Sen. Kamala Harris cashes in on Trump's 'nasty' insult

Washington Times ^ | - Friday, May 3, 2019 | S.A. Miller

[conservative98]

Sen. Kamala D. Harris, a Democratic presidential candidate, must be raking in the campaign cash from President Trump calling her “nasty.”

She sent out a second fund-raising email in as many days Friday boasting that Mr. Trump called her “probably very nasty” when questioning Attorney General William P. Barr at a Senate hearing.

“It’s clear President Trump doesn’t like to be held accountable. He saw how Kamala pressed Bill Barr for the truth and knows what’s in store for him if he has to face Kamala on the debate stage in 2020,” said the Harris campaign email to supporters.

The president’s jab at Ms. Harris, California Democrat, echoed his “nasty woman” criticism of Hillary Clinton in 2016 that became a feminist battle cry against Mr. Trump.

Getting insulted or criticized by Mr. Trump has become a badge of honor for the 2020 Democratic hopefuls.

On the stump in Iowa on Wednesday, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden relished Mr. Trump labeling him “Sleepy Joe.”

“I understand the president has been tweeting about me this morning. I wonder why the hell he’s doing that,” Mr. Biden said, suggesting Mr. Trump feared facing him in a 2020 general election matchup.

[Chickensoup]

They remind me of something a co-worker said about my then secretary:

She has been told all her life that she is smart, she believes it, but it isn’t true.

[DoughtyOne]

I hear ya.

There are guys like that too, to be sure.

These people just don’t grasp that they could be wrong.

If they feel entitled, it’s even worse.

[TMN78247]

And you think that the male members of the MORON LEFT are any less childish, hateful, vulgar, MEAN-spirited or worthless than “Miss Trashy” demonstrably is??

Yours, TMN878247

[DoughtyOne]

I explained why I addressed the women.

If you wish to address the men, be my guest.

[Jane Long]

Heels Up Harris.

[TMN78247]

Pardon me for pointing out that the so-called “men” of the MORON LEFT act in the same way as the so-called “feminist left” acts. = Both genders are hateful, vindictive & “play the gender & race cards” equally.

Also the males of the group often seem LESS traditionally “manly” than many of the “feminazis”.

Yours, TMN78247

[Irish Eyes]

Low IQ Joe/the female Obama.

That’ll be the ticket.

That would not surprise me at all.

[DoughtyOne]

You poor thing.

I addressed the women of the Left and this has triggered you.

I have already explained why I addressed the women, and have already encouraged you to cover the men if you like.

I’m not sorry it seems so unfair to you when I address the women of the Left in a derogatory manner.

[TMN78247]

Pardon me for pointing out that I did exactly as you requested & addressed the men of the leftist lunatic fringe & pointed out how inadequate as men/adults, that most of the males of the “loony left” seem to be.

Because you evidently want nobody to talk about anyone but the person(s) that you want to discuss does not mean that everyone else has to agree with your opinions/positions NOR that you have been “placed in charge” of anyone else posting their own opinions/comments on this thread/forum.
(At least to me, you seem awfully “sensitive” & intolerant of other members of the forum, to be a “FReeper”.)

Yours, TMN78247

[DoughtyOne]

Pardon me for pointing out that I did exactly as you requested & addressed the men of the leftist lunatic fringe & pointed out how inadequate as men/adults, that most of the males of the “loony left” seem to be.

It seemed to me that you came back to make some nasty comment about Leftist men, that seemed more to be a dig at men simply because I had addressed a group of women.

It wasn't my request that you come back and make the comments about men to me.  I hadn't made the comments about Leftist women expressly to you.  I don't disagree about the men.  It just wasn't the group I chose to address.

Because you evidently want nobody to talk about anyone but the person(s) that you want to discuss does not mean that everyone else has to agree with your opinions/positions NOR that you have been “placed in charge” of anyone else posting their own opinions/comments on this thread/forum.

I told you I didn't mind you addressing the men, and I encouraged you to do it.  I merely clarified why I chose to address who I did.

You'll have to excuse me for pointing out that I never trashed you for addressing who you wanted to.  I did not try to dictate who you talked about.  I never said or intimated I was placed in charge.

It is however interesting that you did feel compelled to take me to task for addresing only women, and then had to post about men directly to me though.  Aren't you projecting a bit?

(At least to me, you seem awfully “sensitive” & intolerant of other members of the forum, to be a “FReeper”.)

Well, you are free to come to any conclusiong that makes sense to you.

I explained why I only addressed women.  I suggested you were free to address the men if you liked.  Not sure how that's being intollerant.  Weren't you being intollernt of my right to address women if I wanted to?

Yours, TMN78247