Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate Change Denier Tells Fox & Friends Carbon Dioxide 'Not A Pollution'
Newsweek ^ | April 30, 2019 | By Benjamin Fearnow

Posted on 04/30/2019 8:18:02 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

Beto is a Loser.


21 posted on 04/30/2019 8:39:18 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amihow

To the best of my recollection, plants take in CO2 and produce O2 during photosynthesis, in the daytime. At night, this reverses, so O2 is taken in and CO2 is expelled.

The atmosphere of the entire Earth is their “storage battery” to get them through periods of darkness.

Animals show up later to take advantage of this energy-reserve.


22 posted on 04/30/2019 8:39:41 AM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This is a textbook example of the Left’s strategy of manipulating language to win arguments in advance. We absolutely have to stop letting them do this. There is no such thing as a “Climate Change Denier™”, and there is no “Scientific Consesus™”. In fact the phrase “Scientific Consensus” is absurd - political ideologies have consensuses, not actual scientists. This constantly repeated trope that “97% of scientists agree” has no more validity than the “17 intelligence agencies” that concurred about Russian Collusion.

We should refuse to even discuss terms such as “Climate Denier” and “Scientific Consensus” How about we substitute “Communist Climate Hoaxer” and “Orwellian Scientific Fraud” and start our own arguments?


23 posted on 04/30/2019 8:41:13 AM PDT by Junk Silver ("It's a little hard to herd people onto trains when they're shooting at you." SirLurkedalot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amihow

They do both. When engaged in respiration (no light or low light) they release CO2 like animals. When the sun shines they are doing photosynthesis. This fixes CO2 and releases Oxygen. There is a net advantage to photosynthesis. So they use more CO2 (sequester in wood and cellulose) than they release.


24 posted on 04/30/2019 8:41:53 AM PDT by muskah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: amihow
Do plants exhale CO2?

Plants absorb and produce both oxygen and carbon dioxide. When there is light, the net balance is more oxygen and less carbon dioxide. At night, this is reversed. But the effect is tiny, and air mixed freely.

25 posted on 04/30/2019 8:44:33 AM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

CO2 is not a pollution. It is a natural gas. It is currently blamed for ALL the Earth’s heating, while the Sun is completely overlooked.

Read “The Neglected Sun.”


26 posted on 04/30/2019 8:47:04 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Lying Media: willing and eager allies of the hate-America left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Happer misses the point, warmer is not a function of CO2.

CO2 increases with warming.


27 posted on 04/30/2019 8:49:39 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: central_va; cuban leaf

Human beings and everything we need to sustain life is based on carbon. Let’s eliminate it and see what happens.


28 posted on 04/30/2019 8:53:45 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

“Haven’t we any scientists on our side”

This man does a good job:

https://twitter.com/nikolovscience/status/1123189736552615939?s=21


29 posted on 04/30/2019 8:55:59 AM PDT by Darnright (We live in interesting times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

When it gets cold, plants go fallow, shed their leaves and they decompose, producing nothing but CO2.


30 posted on 04/30/2019 8:56:49 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s true.. it is NOT a pollution...


31 posted on 04/30/2019 9:02:51 AM PDT by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Newsweak denies reality ever day.

Pop quiz, how many sexes are there?


32 posted on 04/30/2019 9:08:19 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The planet is suffering from an Epoch level drought of CO2.


33 posted on 04/30/2019 9:17:03 AM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I wonder how many Climate Change Hoax Deniers are even aware of the fact that plants convert CO2 into oxygen.


34 posted on 04/30/2019 9:18:11 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Did he also point out that CO2 accounts for only 4/10ths of 1% of our atmosphere?


35 posted on 04/30/2019 9:20:25 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

I do too but haven’t we any scientists on our side who can rebut this nonsense?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You mean the ones who are paid off by the big oil companies to lie about it???? /sheldon


36 posted on 04/30/2019 9:22:04 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If you want to see how the Climate Change Hoax affects your pocketbook, look at California. The cheapest gas out here is just a hair under $4 a gallon.


37 posted on 04/30/2019 9:22:43 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What would we get for that $5 trillion?

1. Unreliable power that go out with regularity
2. Very high power prices, probably double, maybe triple today’s prices
3. Tens of millions of dead raptors and bats and possible extinction
4. Billions of dead butterflies and possible extinction
5. America’s spectacular vistas blighted and ruined forever. Wind turbines as far as the eye can see all ove America
6. An area as large as California covered with solar panels blinding airline pilots and cooling the ground underneath. Prime agricultural land gone to waste.
7. Enormous rare earth mines opened all over the earth’s crust on every continent but Antarctica.
8. A gigantic expansion of concrete and steel production and consumption. Huge increase of CO2 from cement calcining.
9. Huge expansion of noise pollution from wind turbines across the U.S. huge increase in annoying flickering shadows from wind turbines. Tens or hundreds of thousands of families forced to leave their long-time and ancestral homes because of deleterious health effects.
10. Gigantic hazardous waste stream from disposal of EV, residential, and utility energy storage batteries.

Compared to today’s world, this is goi g to be a colossal disruption and environmental nightmare. The greenies and politicians are heading us down a disastrous path compared to the highly evolved and optimized conventional power systems we use today.


38 posted on 04/30/2019 9:32:23 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Exactly. CO2 is a coolant, not a heater. And when it’s cold, the oceans absorb it. When it gets warm they release it, helping to cool the planet.

The whole system was designed to be self correcting, and does a fine job.


39 posted on 04/30/2019 9:37:15 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
When a "consensus" (as if one actually exists in this case) is demonstrably wrong it is worth less than a puddle of warm pi$$. Which is just a blunt way to point out the fallacious logic of Appeal to Authority.
40 posted on 04/30/2019 9:42:02 AM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson