Posted on 05/09/2019 12:02:34 PM PDT by yoe
(William Barr, the attorney general of the United States), now faces a likely contempt citation for failing to comply with a congressional subpoena and for misleading Congress. This is about the (Mueller investigation of Russian interference) in the 2016 presidential election. Isn't the investigation now complete? How did the attorney general's veracity become an issue and thereby extend the life of the investigation?
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Nap is a little homosexual deceiving everyone that he isn’t.
Judge is a lawyer who couldnt make it.——AND becomes a parasite for life more than likely if gets an ‘appointed position’....
Aree totally. Wallace is a hard core communists Democrat. The judge is just a flake.
It’s been 24 years since he was an actual judge, but he still gets to call himself that.
Did he come out of the closet? Or was he outed. I wasn’t aware that he was a homosexual.
“When Barr was testifying before a House subcommittee about his budgetary requests for the Department of Justice in the next fiscal year, he was asked by a member of the subcommittee if he knew anything about any criticisms by members of Mueller’s team about his four-page summary of Mueller’s conclusions. He replied, “No, I don’t.””
That is a lie, “judge”.
Barr was only asked whether some members of Muellers team took issue with the accuracy of his summary not whether Mueller wanted to see more context in Barrs initial letter.
I spoke to Bob Mueller, not members of his team, Barr explained. And I did not know what was being referred to, and Mueller had never told me that the expression of the findings was inaccurate.
Nappie has become a Political Hack.
Nothing to see here.
Fake News.
Wait a minute. Wasn’t the reason Barr was held in contempt for the reason he failed to turner over the un-redacted Mueller report? If so, wouldn’t that be against Federal law and shouldn’t little Eddie Munster know that?
I am sick of this ex traffic ticket city judge. He is a jerk. When he appears— we disappear to other channels. He has lost all credibility. He just comes our to piss off conservatives. I have emailed two sponsors and I will never watch him again.
Napolitano clearly has an axe to grind. The MSM and the public were demanding to know what Muelller had written in his Report well before it could be properly redacted and released.
Barr gave them what they wanted. Did he capture the evil intent of the Mueller Team desperate but failed attempt to discover President Trump crimes? I guess he didnt. Too bad for the Dems. But it isnt criminal. Barr wasnt after tone, he was after facts.
Hey Judge did Shep tell you to say that ?
Barr has stated more than once that his four page report was not a summary, was never meant to be a summary, knowing that the full Mueller report would soon be available.
Barr said it was meant to deliver Mueller’s bottom line.
“It is clear that Barr’s four-page letter... was a foolish attempt to sanitize the Mueller report. It was misleading, disingenuous and deceptive.”
Okay, old judge old boy, you have had time to go over the report, so give us chapter and verse wherein that sanitizing occurred.
I call him the Lunch Lady. He has a permanent hair net.
He hasn't come out of the closet, but apparently his sexual orientation is one of the worst-kept secrets in the TV business.
According to Napalitano Barr “was asked by a member of the subcommittee if he knew anything about any criticisms by members of Mueller’s team about his four-page summary of Mueller’s conclusions. He replied, “No, I don’t.””
Actually what Barr was asked by Charlie Crist was as follows -
“Reports have emerged recently
that members of the special counsels team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the reports findings. Do you know what theyre referencing with that?”
Barr’s response was “No, I dont. I think, I think, I suspect that they probably wanted, you know, more put out. “
The question asked about Barr’s knowledge of the “team”’s “frustration” with the summary not “adequately or accurately” portraying the report’s findings. But Barr believes his summary, while “limited”, did accurately portray the report’s findings. So when asked what these unnamed, second-hand comments were “referencing”, Barr said he didn’t “know”, and said what he suspected. If someone says they are frustrated because I am late for an appointment, but in fact I am on time for the appointment, I would say I don’t “know” what is making them frustrated, because their frustration has no basis in fact - even though they they have stated exactly what they are frustrated by in their imaginary world.
Napalitano says the question was whether Barr knew “anything” about the criticism of the 4 page report. In fact the question was whether he knew what caused the “team members” to to feel the report was not “accurate”. The report was accurate, so Judge Napalitano is a liar, just like Mazie Hirono, Pelosi, Nadler, and their ilk.
I absolutely hate listening to this guy, whether it’s on TV or Radio.
Do you notice you never see him on Lou Dobbs, Laura or Tucker. Not sure if Hannity has him on either.
This guy is a jerk, first class idiot.
I’m smarter than he is.
I’m not sure when it happened but within about the first year of Trump’s presidency, he turned on Trump.
100% taking the opposite line.
This article is a joke.
I turn him off whenever he comes on.
He offers no insight, no concrete thought.
It’s all speculation, and in fact, if you were to take the time and look at his articles, they’re almost all wrong...
I mean dead wrong.
Time to give this guy, Like George Will, the boot.
Throw in Juan, Sheep, Cavuto too...
Man, this clown is pathetic. Just because he wasn’t considered for SCOTUS, he cries like a little girl and this is how he “gets” Trump..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.