John Brennan must be held accountable for his role in advancing the Russia hoax

The president has been exonerated on allegations of Russian collusion, and now, as investigators and the media pick up the pieces on the long-running hoax, more attention has turned to the major players behind the operation, including former CIA chief and current NBC “analyst” John Brennan, who played an integral role in the launch of the unprecedented surveillance operation — and the smear campaign thereafter — against the president, members of the Trump campaign, and Trump-connected individuals.

Brennan’s personal role in the Trump-Russia collusion saga dates back to at least the summer of 2016 (and perhaps even earlier) when he met with a top British intelligence chief to discuss Trump’s supposed ties to the Russians. Around the time of that meeting, and following its conclusion, American and foreign spies began to make contact with members of the Trump campaign, with some claiming to have access to Russian secrets involving the Hillary Clinton campaign. Brennan later seemed to take credit and defend the espionage operation, which again, relied on the dossier to legitimize spying on Americans.

Brennan, as CIA director, reportedly inserted the Clinton-funded-and-manufactured Steele dossier into a draft version of the highly scandalous Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian interference, which was published under the auspices of Donald Trump’s political opponents in early January 2017, just two weeks before President-elect Trump took office.

In March, citing a “high-level source,” Sen. Rand Paul said that Brennan “insisted that the unverified and fake Steele dossier” be included in the ICA.

Somebody needs to explain who the “real” John Brennan is. Is he a brilliant CIA leader/operative or just bureaucratic, asskissing incompetent with friends in high places.

Also, under what conditions did he vote for Gus Hall the Communist Party USA leader in (reports differ), 1980 or 84, when the Party was still an arm of the KGB and the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU)?

Was he an “elector” (which means he had to be a Party member) or “registered voter” which could mean he was a covert member or just some dumb schmuck who was lucky enough to avoid being fingered during his CIA career. Or was his Party voting covered up by the Church Committee/Adm. Stansfield Turner emasculated FBI/CIA credentials review committee?

Is he a secret Moslem? Today that is an important question considering how his leadership of the CIA missed so many obvious things re the Soviet Union/Russia, Al Qaeda (asleep at the wheel), ISIS, etc.

[The same goes for James Clapper, the clapper-less bell ringer of the DNI).

His role in Dossiergate (and perhaps UraniumOne and Benghazi fiascos) need to be fully explored, exposed and publicized, esp. before the Sen. Judiciary Committee where his lies will be exposed, not covered up by the now-NutCase led House Judiciary Committee.

There is more to Brennan than meets the eye. Time to open those eyes and see what is really behind that smug psychopath’s smile.

In the same interview, Woodward also said that Brennan and Clapper must be investigated.

My question was/is about what Woodward knows and when did he know it? If he knew about the fabricated dossier and fake FISA warrants, why did he wait until the Mueller investigation was over. To me, it sounds like Woodward should be testifying in front of congress, especially the senate side and in front of the IG.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.