use that word.
Ginsburg and Sotomayor. Gee, I sort of makes one want to root for cancer and diabetes to do their worst—and soon.
Yes...Great news...
These are the types of rulings the LEFT truly feared, (not abortion)... With a constructionalist court the insane rulings from the late 50s and 60s that created the “freedom from religion” nonsense will be overturned, and once they are, the left starts to lose the playing field, and they know it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.