Posted on 06/13/2019 10:43:36 AM PDT by Kaslin
Once the interview with George Stephanopoulos aired, showing President Trump saying “I think I’d take it,” regarding foreign governments and oppo research, the media pounced. Ed broke it down into questions involving Norway, Russia and Ukraine, but we could presumably be talking about any country in the world. Everyone and their brothers leaped on this as an admission of… something, I guess. One analyst on CNN this morning declared it was clear proof that the President was signaling Russia that he was open for business and ready to take any other dirt they might have on Joe Biden or whoever eventually winds up winning the Democratic nomination.
Once the blowback kicked into gear this morning (and there was plenty of it), the President was back on Twitter explaining how the media had missed what he was saying.
I meet and talk to “foreign governments” every day. I just met with the Queen of England (U.K.), the Prince of Wales, the P.M. of the United Kingdom, the P.M. of Ireland, the President of France and the President of Poland. We talked about “Everything!” Should I immediately….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 13, 2019
….call the FBI about these calls and meetings? How ridiculous! I would never be trusted again. With that being said, my full answer is rarely played by the Fake News Media. They purposely leave out the part that matters.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 13, 2019
When Senator @MarkWarnerVA spoke at length, and in great detail, about extremely negative information on me, with a talented entertainer purporting to be a Russian Operative, did he immediately call the FBI? NO, in fact he didn’t even tell the Senate Intelligence Committee of….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 13, 2019
….which he is a member. When @RepAdamSchiff took calls from another person, also very successfully purporting to be a Russian Operative, did he call the FBI, or even think to call the FBI? NO! The fact is that the phony Witch Hunt is a giant scam where Democrats,…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 13, 2019
….and other really bad people, SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN! They even had an “insurance policy” just in case Crooked Hillary Clinton and the Democrats lost their race for the Presidency! This is the biggest & worst political scandal in the history of the United States of America. Sad!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 13, 2019
Before getting to the substance of his response, allow me to toss out my own hot take here. I’d be willing to bet this was intentional and Trump is just trolling the media and the Democrats again. Ed described the President’s original answer to the question as, “a remarkably tone-deaf argument, especially after the last two-plus years.” On the surface, it certainly seems that way. So that leaves us with two possibilities. Either you have to believe that Donald Trump is so dim-witted that he would forget all of the screaming that’s gone on for two years and blithely say that he’d accept interference from a foreign government, or he’s doing something else.
What’s the other possibility? That Donald Trump is only in his comfort zone when he has the press and the Democrats up in arms and screaming about something. He goads them and prods them constantly. The question Stephanopoulos asked was so crazy as to be insulting and I’m guessing that he nearly wet himself when he got the President to answer in the affirmative. He knew he’d hit a jackpot that would consume the news cycle for at least the next day. (And he obviously did.) Given all of that, I wouldn’t be in the least surprised if President Trump heard the question and made a “shoot from the hip” decision to toss Stephanopoulos a bomb and let him run with it. He thrives when his opponents are in a state of chaos and that’s precisely where things stand now.
As to the President’s tweets, his answers aren’t entirely off base, though they don’t really address the original question. Obviously, Monarchs, Prime Ministers and Presidents of other nations would have many subjects to discuss with the American President, but it’s unlikely they’d be handing over dossiers of dirt on Democratic candidates. Even if one of them made a joke in private about Joe Biden acting creepy or something, the President still wouldn’t run to the FBI or anyone else with that.
But what if another agent of a foreign government strolled up with some actual oppo research? We don’t know the response to that one because the President isn’t saying. But I’d be willing to wager that he’s flipping through the cable news channels today and watching Nancy Pelosi and the commentariat set their hair on fire. And I’m guessing he’s probably smiling. Whether or not this is good political strategy won’t be known until next November.
Hillary generated the Steele dossier, which was foreign oppo research.
He’s right. Any campaign that gets offered dirt will probably pick it up. And investigate it first.
But the Dems manufactured the dirt, washed it through foreign sources, and then claimed to be picking it up.
That’s an entirely different thing.
I would say that any president should be obligated to listen to what “dirt” a foreign leader has on an opponent, or anyone. What if it is truly something that the US needs to know about - like someone operating a pay-to-play gig as Secretary of State. Isn’t it the duty of the leader to listen to them and determine if investigation is warranted?
The Lib’s chain....YANK, YANK.
When I heard President Trump’s comment I thought it was a very bad move. Now to listen to the Opposition’s response, I believe Jim Acosta who said, “He is crazy like a fox!”
Stay tuned...
Stephanopoulos wants any opposition research on democrats to be turned over to the FBI...so that democrats can be made aware of it and the perpretators “dealt with.”
They want it to be UNLAWFUL to defeat a democrat!
Well, Hillary took oppo research from foreign agents and nothing happened to her, so obviously it is legal. What’s good for the old fat drunken goose is good for the gander.
“Mr. War Room” Stephy pinned Romney with a question about female contraception that lead to the entire “war on women” thing.
Now he is trying the same schlock with this question. He is trying to set it up so that ANY and EVERY criticism of the democrat candidate can be labeled as Collusion. In other words, it is illegal to campaign as a Republican cause Russia.
Correct! Clinton actually PAID a foreign national to create dirt on her political opponent. This was done deliberately and with malice aforethought.
To simplify your point, the dems actually did Collude with foreign countries, like RUSSIA, to generate damaging propaganda to affect a national Presidential Election. Then they led a bogus investigation to accuse Trump of doing what they did.
Yeah, true... no doubt...
Haven’t the Ukranian’s admitted that they were trying to help her?
Not exactly the most Conservative outlet out there.... https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
I heard a clip of that ABC interview. When Stephanopolis asked the “what-if” question; would he listen or turn the informant over to the FBI, the President said, ”both.” Then he elaborated on the point that he would listen to the information.
Most would be giddy to get some juicy on any number of people, particularly opponents.
There is a difference between a foreign government or agency coming to you with info, and you going to a foreign government or agency and arranging a setup meeting that would then lead to an FBI, CIA spy operation against the opposition party.
There is a difference between a foreign government or agency coming to you with info, and you going to a foreign government or agency and arranging a setup meeting that would then lead to an FBI, CIA spy operation against the opposition party.
I would ask steffie: “If you were given dirt on DJT by the Canadians, would you use it?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
