Posted on 04/18/2019 8:18:43 AM PDT by hardspunned
https://t.co/703tzroquz
Verified account @CNNPolitics 8s8 seconds ago More
President Trump told his White House lawyer to remove special counsel Robert Mueller. He refused. https://cnn.it/2Xj53xq
Surely this has been known to Nadler, which he would have gleefully gotten from all the biased Dems Mueller had hired.
Nadler was looking forward to aligning his interrogation scripts with all the innuendos those Dems had larded into their report.
There is NOTHING in those ten items that I would not have done.
To find out a Special Council is appointed....GEEEZ US...
THAT IS MILD IN COMPARISON TO WHAT I WOULD HAVE SAID AND DONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The rest are his tweets and public remarks...where the he!! is all this secretive OBSTRUCTION CRAP??????
Mueller should be ashamed of himself for this BIASED reaching going as far as it did.
What our poor President went through, knowing all the while that he was innocent.
I've been saying for two years that this is factually incorrect.
MAGA was "put on hold" because most members of Congress -- Democrats and Republicans alike -- had no interest in advancing Trump's agenda.
I would challenge anyone here (as I've done in the past) to name a single Trump policy matter that was NOT implemented because of the Mueller investigation.
The answer is: NONE. Anything that wasn't implemented was derailed for other reasons.
This report is a joke. It reads like it was written by the DNC.
“By no later than April 12, 2016, the GRU had gained access to the DCCC computer network using the credentials stolen from a DCCC employee who had been successfully spearfished the week before.”
Why don’t they just name Podesta? But this language makes it sound so much more sinister.
Trump DOES talk like that ... when he’s carrying on a fake tirade for the purpose of optics. LOL.
The collusion investigation was just used as a way to frame Trump for obstruction. In reading the report it is obvious that is what they were doing. All the high profile raids, leaks etc didn’t need to happen but did to see if they could get Trump to react. Really sick group... And started with bullshit and perpetuated by bad actors.
ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: Did Mueller investigate or discuss ANY OF THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY OBAMA, COMEY, LYNCH, YATES, BRENNAN, HILLARY, MCCABE, THE OHRS, STRZOK, PAGE, MILLS, RICE, POWER, STEELE, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH?!!!!!!!
It doesn’t matter what’s actually in the report. Trump haters will invent their own versions.
The answer is: NONE. Anything that wasn't implemented was derailed for other reasons.
While I don't disagree completely, I think it's difficult to quantify the level of opposition that was strengthened by the possibility that Mueller would return a scathing report, and possibly remove the president. Sure, there has been plenty of opposition on partisan grounds, and many in the GOP are wishy-washy, but they had to be somewhat emboldened with the bad news that came out about Trump during the entire investigation.
Trump never had the use of his full authority as long as Mueller worked in the background. All the Democrats, and probably some of the Republicans thought they could wait him out.
awesome...
I am going to start a pool on how many times congressional Dems and the media uses the word “Watergate” relative to Mueller’s report not exculpating Trump on an obstruction charge while finding no evidence that he could be convicted of the same. My guess is 1.4 billion times. Sorry, gents, it’s not as if Mueller found his dna on a dress
I am going to start a pool on how many times congressional Dems and the media uses the word “Watergate” relative to Mueller’s report not exculpating Trump on an obstruction charge while finding no evidence that he could be convicted of the same. My guess is 1.4 billion times. Sorry, gents, it’s not as if Mueller found his dna on a dress
“By no later than April 12, 2016, the GRU had gained access to the DCCC computer network using the credentials stolen from a DCCC employee who had been successfully spearfished the week before.”
Why don’t they just name Podesta? But this language makes it sound so much more sinister.
No kidding.
Imagine if Mueller had said, "John Podesta fell for a common phishing request, and gave away all his emails to the Russians without even knowing it." More factual than what was actually in the report.
Well off the top of my head...
1. Border Wall.
2. Investigating Clinton (Lock her up)
3. Complete repeal of ObamaCare.
Yes, The Uniparty is and was working against Trump. But things would be 10 times better if it were not for Sessions and Mueller.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.