Posted on 04/14/2019 3:33:06 PM PDT by upchuck
... Media Matters for America accused Mr. Dilanian of repeatedly misgendering Ms. Manning by using he/him pronouns during two broadcasts covering the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Thursday.
According to clips posted by Media Matters and Mediaite, Mr. Dilanian indeed used he and him when referring to Ms. Manning on MSNBC Live with Stephanie Ruhle and MSNBC Live with Hallie Jackson.
... Chelsea Manning was an Army private stationed in Iraq, he was downloading hundreds of thousands of top-secret U.S. government files from the military and from the State Department, and he was sending them to Assange and WikiLeaks to make public, Mr. Dilanian said later.
Media Matters, a left-wing nonprofit, says misgendering trans people is a tactic used by right-wing media and extreme anti-LGBTQ groups to invalidate trans identities.
The act has been described as completely draining to a trans persons mental health, and it can trigger anxiety, depression and gender dysphoria, Media Matters said in its reporting on Mr. Dilanians comments.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
“It” is the only logical compromise.
Along with “mentally challenged”.
Sorry, but dat’s the truth.
Bradley manning is a traitor. He sold out his country because he is a horrible leftist.
JoMa
“She” was he at the time.
misgendering trans people...
I would think a gender neutral term would work best.
I would suggest the term “it” is most apt.
Does he/she have a Y-chromosome?
Yes,
Thats was IT!
Where do they CBS find these weirdos?
Oh lord, why did I have to see that again?
[ Where do they CBS find these weirdos? ]
I had to look to see what you were talking about.
Wow.
“Manning should be in prison, in a psych ward, not out with the general population.”
Should be in general pop so maybe some patriot will take care of the problem. Gonna happen sooner or later.
“Cousin It” works.
I prefer the all inclusive term "She, He, It or Transgendered," or I simply use the acronym "S.H.I.T."
Take pride, Youre inclusive
... Media Matters for America accused Mr. Dilanian of repeatedly misgendering Ms. Manning...
Doesn’t matter, HE will always have male chromosomes therefore HE will always be a HE.
I was wondering....how does an Army private get access to hundreds of thousands of top-secret government files from the military and State Department in the first place?
He/she/it should have faced a firing squad.
This poor man, after seeing the result of toxic masculinity in war, wants to be a female and make everything right... his mind is not right. It is a crime to not try and help him with his delusion.
Actually, the reporter is guilty of using the wrong first name, not miss gendering.
Bradley Manning didn’t announce his re-gendering until just before the court-martial as I recall. So, historically, Bradley Manning was a he until the very moment when he decided to become a she and announced to the world that her name was now Chelsey.
Prior to the announcement, Manning functioned as a male and it is entirely appropriate to refer to “him” when speaking of that time period. Once the announcement was made, then respect for the wishes of the newly minted, fragile Chelsey Manning personality requires use of “she” going forward from that point.
So, as stated at the beginning, use historically appropriate name and gender pronouns (e.g., Bradley and him) when referring to the period before the announcement of a person’s transition and the current name and requested gender pronouns (e.g., Chelsey and her) from the time afterward. Admittedly, this would get a little awkward because, in the interest of proper usage and accuracy, you now must closely interrogate each transsexual person you interact with on the precise point in their life when they decided the gender corresponding to their biological sex was a mistake and they announced their intention to transition.
Of course, it can also get a little ackward when writing, say, a flash back:
“Try as she might, Chelsey could not remember the precise moment when Bradly decided to betray his country.”
Out of context, the unenlightened, the “unwoke” reader might make the now unforgivable mistake of thinking two separate persons were being written about.
It is even worse, for the non-binaries want to use “their,” “they” and “them” as singular personal pronouns. And if you were writing of a transsexual who subsequently decided they were really non-binary... well, the sentence above would then be rendered:
“Try as they might, Chelsey could not remember the precise moment when Bradly decided to betray their country.”
(Now we have a treasonous but memory-challenged couple. Or do we?)
However, I recommend drawing the line when one of the enlightened ones decides to draft you, the CIS male and CIS female, into the farce by using supposedly gender neutral made up third person pronouns when referring to you.
Be polite but just as aggressive as they are in insisting that only the gender-appropriate male and female pronouns be used in referring to you. And do not hesitate to threaten to report them to corporate HR or to the authorities (community HR commission or police) if they do not immediately respect your wishes.
Persist and do not heed their appeals for commity and accommodation. They certainly wouldn’t listen to yours if the situation were reversed.
“misgendering”
Insanity.
History proves the pronouns.
At the time of HIS assignment, HE was known as BRADLEY and consistently presented HIMSELF as a MAN, a person of the male sex.
What it the matter with what he said? These people are time-challenged. Manning, while in the Army, was a ‘he’. Case closed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.