Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP senators introduce bill to rein in president's emergency powers
The Hill ^ | March 12, 2019 | Jordain Carney

Posted on 03/12/2019 4:15:07 PM PDT by jazusamo

More than a dozen Republican senators introduced legislation on Tuesday that would make it easier for Congress to terminate future national emergency declarations, days before the chamber will vote on President Trump's.

The legislation, spearheaded by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), would require that Congress pass a resolution extending an emergency declaration after 30 days for it to continue, otherwise it would be terminated.

“If Congress is troubled by recent emergency declarations made pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, they only have themselves to blame. Congress gave these legislative powers away in 1976 and it is far past time that we as an institution took them back. If we don’t want our president acting like a king we need to start taking back the legislative powers that allow him to do so," Lee said in a statement. In addition to Lee, GOP Sens. Chuck Grassley (Iowa), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Joni Ernst (Iowa), Pat Toomey (Pa.), Ron Johnson (Wis.), Jerry Moran (Kansas), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Ben Sasse (Neb.), Roy Blunt (Mo.), Rob Portman (Ohio), Todd Young (Ind.), Mitt Romney (Utah), Ted Cruz (Texas) and Roger Wicker (Miss.) are supporting the legislation.

The legislation—known as the Assuring that Robust, Thorough, and Informed Congressional Leadership is Exercised Over National Emergencies, or ARTICLE ONE, Act—would be a significant change to the mechanism Congress has to block a national emergency declaration.

Currently, Congress has to pass a resolution of disapproval to block Trump's emergency declaration on constructing the U.S.-Mexico border wall. Trump is expected to veto the resolution and neither chambers are expected to be able to override that veto.

Trump's emergency declaration has sparked a widespread discussion among Senate Republicans about if they should change the National Emergencies Act. Though Republicans largely support Trump on border security they are concerned that a future Democratic president will use his precedent to force through issues like climate change or gun control.

Lee's legislation would not impact Trump's current emergency declaration on the wall but, if passed, would impact any future emergency declarations.

Senators are discussing changes to the emergency powers law with the White House but it's unclear if Trump would support reining in his own executive authority, and he's consistently bristled at attempts by Congress to force his hand on legislation.

Blunt, a member of GOP leadership, said that Trump had raised concerns about executive overreach by previous presidents and that supporting Lee's legislation would give him a chance to get back in line with his campaign rhetoric.

"Well the president had problems with a candidate with the Obama overreach, so he's been on record for some time on this topic," he said. "I think this will give him a chance to get back to where he was three years ago."

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters on Tuesday that Republican senators were looking at amending the law.

"We're looking at some ways to revisit the law. There's a lot of discomfort with the law. …Was it too broad back in the 70s when it was passed? So yeah, we're discussing altering that," McConnell told reporters during a weekly press conference.

Asked if he would support Lee's legislation, McConnell added that he "may well."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; bordersecurity; buildthewall; emergencydeclaration; emergencypowersact; illegalaliens; mcconnell; mikelee; presidenttrump; republican; trump; uniparty; ussenate; worthless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: jazusamo

We’re not going to be able to vote ourselves out of this mess boys and girls so harden your hearts and hone your skills.


21 posted on 03/12/2019 4:33:06 PM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Just proves that there are MANY in the GOP that want open borders..because they dont want to be in power, they would prefer the commie left control everything


22 posted on 03/12/2019 4:37:29 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Spineless weasels.


23 posted on 03/12/2019 4:37:49 PM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

Because going after Obama would have been racist and stuff, instead they bent over backwards kissing his ass


24 posted on 03/12/2019 4:37:57 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lovemysoldier

Yeah, we might as well vote for a Democrat because that’s what we get either way.


25 posted on 03/12/2019 4:38:06 PM PDT by Tejas Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

But when they had control of the House and Senate, they wouldn’t even TRY to pass anything like this. They would whine that Obama would veto any bills he didn’t like. I don’t want a Democrat President to have this kind of power, either, but you can bet if we had one, the dems would NEVER sign into a bill like this. Rinos only exert their power when it hurts conservatives.


26 posted on 03/12/2019 4:38:07 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It sounds like it was modelled on the War Powers Act.


27 posted on 03/12/2019 4:39:35 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

you trust Cruz? so you’re the one


28 posted on 03/12/2019 4:40:26 PM PDT by rintintin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bishop_Malachi

Their bill won’t affect this current national emergency.


29 posted on 03/12/2019 4:40:38 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bishop_Malachi

Their bill won’t affect this current national emergency.


30 posted on 03/12/2019 4:40:39 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bishop_Malachi

Their bill won’t affect this current national emergency.


31 posted on 03/12/2019 4:40:40 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The president doesn’t need anything but his inherent powers of Commander in Chief to DEFEND the nation.

Defending is not declaring war. It is deploying forces and capabilities to overcome an assault of any kind.


32 posted on 03/12/2019 4:42:02 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

F***ing despicable traitors.

Go to Hell, Mike Lee.

*spits*


33 posted on 03/12/2019 4:42:24 PM PDT by chris37 (No wall? No vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

...... Well .... My guess is that Most who are trying to stop Trump from keeping the US a Powerful and Sovereign Nation have signed on to the UN Agenda 2030 which is basically the UN’s Recipe for Global Socialism which is the power behind much of what is driving the Leftward race to Socialism ...


34 posted on 03/12/2019 4:43:42 PM PDT by R_Kangel ("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

no this is great. Trump gets to do it but future presidents can’t!! GREAT!!


35 posted on 03/12/2019 4:45:04 PM PDT by guyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

How is this bill helpful?

What if a president needs to declare an emergency that our dickwad congress doesn’t agree is an emergency?

Do we want to wait on congress to solve or do anything of importance whatsoever?


36 posted on 03/12/2019 4:45:24 PM PDT by chris37 (No wall? No vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: guyman

BUILD THE WALL NOW!!!


37 posted on 03/12/2019 4:46:31 PM PDT by guyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Supposedly the republicans gained 2 or 3 Senate seats. But it appears as thought we lost a bunch.


38 posted on 03/12/2019 4:46:40 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guyman
Trump gets to do it but future presidents can’t!! GREAT!!

Exactly.

39 posted on 03/12/2019 4:50:31 PM PDT by SamuraiScot (am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Trump’s emergency declaration has sparked a widespread discussion among Senate Republicans about if they should change the National Emergencies Act. Though Republicans largely support Trump on border security they are concerned that a future Democratic president will use his precedent to force through issues like climate change or gun control.”

Obvious differences: building the wall is Constitutional, and it is lawful, and it is specifically appropriated and merely underfunded. Congress never reversed itself on the need for a wall; only the Democrats did.

Climate change executive orders under emergency declarations would be required to be lawful and Constitutional orders—something they never would be if they were not specifically authorized by Congress in the first place.

A declared emergency in which a future president attempts to confiscate guns would be unlawful AND unconstitutional.

Apples and oranges.


40 posted on 03/12/2019 4:51:00 PM PDT by unlearner (War is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson