Idiot with money.
A dangerous combo.................
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Red Badger
My sister used to work in private banking.
According to her the average person walking around
out there with a 1%er bank account is a complete
raving loon.
2 posted on
06/07/2019 8:16:01 AM PDT by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
To: Red Badger
New target in addition to banning guns, soda pop, cigarettes, sugar.......... Just think of he used his money for good.......😯
3 posted on
06/07/2019 8:18:18 AM PDT by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Red Badger
Meanwhile, China builds a new coal plant every three days.
Will Bloomturd buy out the ChiComs, too?
To: Red Badger
I would quit building huge windmill farms, What an eyesore they are.
5 posted on
06/07/2019 8:18:30 AM PDT by
the_daug
To: Red Badger
“build on leadership and climate progress already underway.”
Totalitarian double speak.
7 posted on
06/07/2019 8:19:44 AM PDT by
Track9
(I mess up the bell curve.)
To: Red Badger
To: Red Badger
Even magic mushrooms wouldn’t cause this level of delusion. WTF?
10 posted on
06/07/2019 8:20:39 AM PDT by
gathersnomoss
(Welcome to North Mexico, Gringo's it...)
To: Red Badger
When bloomingidiotberg starts using ONLY solar and wind power for ALL of his energy needs, transportation included, we can talk.
12 posted on
06/07/2019 8:21:28 AM PDT by
ealgeone
To: Red Badger
Bloomberg is probably THE single most destructive man in America. I hope he dies soon.
15 posted on
06/07/2019 8:27:10 AM PDT by
FLT-bird
To: Red Badger
All electric aircraft running on wind and solar power. Give me a break.
Since nuclear is a no-no (bad word, bad connotations) and liquified natural gas pumps only a third less CO2 than gasoline, what is left?
Is there some technology that the Greenies know about that has escaped our attention?
And dont forget - The U.S. contributes just 15% of the CO2 pumped into the atmosphere. Do we plan to go to war to convince the other 85% to go along with AOCs vision?
19 posted on
06/07/2019 8:31:23 AM PDT by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you finally endorsed. A)
To: Red Badger
I'd bet everything I own that Doomberg,like me,has visited China recently. As a result we both know that wherever you go in China the air is just about unbreathable thanks to coal power plants and factories.Statistics show that China is responsible for at least half of the toxic fumes put into the atmosphere today..and that that figure will rise.
And Doomberg also knows that for every coal powered plant that the West shuts down China opens up 20.
To: Red Badger
because saying tough shit to all the american coal workers worked so well for Hillary.
23 posted on
06/07/2019 8:34:11 AM PDT by
Fhios
To: Red Badger
I cant stand this not even a RINO re_PUBIC_an.
25 posted on
06/07/2019 8:35:04 AM PDT by
phs3
(MAGA - Winning a little more every day!!!)
To: Red Badger
North America can claim 350 years of recoverable coal.
What we need is a Manhattan Project to produce clean coal.
28 posted on
06/07/2019 8:51:07 AM PDT by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
To: Red Badger
31 posted on
06/07/2019 8:56:01 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Can I get a shout out for the person(s) who donated $2,000.00 from France? Thanks so much! Wow!)
To: Red Badger
Hey, Bloomberg, come on down to WV, and give that speech to the miners... I DARE YOU!
Coward.
To: Red Badger
I wonder what size diesel generators Bloomberg has at his many estates.
33 posted on
06/07/2019 8:56:37 AM PDT by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
To: Red Badger
To: Red Badger
Bloomberg said the $500 million program, Beyond Carbon, will put the United States on track toward a 100 percent clean energy economy by working with advocates to "build on leadership and climate progress already underway."We wonder if Bloomberg knows how far an investment of $500 million would go toward improving the technology of coal combustion to provide clean emissions from the burning of coal?
The idea of getting rid of a natural resource by not using it, is plain stupid, is it not?
Spending $500 million on the basis of a false premise does not seem to be very smart.
Investing in clean energy is not wrong if directed in an intelligent, common sense manner.
35 posted on
06/07/2019 8:58:57 AM PDT by
olezip
To: Red Badger
$500 Large....of whose money? Surely not his own. I was born at night; but it wasn’t LAST night. Another grifter.
39 posted on
06/07/2019 9:02:31 AM PDT by
Tucker39
("It ishttps://y impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson