Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi, Dems unveil bill to bind Trump to Paris climate accord
The Hill ^ | March 27, 2019 | Mike Lillis, Miranda Green

Posted on 03/27/2019 12:18:32 PM PDT by jazusamo

House Democrats on Wednesday unveiled long-awaited legislation designed to reduce carbon emissions and take on climate change by binding the United States to commitments made under the Obama-era Paris climate accord.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) joined other Democrats in releasing the legislative package in the Capitol, framing climate change as "an existential threat" and promising that the party will move the legislation quickly to the floor.

“The American people know that the … crisis is an existential threat of our generation, of our time, a crisis manifested in natural disasters of epic proportions,” she said.

The five-page bill known as the Climate Action Now Act aims to block President Trump from pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement reached by the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 under former President Obama. Under the bill, Trump would also have to submit a new plan to Congress outlining how the U.S. will continue to meet the goals established in the Paris agreement.

Trump has said the accord threatens the economic prosperity of industries in the U.S., and that he intends to withdraw from the agreement in November 2020 – the earliest he’s legally permitted to do so.

Since taking office, Trump has allowed his administration to circumvent the carbon-cutting goals laid out by the agreement.

The Democrats’ bill comes from Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), chairwoman of the House Select Committee on Climate Crisis, a panel that Pelosi created at the start of the year following calls from progressives for a more concerted effort in the Democratic-led House to tackle climate change.

The issue has created some territorial tensions within the party, as leaders of the committees with jurisdiction over climate initiatives have fought to maintain their authority over how the Democrats proceed. The tensions forced Pelosi to balance those concerns with those of advocacy groups pressing for a more aggressive approach to environmental protection. She did so by creating the special committee, without giving it the ability to issue subpoenas like other panels.

Castor on Wednesday said tackling climate change is “a moral obligation” facing Congress, framing the new legislation as just the first step of a much broader Democratic effort to address the global crisis.

The bill will be marked up in the various committees of jurisdiction “over the coming weeks,” Castor said, and come to the floor afterwards.

The rollout of the bill comes a day after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) brought a vote on another climate bill — the Green New Deal — which was designed to put Democrats on the record on legislation lobbied by progressives that’s emerging as a litmus test for 2020 presidential candidates.

Democratic leaders called it a “sham” vote, noting the absence of hearings on the legislation. And Senate Democrats sought to defuse any controversy surrounding the bill by largely voting present on the floor.

The Green New Deal resolution, which many Democrats view as aspirational, at best, largely aims to jumpstart U.S. economic growth by transitioning the country’s electric grid to 100 percent renewable energy by 2030.

Pelosi has long declined to say whether she intends to bring a vote on the House’s version of the Green New Deal resolution, championed by freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).

Following a call by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) in early March to hold a hearing on the resolution, Pelosi promised there would be debate on some climate bill, but didn’t say which one.

Ocasio-Cortez herself has not made calls for her resolution to be marked up or brought to the floor. Instead her office is working on new piece-meal bills that would address specific policies laid out in the broader plan. Those bills aren’t expected until early next year, her staff told The Hill.

The climate fight has been decidedly partisan. And the Democrats on Wednesday were quick to bash Trump's intent to leave the Paris climate accord, which he announced as president in 2017.

Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), chairwoman of the Science, Space and Technology Committee, said Trump's decision to withdraw from that agreement "is both misguided and ill-advised."

"Rather than pretend that the human-induced climate change doesn't exist, we need to do all that we can to work to meet the goals of the Paris agreement," she said.

The select committee on climate change boasts a number of young freshmen members, who used Wednesday's rollout of H.R. 9 to argue the importance of preserving the environment for the health of future generations.

Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.), a 40-year-old former environmental activist, said Congress must "embrace the scientific consensus" that climate change "is driven by human active" — and inaction by American policymakers "would be catastrophic."

Rep. Joe Neguse (D), a 34-year-old representing Boulder, Colo., warned that Congress has "a very short runway to avoid very catastrophic consequences for our planet."

And Rep. Sean Casten (Ill.), a 47-year old former clean energy executive, accused Trump and Republicans of "ignoring the single most serious threat to the existence of human life on earth."

"From Normandy to the Cold War, American leadership has been about identifying long-term existential threats to the entire population, and then leading the rest of the world to mobilize around a shared set of goals and values," he said.

"That's what we need."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; hr9; parisclimateaccord; pelosi; presidenttrump; trump; ushouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2019 12:18:32 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

IIRC, if congress won’t make it a proper treaty, then it isn’t a treaty.


2 posted on 03/27/2019 12:19:43 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Kabuki theater. They know it can’t do diddly..................


3 posted on 03/27/2019 12:19:57 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s the SUN, idiots. CO2 is plant food.


4 posted on 03/27/2019 12:19:59 PM PDT by beethovenfan (Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

tax scams and socialism are the existential threat.


5 posted on 03/27/2019 12:20:47 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I hope we have enough sane Republicans in Congress to make sure this doesn’t pass.


6 posted on 03/27/2019 12:20:53 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yep, Pelosi is whistling past the graveyard.


7 posted on 03/27/2019 12:21:49 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Unconstitutional on its face: the Congress cannot interfere with the President’s diplomatic authority, which is intrinsic to the office.


8 posted on 03/27/2019 12:22:13 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Dead as hell on arrival. Why do they waste taxpayer money on crap?


9 posted on 03/27/2019 12:22:31 PM PDT by bingoplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Totally clueless. The Senate ratifies treaties.


10 posted on 03/27/2019 12:23:02 PM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If, through some miracle, this geta to President Trump’s desk for signature, I will thoroughly enjoy his second VETO!

*SNORT* Pelosi is nuts.


11 posted on 03/27/2019 12:23:25 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin ( "Why can't you be more like Lloyd Braun?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Democrats are an existential threat to to this country and the freedom and prosperity that it spreads around the world. The poverty and deprivation that the Left would bring on would kill untold millions and enslave many more.


12 posted on 03/27/2019 12:23:50 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Stupid posturing. The Senate, not the House, verifies treaties. And if this idiot screed passed Trump would veto it so fast the speed of light couldn’t catch up.


13 posted on 03/27/2019 12:24:06 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Keeps them from doing stuff that might actually have a chance of passing.


14 posted on 03/27/2019 12:24:50 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nice try, Nancypants.


15 posted on 03/27/2019 12:25:06 PM PDT by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s really just cover for their base. So they can say ‘We Tried!’..................


16 posted on 03/27/2019 12:25:11 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’ll pass the House and die in the Senate. And even if it makes it through the Senate it will be vetoed by Trump. This is all kabuki theater for the 2020 elections.


17 posted on 03/27/2019 12:25:49 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

True. All these ‘bills’ are going nowhere and they know it. It’s just to feed their idiot base.....................


18 posted on 03/27/2019 12:26:06 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The House can bind a country to a treaty? News to me. DOA.


19 posted on 03/27/2019 12:26:08 PM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So napa nan is into ‘bdsm’ then? Figures.


20 posted on 03/27/2019 12:27:15 PM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson