Streisand's Bizarre Michael Jackson Defense

The Times of London published a sugary celebrity interview on March 21 titled "Barbra Streisand at 76: dog cloning, art collecting and being a grandma."

Social-media accounts have been whirring in outrage since it was discovered that Streisand had demonstrated such extreme sympathy for the late Michael Jackson that she ran down the men accusing him of sexually abusing them as young children in the new documentary "Leaving Neverland."

Streisand dismisses Jackson's pedophilia thusly: "His sexual needs were his sexual needs, coming from whatever childhood he has or whatever DNA he has.'' She even put the word "molested" in scare quotes. ''You can say 'molested,' but those children, as you heard say, they were thrilled to be there. They both married and they both have children, so it didn't kill them.''

She added she found Jackson "very sweet, very childlike" when she met him, and ''I blame, I guess, the parents, who would allow their children to sleep with him."

For anyone who wondered how Hollywood could accept sexual assault on women and children in the entertainment industry for many decades, here is Exhibit A. She didn't deny the sexual abuse. She said they were "thrilled to be there."

Streisand half-walked away from these comments to The New York Times. ''The single most important role of being a parent is to protect their children,'' she said. ''It's clear that the parents of the two young men were also victimized and seduced by fame and fantasy.''

That wasn't good enough, so hours later, the full apology came. ''I am profoundly sorry for any pain or misunderstanding I caused by not choosing my words more carefully about Michael Jackson and his victims,'' she said in the second statement. ''I didn't mean to dismiss the trauma these boys experienced in any way,'' it continued. ''Like all survivors of sexual assault, they will have to carry this for the rest of their lives."

This being Hollywood, she tried to tell the accusers she had just slimed that "I truly respect and admire them for speaking their truth.'' There is not "your" truth and "my" truth. There's just truth, and that's especially important in sex-abuse cases.

She can apologize for what she "meant" said all day long. But she callously suggested that an adult superstar's "sexual needs" were more important than the children's trauma.

If you didn't hear much about Streisand's pedophile face-plant, you could blame the media. It happened over a weekend, and some outlets -- CBS, NPR, PBS, and even CNN and MSNBC -- somehow couldn't find it. The ones that did report it were slow, and only covered it after the apology. ABC only offered a brief. NBC had a full report on Sunday night. The Washington Post blogged it, but didn't put it in the actual newspaper.

The media do not leap to call out liberal hypocrites. This is the same Streisand who deeply loved the Clintons, but calls President Donald Trump the "Groper in Chief."

They want to maintain the compassionate aura around Barbra Streisand, the feminist legend and die-hard Democrat. But this interview should not be tossed in a memory hole. This echo should resonate. In our celebrity-obsessed culture, celebrities shouldn't feel entitled to exploit children or excuse that exploitation just because they're rich and famous ... and favor the "correct" politicians.

I have read quite a bit about his life and, you are right, he was very abused. LaToya has been pretty vocal about the abuse in the family. Joe was a monster and the mother was a sick accomplice. I read in one of LaToya’s accounts that Joe molested his own daughters and beat his sons, especially Michael.

Abuse like that messes with minds, especially the naturally weak ones. It twists them up. Abuse is at the heart of most cases of same sex attraction because, when a person reaches sexual maturity, if they are unable to process the abuse correctly, it warps their libido and their view of themselves as sexual creatures and cause them to have inappropriate stimulus responses.

They can also be “stuck in time” at the point when the abuse occurred. Freud called this arrested development. While “experts” (read homosexualists) have tried to discredit Freud in this because it doesn’t fit their desired goal to completely normalize homosexual behavior, I believe it is entirely true. It is behind the childlike behavior that Michael exhibited his whole life.

I could see this years ago, even before the allegations and court case surfaced and knew that sexually deviant behavior was almost a certainty.

Although his mind was stuck in that state of immaturity, his sexual desire was not. Tragically, the parents of the, now men, in the documentary were lured in by the childlike behavior of Jackson and stupidly ignored the reality of his full grown, if warped, sex drive. That allowed the predictor in him easy access to the prey. What happened beyond that is classic sexual predator behavior.

Michael was an intelligent man. The works I have read by him are thoughtful and seem to give lie to the reality of his mental illness. He was also extremely talented. And he was very very tormented. I saw his plastic surgery as a way of letting the pitiful monster he saw within, show on the outside.

His tortured beginnings were not his fault. He was a victim of abuse. In the later years, though, the abuse he perpetrated was most definitely his fault. He was protected and shielded from blame because of his notoriety and talent. He was enabled. He should have been shunned and encouraged to seek help. There are quite a few factors that contribute, all of them bad.

I blame the parents of the victims for being dazzled by his celebrity and wooed to expose their children to this dark side. They should have seen it coming. They were selfish. Their kids have paid the price.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.