Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
Was it too broad back in the 70s when it was passed
no...the original had a legislative veto in it.
SCOTUS ruled in "INS v Chadha" legislative vetoes are unconstitutional.

so all laws with legislative vetoes had to be changed. The National Emergencies Act was on of the.

not sure how what they are proposing will stand up to scrutiny. In any case, would POTUS sign it into law ?
good luck with that .
71 posted on 03/12/2019 5:41:49 PM PDT by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

Agreed...Chances are slim to none that POTUS would sign it especially if they force a veto on the joint resolution.


73 posted on 03/12/2019 5:48:48 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson