Now We Know the Exact Lie Google CEO Told Congress (trunc)

Conservative Tribune by WJ ^ | April 11, 2019 | Josh Manning

[Twotone]

A political nuke has detonated in Silicon Valley, and Google is ground zero.

Late Tuesday, excerpts from a reportedly leaked internal Google document were published by The Daily Caller. The excerpts, if accurate, confirm what conservatives have long suspected — that conservatives are being actively suppressed by arguably the most powerful company in the world.

The Daily Caller reported that a Google blacklist of websites includes right-leaning publishers such as the Conservative Tribune (a property of The Western Journal), as well as “Gateway Pundit, Matt Walsh’s blog, Gary North’s blog ‘teapartyeconomist.com,’ Caroline Glick’s website … and the website of the American Spectator.”

The impact of this leak can hardly be overstated. Google is already reeling — and panicking, as the quality of its first response to the leak reflects — because of how bad this looks for a company that has vociferously denied rigging its products against conservatives.

But far and away the most devastating part of the leak, which Google doesn’t deny is authentic, appears to confirm that Google CEO Sundar Pichai either misleadingly parsed the truth or did, in fact, lie to a committee of the United States Congress.

[SunkenCiv]

Late Tuesday, excerpts from a reportedly leaked internal Google document were published by The Daily Caller... a Google blacklist of websites includes right-leaning publishers such as the Conservative Tribune (a property of The Western Journal), as well as “Gateway Pundit, Matt Walsh’s blog, Gary North’s blog ‘teapartyeconomist.com,’ Caroline Glick’s website … and the website of the American Spectator.”

It comes as no surprise that the bastard lied to Congress.

[KTM rider]

do know for 100% fact that Google manipulated the search results to cover up the facts of Benghazi, I watched it progress right before my eyes over a peiod of weeks and months.

the original trail of circumstantial evidence led to more than reasonable doubt that ambassador Stevens was purposely killed by the same Obama and Hillary operatives who they used to snuff Ghadaffy to cover up the facts before the 2008 election. No doubt in my mind it was an assassination bought and paid for by Hillary and Obama because Stevens was trying to get some of Libya's money returned to Libya for humanitarian projects. then the BBC and Al Jazeera news stories about it just went "POOF"

so did Hillary's e-mail trail

[KTM rider]

If the general public knew what actually happened in Benghazi (and Libya in general) then Obama would have lost in a landslide, no second term of "fundamental transformation"

people are still convinced there was no armed drone circling when Obama/hillary's hit squad descended on the compound to murder Stevens

However McCain wouldn't have been much better

I would say this is what GOOGLE is actually bragging about

[Tunehead54]

For later ... thanks.

[dynoman]

Jim Hoft is engaged!

[dynoman]

Jim Hoft is engaged!

[no-to-illegals]

Is truly doubtful that the democrats realize we’re on to their lies and deliberate fraud

[Chode]

yeah, true

[goldbux]

* * *