Already posted but my excerpting is better. ;-D (23 minute read, according to the site.)
1 posted on
04/07/2019 12:01:29 PM PDT by
NobleFree
To: NobleFree
Destroying the Electoral College: The Anti-Federalist National Popular Vote SchemeAmerica needs Mob Rule.
Oh wait, ... America needs MORE Mob Rule.
2 posted on
04/07/2019 12:07:05 PM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
To: NobleFree
State Compact attacts Federal
Likewise
County District Compact attacks State & their compact
... Counties get moving ...
3 posted on
04/07/2019 12:08:42 PM PDT by
TheNext
(Democrats kill people with Gun Control)
To: NobleFree
What next if states try to adopt this?
4 posted on
04/07/2019 12:09:21 PM PDT by
lucky american
(Progressives are attac Iking our rights and y'all will sit there and take it.)
To: NobleFree
it is fascinating, imho, that the proponents of this scheme deliberately avoided any of the several constitutional means for getting what they wanted
6 posted on
04/07/2019 12:10:22 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: NobleFree
Most other analyses miss the key issue emphasized here: Can the states bypass the Constitutional amendment process when they object to a provision of the Constitution in a case that clearly contradicts the Founders’ intent?
The answer is that they cannot, at least without nullifying the rest of the Constitution as well.
Too many people argue secondary issues instead of this main one.
8 posted on
04/07/2019 12:13:05 PM PDT by
jjotto
(Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
To: NobleFree
Also, each state was guaranteed a “republican form of government.” This pact changes the state into a Hugo Chavez style democracy, where 51% dictate to the 49%.
To: NobleFree
Well its clear they are violating the Compact clause of the Constitution.
15 posted on
04/07/2019 12:30:30 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: NobleFree
The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (which controls bridges,tunnels and airports in the "Tri State" region) is a "compact" approved by Congress,as required in the Constitution.
This fraudulent plan isn't...and won't be.
19 posted on
04/07/2019 12:56:14 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Mitt Romney: Bringing Massachusetts Values To The Great State Of Utah.)
To: NobleFree
The only way to stop it is to win the majority. If Californias and New Yorks votes went to Trump because they did this they would rethink their strategy.
To: NobleFree
Very well argued.
Here’s a question for you: Suppose the Democrats take the Senate in 2020 (or 2022), and Congress APPROVES the NPV interstate compact?
Would that make it Constitutional?
26 posted on
04/07/2019 2:11:19 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2 = 4)
To: NobleFree
The only votes that will matter will be New York and California if the EC is dissolved.
And when those states give illegal aliens, felons in jail and crazy people the right to vote while scrubbing the ticket of Trump or anyone else conservative....well....
27 posted on
04/07/2019 2:17:23 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
To: NobleFree
It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence.
Second Amendment is fading fast
Free Speech and Association is getting hammered
Coinage went out the window
The Prog Fascists never rest
31 posted on
04/07/2019 2:48:13 PM PDT by
Macoozie
(Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
To: NobleFree
In 92 when Clinton won with less than 50% of the popular vote the Ministry of Truth blathered on and on about how wonderful the Electoral College was because it magnified and legitimized his victory.
32 posted on
04/07/2019 2:55:31 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: NobleFree
To: NobleFree
I can tell you forthright, if the mob of newyaklostangelsminesotastan wishes to lord over cajun empire, they’s gonns have presents of gator carcasses enuf fer a year!
To: NobleFree
So when does this get challenged in the courts — after the election? Would be a disaster.
37 posted on
04/07/2019 5:03:22 PM PDT by
nicollo
(I said no!)
To: NobleFree
The outcome is clear as the table is being set.
If the 2020 election is close to within 50 points, then the liberal progressives will force the states to side with their decision to go with popular vote. If so, then it WILL be a constitutional crisis. This might precipitate a civil war. Are youse guys are ready for this? Think hard before you answer.
Outcomes...
[1] DJT reelected by clear majority. Media has a hissy fit, Same old. Same old.
[2] DJT elected by narrow margin, democrats try to over turn using every method they can think of. DJT prevails. BLM and Antifa start throwing terrorist motivated temper tantrums.
[3] DJT elected by narrow margin. Democrats try to over turn election. RINO's back the democrats. DJT fights back - Civil War ignited.
[4] Democrat elected by clear majority. DJT steps down. Rinos go to their constituents and tell them all these great ideas they have to get back in power. Yada yada yada. Conservatives go home and do nothing. Progressive strangle hold is finalized during the first term of the new democrat president, and guns are banned within two years (after a gun-related false flag event in the first six months after the election). Conservatives turn in their guns, under the watchful eyes of their loved ones, and children who are organized by the schools to report non-comrade behaviors.
What do you think will happen? It is obvious that the stage is being set. I cannot see it pan out any other way.
41 posted on
04/09/2019 1:36:54 AM PDT by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson