Skip to comments.
A Skeptic’s Guide to the Russiagate Fixation
https://www.thenation.com ^
| march 12 2019
| A Mate
Posted on 03/16/2019 2:14:04 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
Robert Mueller has yet to allege collusion, and Democrats who accuse Trump of being a Kremlin conspirator are silent when his policies escalate tensions with Russia.
To date, Muellers numerous indictments and voluminous court filings have not accused a single American of collusion with Russia. And, tellingly, prominent media and political voices, who have spent two years raising expectations that Mueller will find collusion, are now quietly moving the goalposts.
If this is the most damning evidence that the Democrats top Russia investigators can adduce, it is no wonder that the bipartisan Senate Intelligence probe has uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, as NBC News reported last month. And amid rumblings that Mueller is wrapping up his investigation, it is also no wonder that Schiff and others who have ceaselessly promoted the Trump-Russia collusion theory are preparing their audiences for a letdown.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenation.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bubkis; democrats; fakenews; impeachment; muellerprobe; nothingburger; russiagate; russiancollusion; scandal; stalkinghorse; thenation; trump; trumprussia; wretchedtravesty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-148 next last
To: philman_36
ONCE AGAIN FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME I`LL ANSWER:
Who am I, Im me.
Your modus operandi is tedious and juvenile. QTroll, doxx in the fr sense, then immaturely attempt the I-post-last-so-I-win gambit
101
posted on
03/16/2019 1:56:24 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
Poor little you! You need others to carry your water for you?
Can't fight your own battles?
Obviously not or you wouldn't throw other people's replies out at me.
You're still not answering the question.
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
102
posted on
03/16/2019 1:58:08 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
ONCE AGAIN FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME I`LL ANSWER:
Who am I, Im me.
Your modus operandi is tedious and juvenile. QTroll, doxx in the fr sense, then immaturely attempt the I-post-last-so-I-win gambit.
103
posted on
03/16/2019 1:59:09 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
ONCE AGAIN FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME I`LL ANSWER:
Who am I, Im me.And yet, once again, FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME, you're still not answering the question. What authority do you have?
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
104
posted on
03/16/2019 2:24:45 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
Your modus operandi is tedious and juvenile. QTroll, doxx in the fr sense, then immaturely attempt the I-post-last-so-I-win gambit.
105
posted on
03/16/2019 2:26:25 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: philman_36
Excuse me, but at what point since the thread was posted did you come to imagine the thread was about you? Is the subject of the thread as originally posted outside of your reasoning level?
106
posted on
03/16/2019 2:31:29 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: Para-Ord.45
...attempt the I-post-last-so-I-win gambit.I'm not engaged in a gambit. I'm asking a question that deserves an answer.
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
107
posted on
03/16/2019 2:33:31 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
You deserve nothing.You`ve totally invest your reputation on a hoax and deserve, nothing.
You demand.
Who are you to demand anything,Lavrentiy Beria or Veruca Salt.
108
posted on
03/16/2019 2:36:37 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
You`ve totally invest your reputation on a hoax and deserve, nothing.Another assertion, nothing more.
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
109
posted on
03/16/2019 2:43:20 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
Yeah, you don`t believe pours is sending you breadcrumbs on a chanporn site./sarc off
Who are you to demand anything,Lavrentiy Beria or Veruca Salt.
Hence your new name QTroll, BeriaSalt.
LOL
110
posted on
03/16/2019 2:45:18 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
111
posted on
03/16/2019 2:45:33 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
You deserve nothing.
You demand.In the same reply no less.
Now you have two questions.
Where have I demanded anything?
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
112
posted on
03/16/2019 2:49:30 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
Who are you to demand answers.
Who are you to ask leading questions.
Who are you to QTroll.
Where have you requested anything.
BeriaSalt.Grand InQuisitor .
113
posted on
03/16/2019 2:59:20 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
I see you don't know how to ask a question.
It makes it easier to understand why you won't answer questions either.
Now you have two questions.
Where have I demanded anything?
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
114
posted on
03/16/2019 3:04:51 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
LOL@ “I see you don’t know how to ask a question. “
I was wrong, I apologize. You aren’t obtuse.
YOUR JUST PLAIN DUMB AS A STUMP
LOL
DOESN`T EVEN RECOGNIZE RHETORICAL.
LOL@BeriaSalt.Grand InQuisitor .
115
posted on
03/16/2019 3:07:32 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
DOESN`T EVEN RECOGNIZE RHETORICAL.Doesn't even recognize that there are no question marks.
Now you have two questions.
Where have I demanded anything?
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
116
posted on
03/16/2019 3:11:40 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
LOL@”Doesn’t even recognize that there are no question marks.”
Ergo, rhetorical.
LOL Unbelievably imbecilic BeriaSalt, grand inquisitor.
117
posted on
03/16/2019 3:17:32 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
Ergo, rhetorical.There first has to be a question in order for the question to be a rhetorical question.
You didn't ask a question, rhetorical or otherwise,
4 times in a row one right after the other.
And a rhetorical question is one in which you don't expect an answer to be given so even if you go back now and put question marks on them it is clear now that you
intended for them to be rhetorical questions and you didn't expect them to be answered and you only asked them 'for effect'.
Now you have two questions.
Where have I demanded anything?
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
118
posted on
03/16/2019 3:27:01 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
LOL@ “There first has to be a question in order for the question to be a rhetorical question. “
A question marked in not needed to engage in rhetoric.
Obvious your ignorant of the rhetoric in use. Was I using rhetorical strategies, frame analysis, analytic method, etc.
No one is required to answer leading questions QTrolls engage in mush like you ignored my questions regarding your belief in Q and 30,000 criminal indictments etal.
119
posted on
03/16/2019 3:36:12 PM PDT
by
Para-Ord.45
(Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
To: Para-Ord.45
A question marked (sic)
in not needed to engage in rhetoric.I agree, though knowing the difference between rhetoric and rhetorical
is needed to engage in rhetoric.
rhetoric
1 : the art of speaking or writing effectively: such as a : the study of principles and rules of composition formulated by critics of ancient times b : the study of writing or speaking as a means of communication or persuasion
2a : skill in the effective use of speech
However, when one asks a question, which is usually signified by "who" or "where" in the sentence structure, as you did, one must of needs place a question mark at the end of said sentence in order for it to be construed as a question when writing...which you didn't do. See "asked" below.
rhetorical
1 a: of, relating to, or concerned with rhetoric b : employed for rhetorical effect especially : asked merely for effect with no answer expected a rhetorical question
Now you still have two questions.
Where have I demanded anything?
Who are you to tell me where I can and cant go on FR?
120
posted on
03/16/2019 3:57:53 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson