Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN's Acosta says 'neutrality for sake of neutrality' doesn't work in Trump era
The Hill ^ | 05/28/19 | Zack Budryk

Posted on 05/28/2019 6:14:25 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: yesthatjallen

21 posted on 05/28/2019 6:57:13 PM PDT by dead (Our next president is going to be sooooo boring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Some wealthy conservative should hire private investigators, forensic accountants and find out who is paying these propagandists posing as journalists.
___________________________

From what I’ve read, it is the networks themselves that are being heavily subsidized by uber-wealthy progs, hedge funds, investment banks, etc.(I suppose that is redundant)

It isn’t the individual so-called journos who are purchased. I imagine guaranteed publishing deals are part of their compensation or, perhaps a requirement that the network bosses see to it is included in the subsidy.

All the journos need is that degree from one of accepted, top-tier universities. I’m told that this is also true in literary fiction publication: only authors with an MFA are even considered. This must be to assure that they are indoctrinated and will automatically hit the required tropes. Note that, like MSM journalism, most literary fiction (as opposed to genre fiction) is unreadable. A scan of the reviews on Amazon for traditionally published and lauded works will show a lot of readers simply find this stuff turgid and unreal. That describes most journalism and books by journalists.

I started really waking up in 1996 or so. I can still recall my shock at the discovery of how much demonic influence there is in the world. As time has gone on, I’ve come to understand that _everything_ we have learned, been taught, is written as history is one huge, complicated, purposeful lie. I’d always had a skeptical streak, but it goes far deeper than most people can even grasp. I can’t be the only one who experiences disgust and despair in the face of these realities. It’s overwhelming.

Unraveling this mess may never become complete.


22 posted on 05/28/2019 6:57:39 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

How about fairness for the sake of fairness?


23 posted on 05/28/2019 6:59:10 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The bastard wouldn’t know neutral if it smacked him in the face. His hard pass should be permanently revoked.


24 posted on 05/28/2019 7:03:01 PM PDT by jimfree (My18 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The excuse of petty tyrants for thousands of years.


25 posted on 05/28/2019 7:04:26 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Acosta is playing the Dan Rather Card, be nasty attacking and high profile and do it repeatedly and you the journalist gets to be the news story and eventually will have a spot on one of the LSM channels.

Except that game plan no longer works.

There are too many media outlets and discussions and he just looks stupid, not heroic.


26 posted on 05/28/2019 7:05:30 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

“Neutrality for the sake of neutrality doesn’t really serve us in the age of Trump.”

I have no idea what that means.
_________________________

It means that since all journalism, history and entertainment media is meant to *serve* an overarching agenda-driven narrative and since Trump is hell-bent on exposing this, they can no longer even pretend to neutrality.

The powers-that-be have declared unrelenting war to the death and the gloves and masks are off. Given the choice between keeping up the pretense of objectivity and taking out, not only Trump, but also the entire philosophical basis of traditional, classical liberal, Enlightenment thought, they have chosen to abandon appearances because they rightly discern their very existence and that of the basis of their power is at severe risk.

This is not confined to the USA. It is a global war. The Australian and EU elections of the past two weeks have the elite power mongers reeling. Suddenly, they are having to fight battles on a myriad of fronts. They cannot waste time and energy and have decided to go straight for the throat of all the populist nationalistic leaders and their supporters, everywhere. Appearances be damned.

Acosta’s colleagues and bosses and their shrinking audience of the inculcated understood him perfectly.


27 posted on 05/28/2019 7:16:52 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
More DESPOTISM from the thugocracy on the Fascist Left.


Despotism (Encyclopedia Britannica film, circa 1946)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaWSqboZr1w

“A community is low on a ‘Respect’ scale if common courtesy is withheld from large groups of people on account of their political attitudes.”

“...in a downright despotism opposition is dangerous whether the despotism is official or whether it is unofficial...”

“A community rates low on the ‘Information’ scale when the press, radio, and other channels of communication are controlled by only a few people and when citizens have to accept what they are told.”

“See how a community trains its teachers”
“...these students are being taught to accept uncritically whatever they are told. Questions are not encouraged.”

“And if books and newspapers and the radio [and facebook and youtube and...] are officially controlled the people will read and accept exactly what the few in control want them to. Government censorship is one form of control. The newspaper that breaks the government censorship rule can be suspended. It is also possible for newspapers and other lines of communication to be controlled by private interests...”

Democracy (Encyclopedia Britannica film, circa 1946)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx25aMPvbJo

“The newspapers of a real democracy meet these tests...”

Newspaper checks.
1. Balance of coverage
2. Disclosure of source
3. Competence of staff


28 posted on 05/28/2019 7:55:40 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
The newspapers of a real democracy meet these tests...”

Newspaper checks. 1. Balance of coverage 2. Disclosure of source 3. Competence of staff

Journalism is no longer about presenting objective facts.

It's about creating a 'narrative'.

29 posted on 05/28/2019 8:04:11 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Well said


30 posted on 05/28/2019 8:14:34 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All

This just proves he’s in the wrong profession!


31 posted on 05/28/2019 8:17:37 PM PDT by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

“A community rates low on the ‘Information’ scale when the press, radio, and other channels of communication are controlled by only a few people and when citizens have to accept what they are told.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That’s pretty much where we are.

The Ministry of Propaganda sends out the narrative and it is regurgitated by multiple outlets.

Anyone outside that narrative is attacked and marginalized.


32 posted on 05/28/2019 8:18:40 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Fake “trump quote” this week
forged national guard memos aired on CBS news near the end of an election

Both times the journalists claimed “fake, but accurate!”


33 posted on 05/28/2019 8:47:17 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

34 posted on 05/28/2019 9:08:23 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (It is no more than a dream remembered, a Civilization gone with the wind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I despise Acosta, but I really despise those screeching, screaming females that are no more polite than common heavy Mafia mob members.

No class, no common sense, no respect and no relevance.


35 posted on 05/28/2019 9:38:06 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

“I wonder how fast his book will be in the bargain bin of history.”

They shouldn’t even waste the employee man-hours to set up the bargain bin with that tripe. They should give the distributor a hard pass, forcing him to take it straight to the book recycling plant.


36 posted on 05/28/2019 9:53:26 PM PDT by GOP Congress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
“Neutrality for the sake of neutrality doesn’t really serve us in the age of Trump.”

* * * *

He's playing with words. He means, "Journalist objectivity and fairness doesn't serve us in the Age of Trump".

Accosted is nothing but a partisan player masking as a journalist.

Click pic to see full screen

37 posted on 05/29/2019 12:13:23 AM PDT by poconopundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

That Twitter quote is right on the money!


38 posted on 05/29/2019 12:29:57 AM PDT by poconopundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
“serve us”? How about objectively reporting facts? <<<<<

You beat me to it!......”us”????????
Does this idiot even have a clue of why its “Fake News”?

Follow up question Jim:

Just who the Hell is “US”??????..

If you answered... us Globalists Marxists and never Trumpers it would be the 1st time in your life you reported a “fact” and wed put you up for a Pulitzer!

39 posted on 05/29/2019 3:42:22 AM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Yep!

Journalists admitted long ago they get into journalism for progressive social advocacy. Limbaugh did pieces on this in the mid-90’s; polls at journalism conventions/seminars demonstrated it, and the great majority polled said they’re Democrats.

And we here know that proggies can never, ever, ever be wrong or (Moloch forbid) admit any error. When obviously, unhideably wrong (as when Trump won), they enter cognitive dissonance and become quite unstable. I think this causes much of the left’s looniness — their inability to admit, learn from and grow after their errors.


40 posted on 05/29/2019 6:44:34 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson