[DeweyCA]

There is no reasonable comparison between what Bill Clinton did and what Trump did, and the Dems' reaction. It is only a contrast. Clinton was clearly guilty on multiple counts, while Trump is not guilty of any counts.

[ClearCase_guy]

Democrats want to live in a “Heads I win, Tails you lose” world.

The narrative says Trump should not be president. All else follows.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Trump is not “guilty of any counts” BECAUSE HE WASNT CHARGED WITH A CRIME!!

There were NO “counts.”

[South Dakota]

We should remember that the impeachment charges the House considered werr related to Clintons conduct with monica but the house began impeachment proceedings a year before anyone knew monica’s name.

The Gephardt led House democrats refused to consider any other charges but the ones related to monica

[an amused spectator]

I don’t see a principled basis on which this position can be reconciled with the nearly unanimous opposition of Democrats to Bill Clinton’s impeachment in the 1990s.

The great thing about no term limits is that there are approximately FORTY lying gasbag Democrat hypocrites in the US Congress who could see no crimes that were committed by Bill Clinton, when he CLEARLY committed crimes.

Fat Nads Nadler, the lying hypocrite gasbag Democrat Hutt, is chief among the scum who won't be called out by the Democrat Media Machine for his lies and complete 180 on "obstruction" from 1998 to 2019.

[dhs12345]

Liberals point to Clinton and his subsequent impeachment as the reason for the Trump investigations. It started before that with the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings. Democrats were all about #metoo with Thomas and not so much with Clinton. Clearly, it has nothing to do qith women’s rights with Democrats and everything to do with power.

[Nateman]

Not one stinking RAT Senator voted gulity. Not one. If you did not know RATs were organized crime, after that there was no denying it.

[Syncro]

Starr protected Clinton

[Responsibility2nd]

Bump.