A. Some worker has already admitted that he screwed up.
B. It might be arson. But the French cops don't want to tip their hand.
C. They want it to be an accident. So it's going to be an accident.
In the same manner that President Kennedy’s suicide was investigated?
Accident? Yeah, sure.
12 vandalism of French Churches in a week, indicates an “accident”?
No matter how it happened, it will be an accident.
The West has surrendered.
Mrs. O’Muhammad’s camel kicked over a lantern.
Has England chimed in with, “Hey, it’s all part and parcel.”
Even if it was not arson or terrorism it was no “accident”. There are no accidents. Someone is to blame.
It’ll be ruled an accident no matter what the evidence shows.
It’s the same with any terrorist attack these days. Can’t have the msm or politicians saying anything other than it was an accident and not terrorism within 5 minutes.
becoming more and more disappointed with Fox news
Some good reasons to be suspicious—
1. The fire took place during holy week.
2. No workers were there today and the church was closed.
3. ISIS tried to blow up a car outside the church in 2016.
4. Vandalism and desecration of french churches (and synagogues) has been on the rise.
if it ends up being Muslim arson will the french reveal that truth or cover it up?
Prosecutors: “We are going into this investigation with some very specific assumptions and biases and will consider carefully all evidence which either directly or indirectly confirm those biases and assumptions or can be construed to do so. This will become our best evidence available. Any evidence which is not aligned with our biases and assumptions is most likely going to be found to be contradictory, coincidental, or circumstantial and will be treated accordingly. Thank you.”
https://barenakedislam.com/2019/04/16/clearly-nothing-to-see-here-folks-so-what-was-that-guy-in-white-muslim-attire-doing-at-notre-dame-cathedral-when-it-went-up-in-flames/ this needs to be explained
I choose C.
It’s sort of like when a black guy throws a 5-year-old white kid over a rail, and the cops and media are busily scratching their heads wondering what the motive was.
They said this yesterday while the building was still on fire. That tells me they already suspect muslims.
another news source is reporting that there was an alarm sounded before the big fire... a fire team came to look but found no fire and left......
could this be a confusion of “two fires”?
or did they actually find a second fire in one of the towers too?
Shouldnt you just investigate and let the facts determine the cause?
C
I suggest investigating it as a fire, and see where things take you.
Rush is all over this right now....
When they went for “C” while the building was still on fire it became very obvious that the authorities already knew with 100% certainty that it was arson by Muslims. They started trying to bury the truth before the rest of us could even reach any conclusions.