Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Methodist Women Claim Pro-Life Laws an “Attack on Women’s Reproductive Health”
The Institute on Religion & Democracy ^ | 23 May A.D. 2019 | Katy Vanderkwaak

Posted on 05/24/2019 5:21:55 PM PDT by lightman

Recently, the United Methodist Women (UMW), the official organization for women within the United Methodist Church (UMC), published a statement in response to anti-abortion measures signed into law in Alabama and other states. The May 17 article title states that United Methodist Women are “[decrying] the attack on women’s reproductive health.” This is a bold statement because while the UMW was once a large organization that spoke for women in the church, a dramatic decline in numbers means that they cannot speak for the majority of women within the UMC anymore.

The UMW was once one of the largest women’s organizations and wielded significant influence within the UMC. IRD has tracked the group’s rapid decline and revealed how its progressive agenda has “needlessly alienated so many of the women of the church.”

According to the report on gender in the UMC in 2017, there were just under 4 million U.S. women in the UMC. According to previous IRD articles on the UMW, the organization now has fewer than 800,000 members, which is only a fraction of what they once were and is an even smaller fraction of the total number of women in the UMC.

Not only are the UMW’s declining numbers a problem for their statement against the abortion laws, but they also selectively cherry-pick specific phrases from the United Methodist Book of Discipline that show only one side to the issue. Language in the Discipline shows a nuanced position on abortion and does state that abortion can be prayerfully considered in very specific circumstances, but the position that is mostly emphasized is pro-life. The church declares that it wants to decrease abortions and save the life of the unborn child. “Our belief in the sanctity of unborn human life makes us reluctant to approve abortion. But we are equally bound to respect the sacredness of the life and well-being of the mother and the unborn child” (Book of Discipline, 161).

The UMC General Conference has increasingly made decisions in a pro-life direction. In 2016, the church dropped its endorsement for Roe v Wade and disaffiliated with the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC), major steps towards affirming a stance critical of abortion-on-demand. The UMC also writes that “We cannot affirm abortion as an acceptable means of birth control, and we unconditionally reject it as a means of gender selection or eugenics.” These actions from General Conference written in the Book of Discipline cannot be ignored, as the General Conference (uniquely among denominational bodies) can speak for the entire denomination.

Although the UMW statement claims that their beliefs are in line with the UMC, they only cite short sections from the Book of Discipline that align with their argument against state-level anti-abortion measures that have been passed into law. Their selective quotes do not encompass the true tone of what the UMC General Conference expresses. The Book of Discipline also states, “We mourn and are committed to promoting the diminishment of high abortion rates. The Church shall encourage ministries to reduce unintended pregnancies such as comprehensive, age-appropriate sexuality education, advocacy in regard to contraception, and support of initiatives that enhance the quality of life for all women and girls around the globe.” This desire to see a decrease in abortions and support women who are struggling with pregnancy or parenthood is strongly emphasized in the UMC.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; crazywomen; prolife; rcoar; umc; unitedmethodist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2019 5:21:55 PM PDT by lightman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lightman

Not a Christian among them.


2 posted on 05/24/2019 5:22:51 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

In standing up for the murder-by-abortion of children of the womb these women portray themselves as Satan’s sluts.


3 posted on 05/24/2019 5:23:44 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Someone please, please explain to me how Pro Life-Beliefs and Laws impact and cause havoc with women’s reproductive health, I just must know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


4 posted on 05/24/2019 5:24:24 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

How is killing a baby in the womb good for reproductive health?
Got some medical studies to back that up?


5 posted on 05/24/2019 5:25:15 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Much lezziness, I sense.


6 posted on 05/24/2019 5:26:01 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Well, if being pregnant impacts their health, wouldn’t it be better if they kept their legs together and not have sex.


7 posted on 05/24/2019 5:26:33 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Untied Satanist Wymmyn.


8 posted on 05/24/2019 5:29:51 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

And folks who ask me if I go to church wonder when I say NO!


9 posted on 05/24/2019 5:30:13 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Sisters of Moloch


10 posted on 05/24/2019 5:32:05 PM PDT by Polyxene (Out of the depths I have cried to Thee, O Lord; Lord, hear my voice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Reproduction by definition does not include killing your child.


11 posted on 05/24/2019 5:32:54 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Nor a NEARLY good looking woman..


12 posted on 05/24/2019 5:35:33 PM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman

If women want to prevent themselves from getting pregnant I got a simple solution for them..KEEP YOUR LEGS CLOSED..see, solved the problem


13 posted on 05/24/2019 5:39:32 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

“Nor a NEARLY good looking woman..”

Yep better looking mutts are put down every day by the animal shelters.
WOOF!


14 posted on 05/24/2019 5:40:30 PM PDT by oldvirginian ( Buckle up kids, rough road ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

“Hold a nickel between your knees”


15 posted on 05/24/2019 5:41:23 PM PDT by lightman (Byzantine Troparia: The "praise choruses" of antiquity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian

ROFL!

Good God what an ugly bunch!!!

How can it be that not ONE is relatively attractive?

I have 78 year old Italian aunt who’s better looking!


16 posted on 05/24/2019 5:45:07 PM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Only evil people would have such a perverted view.


17 posted on 05/24/2019 5:48:48 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

You know if they are actually concerned about a woman’s reproductive health, one would think they would be unhappy with the physical risk and damage to a woman’s reproductive organs that comes from an abortion.

They would have you think that an abortion is no different than having your tooth filled. Oh that ain’t true.


18 posted on 05/24/2019 5:51:24 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10
I am more Christian than these people.

(and I'm Jewish!)

19 posted on 05/24/2019 5:53:36 PM PDT by KC_Lion (If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman
I'm having trouble finding even one in that group who would be likely ever to *need* an abortion.

/cats>

20 posted on 05/24/2019 5:55:43 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson