Posted on 04/11/2019 9:45:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
It isn’t that they “can’t handle the truth”, they just don’t want the rest of us to find out the truth.
/spī/
noun 1. a person who secretly collects and reports information on the activities, movements, and plans of an enemy or competitor.
.
...... Well ...... Looking at the above dictionary definition of the word ... "SPY" .... it is easy to see why the Democrats are busy attempting damage control before the Crap hits the proverbial fan ....
Hannity...Like him or lump him, he is one heck of a good Allie. Sometimes annoying with his repetitiveness on his talking points but that’s a-ok with me.
1) Genuine shock and contrition -- upset that Obama and Hillary might do such a thing, and a determination to make sure justice was done (we all know that this would never be their actual reaction)
2) The Claude Raines reaction from "Casablanca": feigned shock that such a thing could have happened, and a "sincere" promise that it won't happen again ("let's move on")
3) Counter-attacking because spying on Trump is morally correct and if the AG has a problem with domestic spying, then the AG should be destroyed.
The fact that the Dems are blatantly going with Option #3 is not surprising but it is really dismaying. They are seriously awful people.
Why is it that the Dems cannot handle AG Barr taking on issues that were committed by them?
Is it that they believe the connection is just like Obama/Holder? *
“”I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. So we’ll see,” Holder said in an interview on the Tom Joyner radio show.” 4/4/13
McConnell will squash any charges.
Targeting a campaign is the same as targeting the people. Had they been successful in removing trump, it would be tantamount to denying the vote to all who voted for him.
Ballots or bullets.
I wish he had not said “I think.” If he knows, he should have just said that it occurred. If he is not sure, he should have said only that he was looking into the matter. As it is, the Rats will say that he showed bias in favor of the charge.
Their anger is going to increase when they hear the names hillary and obama being in the middle of this.
They get upset over “spying”.. they are in for a treat... a new awakening informative treat!
Today the script is “it was NOT spying!” By the end of next week, they will have pivoted to “everybody does it.”
“What did the President know and when did he know it?”
This question MUST be asked incessantly, just as it was back during Watergate.
Until and unless many of these criminals go to prison the Justice dept. FBI, IRS etc are ALL Crappola.
“It isn’t that they “can’t handle the truth”, they just don’t want the rest of us to find out the truth.”
Beat me to it.
The Left has always been about manipulating the public with lies, to gain political power.
Being a good liar, and effectively promoting the Party’s “narrative”, are the main criteria for selecting their candidates. They have been competing with each other on that basis for their whole careers.
Karl Marx himself extensively and consciously falsified the facts to support his big sweet sounding lie, explicitly designed to help take power (he was a failed and exiled coup plotter, before he even set about dreaming up a more effective platform narrative).
Lying is the fundamental basis of the Left - all the vanguard of the Party know it. The rest are just useful idiots.
How dare Barr accuse them of what they’ve been doing!
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Clapper admit that the Trump campaign was spied upon? And weren’t there 4 FISA warrants authorizing the spying? I thought so.
4) Insisting that what was previously reported in plain sight actually never, in hindsight, happened, and demanding that those who still think so publicly recant, apologize, and genuflect to the Democrat party line.
That's where the Democrats go with everything. It's not enough for them to destroy someone; they first want the person to totally supplicate themselves to the righteous superiority of the Democrats before being destroyed.
-PJ
He had to because he had no evidence to present in that meeting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.