Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House votes for Mueller report to be made public (420-0)
The Hill ^ | 03/14/2019 | JULIEGRACE BRUFKE AND MORGAN CHALFANT

Posted on 03/14/2019 10:20:46 AM PDT by GIdget2004

The House passed a resolution Thursday calling on Justice Department (DOJ) officials to release special counsel Robert Mueller’s highly anticipated report about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Lawmakers unanimously passed the nonbinding resolution in a 420-0 vote.

Four Republicans — Reps. Paul Gosar (Ariz.), Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Thomas Massie (Ky.), and Justin Amash (Mich.) — voted present.

“I’ve said to millions of Americans on television that I support releasing the Mueller report," Gaetz told The Hill on his decision to vote present.

“I take specific exception to the elements of the resolution noting praise for Mueller, without also noting the criticism of his very biased staffing decisions," he added. "It’s like he was fishing for talent in the Hillary Clinton fan club aquarium.”

The resolution calls for the Justice Department to release Mueller's report to Congress and the public.

The measure — introduced by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) — argues there is “overwhelming public interest” to release the contents of the high-profile report. The resolution calls on the department to fully release the report to Congress and to release it to the public “except to the extent the public disclosure of any portion thereof is expressly prohibited by law.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 03/14/2019 10:20:46 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Of course, half will be redacted for “national security” reasons.


2 posted on 03/14/2019 10:22:54 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Wow, a rare example of bi-partisanship.


3 posted on 03/14/2019 10:23:23 AM PDT by sevlex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I can’t wait until the doc dump that happens afterwards.


4 posted on 03/14/2019 10:23:28 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Who were the 15 who didn’t vote?


5 posted on 03/14/2019 10:23:56 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Nadler (D-N.Y.) — argues there is “overwhelming public interest” to release the contents of the high-profile report.

I haven't seen any such interest.

6 posted on 03/14/2019 10:23:59 AM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Any parts in any way casting aspersions on Trump will be in red, 36 point, bold, italicized, underline font.


7 posted on 03/14/2019 10:23:59 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

What does “nonbinding” mean in this context?


8 posted on 03/14/2019 10:24:28 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Does Mulehead even have a report? What will he do to live off the taxpayer dime once he files a report?


9 posted on 03/14/2019 10:24:42 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys all aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Finally, something they agree on.


10 posted on 03/14/2019 10:25:35 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sevlex

“Wow, a rare example of bi-partisanship.”

Remember that there was ZERO bi-partisanship in the House 2009-2017.

They were ALL accomplices to the Fraud’s crimes against America.


11 posted on 03/14/2019 10:26:19 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Lawmakers unanimously passed the nonbinding resolution in a 420-0 vote.

Non-binding resolution. Meaningless.

12 posted on 03/14/2019 10:26:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“What will he do to live off the taxpayer dime once he files a report?”
......

Hopefully he will have 10 years of taxpayer-funded meals at GITMO.


13 posted on 03/14/2019 10:27:33 AM PDT by sevlex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

They all believe Mueller is an honorable man, so this isn’t a surprise, unfortunately.


14 posted on 03/14/2019 10:28:13 AM PDT by JonPreston (If you think we're treated badly now wait untill we're disarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Let’s start a ticker and count (in seconds) how long after the “release” before various media agencies publish excerpts they find interesting (IE, negative to Trump).

I’m going to guess that even they don’t get leaked copies before the ‘release’, they will surely have pointers and hints sent to them by their many contacts in the ‘deep state’


15 posted on 03/14/2019 10:28:26 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

It’s a resolution. Not law. It’s like stating your opinion.


16 posted on 03/14/2019 10:28:42 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sevlex
Wow, a rare example of bi-partisanship.

Which means absolutely nothing-which is why they felt safe enough to vote for it.

The House doesn't get to decide to release it, I believe Wray has that honor (head of the DOJ?)

17 posted on 03/14/2019 10:28:43 AM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

I expect that, since day 1. Trump has dirt on Mulehead and he knows it.


18 posted on 03/14/2019 10:28:55 AM PDT by max americana (Fired libtards at our company for the past 12 yrs at every election. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
What does “nonbinding” mean in this context?

It has no force of law. It means that the report is made public only if the Attorney General allows it to be made public. Congress has no say in the matter.

19 posted on 03/14/2019 10:28:58 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Essentially non-binding means a recommendation and not a requirement. IOW, not law.


20 posted on 03/14/2019 10:29:32 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson