Posted on 04/26/2019 7:04:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
On Monday night, Bernie Sanders gave the most Bernielicious answer possible when asked if the Boston Marathon bomber should be allowed to vote from prison. It took him several minutes of disjointed babbling to get to his point that yes, everybody should be able to vote, even somebody who's on death row for planting a bomb right next to an eight-year-old boy.
When Kamala Harris was asked to comment on Bernie's ridiculous answer, she said:
"I agree that the right to vote is one of the very important components of citizenship, and it is something that people should not be stripped of needlessly, which is why I have been long an advocate of making sure that the formerly incarcerated are not denied a right to vote, which is the case in so many states in our country. In some states, permanently deprived of the right to vote. And these are policies that go back to Jim Crow, these are policies that go back to the heart of policies that have been about disenfranchisement, policies that continue until today, and we need to take it seriously."
Remember, she was asked a direct question about the Boston Marathon bomber. That's where her mind went: Jim Crow. Jahar Tsarnaev is a victim.
But you know what? Never mind!
Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris changes her tune about letting convicted terrorists vote in U.S. elections less than 24 hours after being asked about it during a CNN town hall. pic.twitter.com/XMqeVNkgUm
Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) April 24, 2019
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Heels Up Harris is an anchor baby. She isn’t a natural born citizen and is therfore ineligible for the office of the Presidency.
She's the type that she'll support whatever is "cool" at the the moment and I guess the snap polls came back and the loonies didn't come out on top.
I wonder how Stephen Colbert would pronounce it.
I bet it would be something like “Willie Brown’s c*** holster”.
That’s how you would describe her, right, Stephen?
It sounds alien, which she is, seeing as how she is not eligible.
The “Biden Effect”?
Clarified??? Wolf, you mean changed.
A lot of Libs think the entire WORLD should be able to select our President.
So far (and it’s early) she is a surprisingly poor candidate.
I had the impression in January that she was The Chosen One. If that’s true, something happened to cause the hidden movers to take a step back.
I suspect that it can be proven that she collaborated before the fact with the Jussie Smollett hoax, and that the powers that be know it could be proven if things break just right.
If you know that, then you also know that, for the powers that be, that does not matter at all.
What a natural leader this mattress ornament is!
—
I don’t know if the word “ornament” is correct.
Would you buy a mattress that she “slept” on?
What did Camela do? Consult Willies staff, again?
Outlaws have placed themselves outside of the bounds of the law. Therefore outside the protections and privileges of the law.
What an incredible flake
First she say’s she will and then she don’t. Sounds like a lyric to a song.....
We only have as much Constitution as they will allow?
We only have as much Constitution as we are able to take back from them.
It is not a magic, self-enforcing rulebook.
“They must have done polling and found that one - sounds like Pamela - is more innocuous than the other, which is vaguely Arabic. “
That makes sense. One sounds American and the other vaguely reminds one of terrorists.
Point taken!
Perhaps she is just a mattress stain.
My eyes must be off this morning. When I first read your comment, I thought it said "Willie Brown's mattress".
No the question needs to be “would you allow Hitler to vote?” Turn the tables on them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.