Posted on 04/30/2019 8:18:02 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
How do you cover objectively when you lable your subject a denier? Denier = heretic?
Its all very natural.
Back in the 1960s through 1980s, environmentalists focused on actual pollution: foreign substances not naturally found in nature that were released into the environment by people and that were harmful to people, animals and plants.
The only solution was more government control and higher taxes.
Then the Iron Curtain fell and it became undeniably obvious to everyone that the countries with the most government control were toxic cesspools of pollution. In capitalist countries, people own property and want to keep their own property clean. In communist and socialist countries, the government owns most property and the people and government use it as a common dump.
So in the 1990s, environmentalists switched to carbon dioxide, a natural substance that not only is not harmful to life, but is essential to the existence of all life on Earth. Why carbon dioxide? Successful (i.e. capitalist) countries produce more carbon dioxide per person because they produce more of everything per person. Communist and socialist countries produce less of everything including carbon dioxide. By focusing on carbon dioxide instead of actual pollutants, the environmental left can point the finger at capitalism and free markets instead of too much government control.
The only solution is the same, more government control and higher taxes.
I have taken to calling left wing liberals who think that gender is fluid and that there are more than two sexes “Biology Deniers” or “Science Deniers.” It really pisses them off.
Some one should call out Newsweek for minimizing the horror of the Holocaust by using the term “denier”. It remains disgusting to use that word.
you are exactly right... science isn’t done by consensus. there is a specific method they follow. what was it called again? that’s right, the scientific method. no where does it say that a hypothesis becomes a law when 9 out of 10 of your friends agree with you.
LOL! Not this shit again. Consensus, smensenus! That is not scientific in the least. I am so tired of this crap.
I believe the decimal point is off by one place.
By volume, dry air contains 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases. Air also contains a variable amount of water vapor, on average around 1% at sea level, and 0.4% over the entire atmosphere.
Oh, yeah. That’s right. It’s 4/100ths of 1%. Thank you.
To a liberal or to a Conservative? To a conservative 2...only 2...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.