Posted on 05/19/2019 1:36:08 PM PDT by Ennis85
Only if they are pro-life.
The baby is 50/50....Decisions should be 50/50 also.
They want to discriminate by sex?
Perhaps many would be for abortion so as to get out of paying child support, if they thought that far ahead. In my opinion, it is a very rare man that would be pro-life if the experience were real & not merely a question. If you have no say, you have no guilt for the murder.
Democrats believe America would be a better place if more women held high positions in government. So why aren’t Democrats applauding Donald Trump for appointing more women judges to our courts?
Yeah but only when it was the men who decided Roe vs Wade...
“...get out of paying child support...”
Of course self interest would drive men to say abortion is A-okay. That is why Hedonistic men like Hugh Hefner championed abortion. It takes higher ethics to oppose abortion. Tim Tebow is pro-life because Tim Tebow considers morals and God and right and wrong. Things that are very foreign to Gloria Steinem, Hillary Clinton, and Rachel Maddow.
The pro-life movement was largely led by women since Roe vs. Wade with leaders like Nellie Gray and Phyllis Schlafly.
DALLAS, TXLocal man Eric Spolar attempted to voice his opinion on abortion to a coworker Thursday. Unfortunately, he was informed that since he is a man, he does not get to have an opinion on killing babies.
So, Spolar came up with a brilliant solution...
Heh heh, love the Babylon Bee, better than The Onion.
“Rare men” and “rare women” are both needed, who will rather marry (as applicable) rather than further a mistake.
What does gender have to do with the morality of killing pre-natal babies?
“Most of the US state laws banning or severely restricting access to abortions have been voted on by male politicians. Should men have the right to rule on an issue that impacts women so intimately?”
If women are taking taxpayer money to have abortions, then yes, whoever the politicians are have a decision. Can’t have it both ways.
How about an appointed guardian to speak for the unborn child?
Morbid, yet oddly satisfying.
Yes
If you don’t believe in slavery, don’t own one.
Notice how when they get (or manufacture) enough votes to hold a majority in Congress or a state house its a mandate (easy there, Ebola, it’s a political term) for their policies, but if Republicans are the majority, there’s suddenly all these extra steps, like checking between the legs, before they get to pass laws?
Both genders can be victims of abortion.
Which of the many of genders are allowed to have an opinion on which of the many topics again? One needs spreadsheets just to keep up with the BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.