Triggered!
I assume he drove a car to the school, are they going to sue the car manufacturer?
He had clothes and shoes on. Will the clothing and shoe companies be sued as well?
IIRC, in an actual honest court FOPA86 will result in this being quashed.
This is stupid.....................
“Remington glorified the weapon in marketing it to young people.”
That’s their argument? Then sue Hollywood and rappers for “glorifying” violence. Sandy Fake Hook..
Triggered!
This ruling is BS.
It wasn’t his fun. He didn’t buy it. It was his mother’s that she bought, used and stored properly.
He stole it and shot her.
There is NOTHING, in any way shape or form, that makes this company or its adevertising liable for this.
This would create an interesting situation for blacks being shot by cops, you could basically sue in that situation as well. Even in a war-zone, you could find legal representation and claim the gun-makers sold weapons of war to harm you.
This would create an interesting situation for blacks being shot by cops, you could basically sue in that situation as well. Even in a war-zone, you could find legal representation and claim the gun-makers sold weapons of war to harm you.
Wasn’t his rifle. Advertising doesn’t apply here.
So we can sue Gay movies and TV shows for causing AIDS?
This sort of grasping/phishing for something, anything to sue a party for usually is indicative of an immediately unseen target. Perhaps in this case the marketing industry for some purpose of control.
It’s difficult to bring the target to focus, but there’s something being sought from this more than just controlling guns. It’s marketing, but of what, or perhaps to establish government control over marketing. Perhaps opening a new field of profitable litigation.
The mother of the child-killer is culpable, are the families going after her or just the nearest “deep-pocket”?
In a sane world this will be overturned.
I could have sworn that Bushmaster was sold to Cerberus, as was Remington. I wonder why the defendant wasn’t/isn’t Cerberus? Being the owner of three Bushmasters, and several other AR15s, perhaps I am liable for contributing to the delinquency of a mentally unstable person as he used a Bushmaster? Good thing I’ve got a few DPMS and Wyndham Weaponry. What a joke. I suppose the manner to stay liability free is to sit in a padded room with no outside contact.
Gwjack
Makes as much sense as suing the Bush family...
Its CT whah’dah you expect..just look at the crusty dyke holding the weapon,nuf said
This will get destroyed in the end.
So how much is Remington going to have to pay to defend themselves from this horse sh*t!
such a lawsuit is unconstitional anyway
and will either be thrown out of court, or overturned
The same people who would take away our firearms are the people who would leave our borders wide open. The Left is at war with us and we don’t even know it.
How do you successfully prosecute a manufacturer for marketing a legal weapon?
There’s no way in hell a crime was committed here!