[philman_36]

Ergo, rhetorical.
There first has to be a question in order for the question to be a rhetorical question.
You didn't ask a question, rhetorical or otherwise, 4 times in a row one right after the other.
And a rhetorical question is one in which you don't expect an answer to be given so even if you go back now and put question marks on them it is clear now that you intended for them to be rhetorical questions and you didn't expect them to be answered and you only asked them 'for effect'.

Now you have two questions.
Where have I demanded anything?
Who are you to tell me where I can and can’t go on FR?

[Para-Ord.45]

LOL@ “There first has to be a question in order for the question to be a rhetorical question. “

A question marked in not needed to engage in rhetoric.
Obvious your ignorant of the rhetoric in use. Was I using rhetorical strategies, frame analysis, analytic method, etc.

No one is required to answer leading questions QTrolls engage in mush like you ignored my questions regarding your belief in Q and 30,000 criminal indictments etal.