Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Did Attorney General William Barr deceive Congress?
Fox News ^ | May 9, 2019 | Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Posted on 05/09/2019 12:02:34 PM PDT by yoe

(William Barr, the attorney general of the United States), now faces a likely contempt citation for failing to comply with a congressional subpoena and for misleading Congress. This is about the (Mueller investigation of Russian interference) in the 2016 presidential election. Isn't the investigation now complete? How did the attorney general's veracity become an issue and thereby extend the life of the investigation?

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911truther; andrewnapolitano; attorneygeneral; genderdysphoria; homosexualagenda; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; smearmachine; williambarr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: ETL
😂 Priceless!!
21 posted on 05/09/2019 12:16:29 PM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Nap is a little homosexual deceiving everyone that he isn’t.


22 posted on 05/09/2019 12:16:57 PM PDT by CodeToad ( Hating on Trump is hating on me and Americans!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_daug

Judge is a lawyer who couldn’t make it.——AND becomes a parasite for life more than likely if gets an ‘appointed position’....


23 posted on 05/09/2019 12:17:41 PM PDT by litehaus (A memory toooo long.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee
God, when will FNC get rid of the judge, Cavuto, Shep and Wallace. Hate these guys more than I do the idiots over on CNBC.

Aree totally. Wallace is a hard core communists Democrat. The judge is just a flake.

24 posted on 05/09/2019 12:17:55 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yoe

It’s been 24 years since he was an actual judge, but he still gets to call himself that.


25 posted on 05/09/2019 12:18:15 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Trump: "America will never be a socialist country!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Did he come out of the closet? Or was he outed. I wasn’t aware that he was a homosexual.


26 posted on 05/09/2019 12:18:27 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yoe

“When Barr was testifying before a House subcommittee about his budgetary requests for the Department of Justice in the next fiscal year, he was asked by a member of the subcommittee if he knew anything about any criticisms by members of Mueller’s team about his four-page summary of Mueller’s conclusions. He replied, “No, I don’t.””

That is a lie, “judge”.

Barr was only asked whether some members of Mueller’s team took issue with the accuracy of his summary — not whether Mueller wanted to see more context in Barr’s initial letter.

“I spoke to Bob Mueller, not members of his team,” Barr explained. “And I did not know what was being referred to, and Mueller had never told me that the expression of the findings was inaccurate.”


27 posted on 05/09/2019 12:18:39 PM PDT by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Nappie has become a Political Hack.

Nothing to see here.

Fake News.


28 posted on 05/09/2019 12:18:40 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23
The RATs have NOTHING and they know the “hammer is coming”. They’re grasping at straws. Anything to deflect what’s fixing to happen to em.

And what if that hammer never comes? If history is any indication of the future, it's more likely no one will ever be held accountable. Look at Nixon, he was framed in a very similar way to Trump. The beltway hated him and they were able to effect his removal. Once he was gone, everything was dropped and DC did not even break stride. Trump is not going down the way Nixon did, to date. But the dems, msm and the gopE will not take no for an answer. At every failure, they respond by escalating their attack. I don't think Trump is going to surrender, so where does the continual escalation end?
29 posted on 05/09/2019 12:20:36 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Trump stands alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Wait a minute. Wasn’t the reason Barr was held in contempt for the reason he failed to turner over the un-redacted Mueller report? If so, wouldn’t that be against Federal law and shouldn’t little Eddie Munster know that?


30 posted on 05/09/2019 12:23:21 PM PDT by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I am sick of this ex traffic ticket city judge. He is a jerk. When he appears— we disappear to other channels. He has lost all credibility. He just comes our to piss off conservatives. I have emailed two sponsors and I will never watch him again.


31 posted on 05/09/2019 12:23:54 PM PDT by bingoplayer (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: yoe

Napolitano clearly has an axe to grind. The MSM and the public were demanding to know what Muelller had written in his Report well before it could be properly redacted and released.

Barr gave them what they wanted. Did he capture the evil intent of the Mueller Team desperate but failed attempt to discover President Trump crimes? I guess he didn’t. Too bad for the Dems. But it isn’t criminal. Barr wasn’t after “tone”, he was after facts.


33 posted on 05/09/2019 12:29:24 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Hey ‘Judge’ did Shep tell you to say that ?


34 posted on 05/09/2019 12:30:00 PM PDT by WashingtonFire (The charisma of Reagan + the vision of Jefferson + the patriotism of Washington = Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Barr has stated more than once that his four page report was not a summary, was never meant to be a summary, knowing that the full Mueller report would soon be available.

Barr said it was meant to deliver Mueller’s bottom line.

“It is clear that Barr’s four-page letter... was a foolish attempt to sanitize the Mueller report. It was misleading, disingenuous and deceptive.”

Okay, old judge old boy, you have had time to go over the report, so give us chapter and verse wherein that sanitizing occurred.


35 posted on 05/09/2019 12:32:28 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ETL

I call him the Lunch Lady. He has a permanent hair net.


36 posted on 05/09/2019 12:35:49 PM PDT by Atticus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant
Check out his Wikipedia entry. It refers to a "close friend" who passed away a few years ago.

He hasn't come out of the closet, but apparently his sexual orientation is one of the worst-kept secrets in the TV business.

37 posted on 05/09/2019 12:39:23 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

According to Napalitano Barr “was asked by a member of the subcommittee if he knew anything about any criticisms by members of Mueller’s team about his four-page summary of Mueller’s conclusions. He replied, “No, I don’t.””
Actually what Barr was asked by Charlie Crist was as follows -
“Reports have emerged recently … that members of the special counsel’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the report’s findings. Do you know what they’re referencing with that?”
Barr’s response was “No, I don’t. I think, I think, I suspect that they probably wanted, you know, more put out. “
The question asked about Barr’s knowledge of the “team”’s “frustration” with the summary not “adequately or accurately” portraying the report’s findings. But Barr believes his summary, while “limited”, did accurately portray the report’s findings. So when asked what these unnamed, second-hand comments were “referencing”, Barr said he didn’t “know”, and said what he suspected. If someone says they are frustrated because I am late for an appointment, but in fact I am on time for the appointment, I would say I don’t “know” what is making them frustrated, because their frustration has no basis in fact - even though they they have stated exactly what they are frustrated by in their imaginary world.
Napalitano says the question was whether Barr knew “anything” about the criticism of the 4 page report. In fact the question was whether he knew what caused the “team members” to to feel the report was not “accurate”. The report was accurate, so Judge Napalitano is a liar, just like Mazie Hirono, Pelosi, Nadler, and their ilk.


38 posted on 05/09/2019 12:43:08 PM PDT by brookwood (Obama said you could keep your plan - now says higher taxes will improve the weather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I absolutely hate listening to this guy, whether it’s on TV or Radio.

Do you notice you never see him on Lou Dobbs, Laura or Tucker. Not sure if Hannity has him on either.

This guy is a jerk, first class idiot.

I’m smarter than he is.

I’m not sure when it happened but within about the first year of Trump’s presidency, he turned on Trump.

100% taking the opposite line.

This article is a joke.

I turn him off whenever he comes on.

He offers no insight, no concrete thought.

It’s all speculation, and in fact, if you were to take the time and look at his articles, they’re almost all wrong...

I mean dead wrong.

Time to give this guy, Like George Will, the boot.

Throw in Juan, Sheep, Cavuto too...


39 posted on 05/09/2019 12:44:30 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Man, this clown is pathetic. Just because he wasn’t considered for SCOTUS, he cries like a little girl and this is how he “gets” Trump..


40 posted on 05/09/2019 12:44:48 PM PDT by max americana (Fired libtards at our company for the past 12 yrs at every election. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson