Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump invokes ‘privilege’ over the full Mueller report
Associated Press ^ | May 8, 2019 | Mary Clare Jalonick and Lisa Mascaro

Posted on 05/08/2019 9:16:19 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The White House invoked executive privilege Wednesday, claiming the right to block lawmakers from the full report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Trump-Russia probe and escalating the battle between President Donald Trump and Congress.

The administration’s decision was announced just as the House Judiciary Committee was gaveling in to consider holding Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress over failure to release the full report.

Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler of New York declared the action by Trump’s Justice Department was a clear new sign of the president’s “blanket defiance” of Congress’ constitutional rights. “Every day we learn of new efforts by this administration to stonewall Congress,” Nadler said. “This is unprecedented.”

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said the action was rather a response to the “blatant abuse of power” by Democratic Rep. Nadler.

“Neither the White House nor Attorney General Barr will comply with Chairman Nadler’s unlawful and reckless demands,” she said. …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barr; executiveprivilege; mueller; muellerreport; nadler; sanders; tds; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2019 9:16:19 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This seems unnecessary. Aren’t some of the redactions required by law?


2 posted on 05/08/2019 9:18:27 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Was this necessary given that providing the FULL report is illegal...? Maybe it was.


3 posted on 05/08/2019 9:18:55 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

He didn’t invoke privilege while he was being investigated.


4 posted on 05/08/2019 9:22:00 AM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I am not sure that was a good idea. I suspect the courts will rule against him. But maybe that’s what he wants. Playing the victim works well for Trump. The Dems don’t seem to have figured that out.


5 posted on 05/08/2019 9:22:38 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Will the Dems spin Exec. Privilege as an insidious form of White privilege? Asking for..well, you know.


6 posted on 05/08/2019 9:23:19 AM PDT by Impala64ssa (Virtue signalling is no virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Law? We don’t need no stinking law. We want to rule forever.


7 posted on 05/08/2019 9:25:42 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Nadler said. “This is unprecedented.”

Hardly.

And I note the headline with privilege in quote. Like it's not a real thing. Like it's something the President just sort of made-up so that he could obstruct justice some more.

8 posted on 05/08/2019 9:26:13 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The only court that can rule against executive privilege is the Supreme court. Good luck.


9 posted on 05/08/2019 9:27:33 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Of course it’s illegal, that’s the whole point.

If Barr refused to comply, he gets charged with Contempt of Congress.

If he did comply, Democrats would have him impeached for illegally releasing Grand Jury info.

Classic trap ... until it gets to the courts


10 posted on 05/08/2019 9:28:18 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

This is brilliant.

They’ve already been given all the rope they need.

Time to set the lines of battle.


11 posted on 05/08/2019 9:29:32 AM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler of New York declared the action by Trump’s Justice Department was a clear new sign of the president’s "blanket defiance" of Congress' constitutional rights.

Congress doesn't have "constitutional rights." It has constitutional authority.

One authority they don't have is the authority to make demands of executive branch officers -- especially a minor officer like Mueller who was never subject to Senate confirmation.

12 posted on 05/08/2019 9:34:25 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Excellent move by Trump. Screw you Democrats.


13 posted on 05/08/2019 9:35:49 AM PDT by hotsteppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle; EagleUSA

IMO invoking executive privilege is a very stupid move in this case. It enables the Dems and their Leftist media accomplices to now further claim a coverup, which too many not paying attention people would find plausable.

It should have just been blasted out that what the House Dems were demanding IS illegal.


14 posted on 05/08/2019 9:37:24 AM PDT by A strike (Import third world become third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
I predict this will never get to the courts.

The last thing the Democrats want is a court proceeding that's actually based on an objective analysis of the law instead of political hysterics.

15 posted on 05/08/2019 9:37:48 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

According to Bongino, there are six (6) lines throughout the 100 page report that are redacted. So tell me....WTF is the problem?


16 posted on 05/08/2019 9:38:57 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (Grace and Dignity Will Win The Day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Nadler forgets about Article 16.


17 posted on 05/08/2019 9:40:10 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A strike
IMO invoking executive privilege is a very stupid move in this case.

The political optics was what prevented Trump from firing Mueller even though he had all the authority he needed to do so.

The President didn't invoke executive privilege here to keep the Democrats from seeing the full report. It was done to prevent Congress from demanding testimony from every member of the executive branch who ever had a conversation with Trump.

18 posted on 05/08/2019 9:40:16 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
Either Bongino is wrong, or he's talking about a different report.

The report is 400+ pages, not 100.

19 posted on 05/08/2019 9:41:08 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

We’ll see what the courts say.


20 posted on 05/08/2019 9:42:25 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson