Posted on 05/28/2019 12:18:26 PM PDT by onyx
Obama Appointed FISA Court Judge Contreras Who Recused Himself from Gen. Flynn Case Reportedly Involved in Multiple FISA Court Abuses
In December 2017 we reported that the judge overseeing the General Flynn case who accepted the Generals guilty plea, Judge Rudolph Contreras, recused himself from the Flynn case before sentencing:
U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras of DC recuses from fmr Trump national security advisor Michael T. Flynn's criminal case, court says. Emmet G. Sullivan, a 1994 Clinton appointee and fmr Reagan and Bush I judicial appointee, takes over by random draw https://t.co/4PWa0CLIPI pic.twitter.com/XubybAtXIc
Spencer Hsu (@hsu_spencer) December 7, 2017
Judge Contreras was appointed by Barack Obama in 2012 as United States District Judge for the District of Columbia.
Also, Judge Rudolph Contreras was appointed by Obama to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) court in 2016. Every single judge on the FISA Court as of March 2017 was appointed during Obamas Presidency.
John Roberts has been in his role since 2005 and therefore he has appointed all the judges to the FISA court. Judge Roberts is famous for supporting Obamacare in two radical positions, one of which Justice Antonin Scalia, in his withering dissent, refered to as applesauce. Knowing this, it is concerning that Judge Roberts also is responsible for the makeup of the current FISA court.
In December 2018 it was reported that Judge Contreras is also a friend of fired corrupt FBI Agent Peter Strzok. Text messages were uncovered showing Strzoks relationship with the judge. Sara Carter reported on the texts:
In a text message chain from Page to Strzok on July, 25, 2016 she writes, Rudy is on the FISC! Did you know that? Just appointed two months ago. At that point, the pair continues to discuss other issues but comes back to Contrares, I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him. Then later Strzok appears to return to his discussion about Contreras.
The take-down of General Flynn was a Deep State set up. Dirty cop Andrew McCabe and disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok worked in coordination to take out General Flynn. Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok then ambushed General Flynn and interviewed him on January 24th 2017 without his lawyer present.
Strzok and Judge Contreras were buddies!
Former US Attorney Joe diGenova was on the air a week ago and he shared this (starting at 11:45 in the audio below):
Remember Mr. Contreras, the judge who recused himself from the Flynn case after taking the plea? It is now know that he was involved in several other FISA warrants involved in this matter [fraud on the FISA Court].
Judge Contreras has a lot of explaining to do and so does the Chief Justice of the United States as to what hes done to fix the mess that has been created with the FISA Court.
General Flynn was set up. There is much that we still dont know. The exact reason for corrupt Judge Contreras to recuse himself from the Flynn case is still unknown. We dont know why he did it or who asked him to recuse himself.
You can donate to Lieutenant General (Retired) Michael T. Flynns legal defense fund by clicking here.
his everlastint Soul.
Yes, and it's very reassuring to see that not a single person in the mainstream media has even the tiniest interest in getting to the bottom of this.
Just to make it clear, Rudy Contreras, not Guiliani.
Justice roberts, convicted traitor... Hmmm... Has a nice ring to it...
Who would initiate an impeachment of Chief Justice Roberts? Just talking about it might scare the SC Judges and remind them that they are not above the law. Also, it ought to be against the law for anyone in politics to be blackmailed. So if CJ Roberts is caught, he ought to go to jail. Yes I am angry at him!
Other than the Flynn case, what are Contreras’s other FISA court abuses?
Bttt.
5.56mm
We ALL know what it is.
I said all along...the FISA judges are as corrupt as the FBI and Fedgov prosecutors. They are the prosecutorial class, much more dangerous than mere elites.
According to wiki at least, fisa court appeals are heard by the ussc.
This perhaps puts garland nomination and hold in a new light imho...
Remember this is DC, the District of Corruption.
Who is the spouse of Judge Contreras and where does that individual work?
These are fair questions to ask given the pillow-talkers and big name players.
What i never see discussed is the FISA court system. That is what needs to be litigated. Not this corrupt judge or that corrupt official. This calls into question the whole rotten thing. As if we didn’t know this would happen. But hey. I love to pretend just like the next guy. Besides that i want a pony.
Now would be a very good time for any provable roberts dirt to come out imho... iow before any fisa appeals are heard... otherwise the results might be (ahem) unintended...
...
Chief Justice John Roberts has been in his role since 2005 and therefore he has appointed all the judges to the FISA court.
I'm starting to get the impression Gateway Pundit (and a bunch of other websites) are just auto-generated from transcripts of Sara Carter and Joe diGenova.
Word travels slowly to the Pundits, apparently
Judge Contreras has a lot of explaining to do and so does the Chief Justice of the United States as to what hes done to fix the mess that has been created with the FISA Court.Or what roll he's been playing in the mess/fraud.
Let's not forget his open anti-Trump comment for judges not being partisan. The Chief Justice is apparently the only American that believes that...Or he's lying through his teeth.
Trust no one. If anyone who is elected or appointed to public office is later found to be abusing their office and betraying the American people, they should be sent prison for at least 10 years - for the lightest offense. For major offenses it should be life in prison without parole.
“They were kept from posting this info to the Main FR Forum because of a few whiners who didnt envision change.”
I don’t believe that.
Does the fact that Justice Roberts is a stooge for Obama and that Ruth Bader Ginsberg still hasn’t retired have any significance?
The FISA court corruption was widely reported. I’m not sure what you are rambling on about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.