Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

From yesterday but I didn't see this one posted. I don't recall much rebellion when Obama instituted the DACA program in a memo and not an executive order even though Congress had refused to fund it. And now the new administration isn't permitted by the Supreme Court to end DACA. The uni-party always has the majority.
1 posted on 03/01/2019 10:30:23 AM PST by Menehune56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Menehune56

Me to Alexander: Reconsider opposition to Trump or risk primary voter rebellion.


2 posted on 03/01/2019 10:31:41 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Lamar Alexander to Trump: Reconsider emergency declaration or risk GOP rebellion
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Trump to Lamar: Sit down and shut up, pussy.


3 posted on 03/01/2019 10:32:00 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

He just wants a few seconds of shameful publicity before he retires congress.


4 posted on 03/01/2019 10:32:26 AM PST by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Lamar

Consider changing your obstruction on behalf of open border billionaires or risk everybody telling your ilk to go to hell at the ballot box.


5 posted on 03/01/2019 10:32:44 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

“And now the new administration isn’t permitted by the Supreme Court to end DACA.”

The Supreme Court doesn’t rule over the Executive branch. Trump should just ignore them and instruct his subordinates to obey his instructions or be fired.


6 posted on 03/01/2019 10:32:57 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Drop dead Lamar.

Nobody cares what you think.

No really, NOBODY.

the truth hurts.

A gazillion people heading towards the border with one possibly carrying the next illness that will wipe out 1/2 of America, not to mention the rapists and MS13 members and on and on and on.

But it’s not a national emergency.

What exactly IS then?


7 posted on 03/01/2019 10:33:39 AM PST by dp0622 (The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

I am more than ready for the GOP to commit suicide by breaking from Trump on this.

The death of the GOP is long overdue.
Bring on the MAGA party!


8 posted on 03/01/2019 10:34:45 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

The Doublecross from the spineless Suthrun Democrat hiding in RINO clothing

F-Off Alexander, you either get on the team or LEAVE


10 posted on 03/01/2019 10:35:41 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Lamar was for a few moments seen as a possible successor to Reagan. This was back in 1988 or so, thirty years ago.

He never caught fire though, and I guess we know why.


11 posted on 03/01/2019 10:36:04 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Shut up Lamar.


12 posted on 03/01/2019 10:37:11 AM PST by pnz1 (#IMNOTWITHHER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Feckless twerp.


13 posted on 03/01/2019 10:37:18 AM PST by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Little late for that threat, aren’t we? The GOP has been shivving DJT from the get go.


14 posted on 03/01/2019 10:38:18 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Texas VOTER here to Mr. Lamar - It’s an invasion on our borders you damned idiot. Article 4, section 4 of our United States Constitution that YOU swore an oath to.


16 posted on 03/01/2019 10:39:19 AM PST by Made In The USA (Next thing you know, 'ol Jed's a millionaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Is there a brain eating virus spreading through Congress?

Good luck convincing me there isn’t.


17 posted on 03/01/2019 10:40:25 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

“or face a possible Republican rebellion”

Good. Then Trump can once again show the people how he’s really fighting both parties to do what’s best for the country.


18 posted on 03/01/2019 10:40:33 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

It sounds like little Lamar doesn’t think a foreign invasion of the U.S. is an emergency. He and his GOOB pals want to see a rebellion? Don’t do anything to stop the invasion. Americans have had enough. America is our home. It is not a “refugee” camp, an asylum or Job Corp work project.


19 posted on 03/01/2019 10:40:45 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56
the new administration isn't permitted by the Supreme Court to end DACA.

Not so - the Court merely declined to hear the adminisration's 9th Circuit-skipping appeal.

Four courts have stated that President Trump has the authority to end DACA as a policy decision ... the ball's in his court.

Regents of the University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security : "To be clear: we do not hold that DACA could not be rescinded as an exercise of Executive Branch discretion. We hold only that here, where the Executive did not make a discretionary choice to end DACA—but rather acted based on an erroneous view of what the law required—the rescission was arbitrary and capricious under settled law. The government is, as always, free to reexamine its policy choices"

Napolitano v DHS: "All agree that a new administration is entitled to replace old policies with new policies [...] the new administration didn’t terminate DACA on policy grounds. It terminated DACA over a point of law, a pithy conclusion that the agency had exceeded its statutory and constitutional authority."

Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen: "Defendants indisputably can end the DACA program. [...] The question before the court is thus not whether Defendants could end the DACA program, but whether they offered legally adequate reasons for doing so. Based on its review of the record before it, the court concludes that Defendants have not done so. First, the decision to end the DACA program appears to rest exclusively on a legal conclusion that the program was unconstitutional and violated the APA and INA."

NAACP v. Trump: "while immigration policies are generally “so exclusively entrusted to the political branches of government as to be largely immune from judicial inquiry or interference,” there are good reasons to scrutinize a policy more carefully when it is based solely on an agency’s reading of domestic statutory law."

23 posted on 03/01/2019 10:45:28 AM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Is this the bag of bones that I last saw holding up a flannel shirt? Back in the ‘80’s?


24 posted on 03/01/2019 10:46:45 AM PST by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Mr Lamar, reconsider spending all your efforts getting along with Democrats rather than keeping things like campaign promises or you may continue to experience the angst of Republicsn voters as you did last year.


26 posted on 03/01/2019 10:47:05 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Menehune56

Shaddup, Lamer. Resign already.


27 posted on 03/01/2019 10:47:37 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson