Good. A sane judge who follows the law.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Innovative
refreshing they already had the opportunity to override and failed7
2 posted on
06/03/2019 3:38:09 PM PDT by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: Innovative
NICE a judge with some common sense!
I remember a bunch of conservatives saying that a judge would strike Trump down on this after the government was reopened, and the wall wouldn’t get built.
To: Innovative
A judge who doesnt want to stand between congress and the President?
Who is this mythical creature?
5 posted on
06/03/2019 3:40:14 PM PDT by
dp0622
(The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
To: Innovative
They will shop around and try to find other judges.
6 posted on
06/03/2019 3:40:36 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: Innovative
Appointed in 2017. Must be a Trump pick.
7 posted on
06/03/2019 3:45:58 PM PDT by
be-baw
To: Innovative
Trump judge..
not that it matters, he is following the rule of law. Something sadly unheard of these days.
8 posted on
06/03/2019 3:48:27 PM PDT by
cableguymn
(We need a redneck in the white house....)
To: Innovative
Correct decision. This is a political squabble not a constitutional question.
10 posted on
06/03/2019 3:48:58 PM PDT by
hinckley buzzard
(Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
To: Innovative
12 posted on
06/03/2019 3:55:22 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Innovative
Is this Sane Judge in DC or the state Washington?
14 posted on
06/03/2019 4:06:15 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
( Frau Mueller? "What do the Clintons, Obama and their Spygate CIA/FBI/DOJ thugs have on you???????")
To: Innovative
Judicial confirmations matter:
“Appointed by Donald Trump”
17 posted on
06/03/2019 4:12:49 PM PDT by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: Innovative
24 posted on
06/03/2019 4:26:11 PM PDT by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
To: Innovative
“appropriated accounts to construct his wall”
Sorry, it’s MY wall!!!
25 posted on
06/03/2019 4:26:55 PM PDT by
TrumpisRight
(It is --> President Trump <--)
To: Innovative
Winning...thank you judge...
29 posted on
06/03/2019 4:48:43 PM PDT by
ConservaTeen
(WFLA's Jack Harris: Brooklyn is missing their village idiot. Right you are, Jack.)
To: Innovative
To: Innovative
Oh, man, the Left will not tolerate this kind of craziness coming from a judge!!
I would have given my Manolo Blahniks to see their faces when the hero judge told them to GTHOOH, you morons.
To: Innovative
The House lacks STANDING!
34 posted on
06/03/2019 5:34:50 PM PDT by
Crucial
To: Innovative
To: Innovative
I bought my first 1964 dodge dart from his grandfather, Willie for $200.
37 posted on
06/03/2019 6:38:04 PM PDT by
kvanbrunt2
(spooks won on day 76)
To: Innovative
this is a mistake. We should not recognize judicial rulings in a national emergency situations. I have said that when the decision goes the other way and i say it again when it goes our way.
The congress is the check and balance in emergency declarations and the ED Act gives no role to the judiciary.
You cannot give 200 or so judges the power to stop the response to an emergency.
it is dangerous and rife for abuse of power by a non-elected official.
43 posted on
06/03/2019 7:53:07 PM PDT by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
