Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Looks like the RINOs (uniparty) are going to the wire against President Trump on this.
1 posted on 03/12/2019 4:15:07 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: jazusamo

F***ing despicable traitors.

Go to Hell, Mike Lee.

*spits*


33 posted on 03/12/2019 4:42:24 PM PDT by chris37 (No wall? No vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

...... Well .... My guess is that Most who are trying to stop Trump from keeping the US a Powerful and Sovereign Nation have signed on to the UN Agenda 2030 which is basically the UN’s Recipe for Global Socialism which is the power behind much of what is driving the Leftward race to Socialism ...


34 posted on 03/12/2019 4:43:42 PM PDT by R_Kangel ("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

no this is great. Trump gets to do it but future presidents can’t!! GREAT!!


35 posted on 03/12/2019 4:45:04 PM PDT by guyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Supposedly the republicans gained 2 or 3 Senate seats. But it appears as thought we lost a bunch.


38 posted on 03/12/2019 4:46:40 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

“Trump’s emergency declaration has sparked a widespread discussion among Senate Republicans about if they should change the National Emergencies Act. Though Republicans largely support Trump on border security they are concerned that a future Democratic president will use his precedent to force through issues like climate change or gun control.”

Obvious differences: building the wall is Constitutional, and it is lawful, and it is specifically appropriated and merely underfunded. Congress never reversed itself on the need for a wall; only the Democrats did.

Climate change executive orders under emergency declarations would be required to be lawful and Constitutional orders—something they never would be if they were not specifically authorized by Congress in the first place.

A declared emergency in which a future president attempts to confiscate guns would be unlawful AND unconstitutional.

Apples and oranges.


40 posted on 03/12/2019 4:51:00 PM PDT by unlearner (War is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Never underestimate an Anti-Trumper’s capacity for treatery and self-defeating stupidity (Paul Ryan as archetype).


42 posted on 03/12/2019 4:55:43 PM PDT by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

FKG Mormons!


44 posted on 03/12/2019 4:59:53 PM PDT by JME_FAN (If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

What a bunch of losers.

McConnell has already ascertained the House won’t have the votes to override a certain veto. So what’s the point?


45 posted on 03/12/2019 5:00:32 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Funny how these assholes are not concerned about the other THIRTY emergency declarations still in effect - or DACA for that matter. All these bastards need to be primaried - especially the Mormon retards.


46 posted on 03/12/2019 5:02:10 PM PDT by JME_FAN (If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Can you read? The article clearly states:

"Lee's legislation would not impact Trump's current emergency declaration on the wall but, if passed, would impact any future emergency declarations."

Lee and the others know Republicans won't always control the Executive. Pelosi's already threatened emergency action on gun control, and other Dems see an emergency declaration as a great way to enforce whatever nutty schemes they may have regarding global warming nonsense. I see this as forward-thinking legislation.

47 posted on 03/12/2019 5:02:28 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I h8 these people. I really do..
I mean REALLY


49 posted on 03/12/2019 5:03:48 PM PDT by smvoice (I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

None of the people he campaigned for.


56 posted on 03/12/2019 5:21:59 PM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Our nation ensures chaos, by allowing no executive decision making even for national emergency. GOP are dummies


57 posted on 03/12/2019 5:24:18 PM PDT by inchworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo; All


Less Than $308 To Go!!
If You Haven't Donated Yet This Quarter
Please Remember To Help
The FR FReepathon

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

58 posted on 03/12/2019 5:24:58 PM PDT by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
...make it easier for Congress to terminate future national emergency declarations...

Or…

If they were intellectually honest about this, they'd change the underlying law that allows redistribution of funds, or the law that authorizes emergency declarations.

But nooooooo…

They want to keep THOSE laws and just change the ability to rebuke a President for exercising them.

I can see a SCOTUS challenge that says that a law to override a declaration of emergency is unnecessary since Congress delegated the authority in the first place and has the power to decide the limits of that declaration at the outset.

They can't delegate the authority and then put backsies on it, otherwise it's not really a delegation. That would cripple a President who is trying to react to an emergency, if Congress is back-seat driving the President every step of the way.

The proper channel is to restrict the original delegation or revoke it entirely and force Congress to exercise the power themselves.

-PJ

60 posted on 03/12/2019 5:26:16 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I’ll make my calls and send emails tomorrow.


61 posted on 03/12/2019 5:28:50 PM PDT by rrrod (just an old guy with a gun in his pocket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The party of the Galactically Stupid!


62 posted on 03/12/2019 5:29:03 PM PDT by rwoodward ("god, guns and more ammo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

These repugnant useful idiots don’t seem to understand we’re in a war and that they are siding with the enemy.


69 posted on 03/12/2019 5:36:46 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Was it too broad back in the 70s when it was passed
no...the original had a legislative veto in it.
SCOTUS ruled in "INS v Chadha" legislative vetoes are unconstitutional.

so all laws with legislative vetoes had to be changed. The National Emergencies Act was on of the.

not sure how what they are proposing will stand up to scrutiny. In any case, would POTUS sign it into law ?
good luck with that .
71 posted on 03/12/2019 5:41:49 PM PDT by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

We will have to see if this was okayed in order to keep enough GOP Senators from voting against the current emergency declaration in front of them.


72 posted on 03/12/2019 5:47:56 PM PDT by georgiarat (The most expensive thing in the world is a cheap Army and Navy. - Carl Vinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson