Posted on 02/28/2019 11:08:39 PM PST by knighthawk
Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle reportedly told friends that she wants to take a "fluid approach to gender" when raising her child.
Markle, 37, is said to have told the friends at her Wednesday royal baby shower in New York City that she is expecting a son, according to Vanity Fair.
“Meghan has been talking to some of her friends about the birth and how she and Harry plan to raise their baby. Her exact word was 'fluid,'" a source told the magazine. "She said they plan to raise their child with a fluid approach to gender and they won’t be imposing any stereotypes."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Take away her expense account.
Ms Markle seems quite feminine herself and is married to quite the military veteran prince. Their royal wedding was one big fat commercial for the institution of marriage.
Except she is a divorcee.
O holy moly. Clearly a person with no experience with children.
Who forces their baby or toddler to Be A Gender? I never have. But most kids naturally have their own preferences. Mostly along traditional gender lines, and those who don’t, are only fluid for a few years, then by kindergarten most kids do stick with typical gender playthings, colors, activities. And some don’t. It’s all good. Let them be kids. No need to “force” a gender or a fluidity. Let kids be themselves!
Sounds like pantaloons and ruffles will be making a comeback at court.
She’s NUTS; not to mention a narcissist, an attentionwhore, greedy, and yearns to be seen as just SO “with it”!
“Feminine”? Surly you jest; she dominates poor dim Harry.
Denying biological realities only results in confusion and suffering. I feel sorry for her child.
She is hot. She is also an idiot.
Harry choose poorly. I suspect the queen would agree.
Looks like the reputation of the Royal Family as dolts is in no danger of changing.
Don’t care for her politics or celebrity escapades but I think Meghan... both Duchesses for that matter (Kate and Meghan) are impressive as royals.
What a piece of Work
A RAGING QUEEN
Monty Python, always ahead of the curve.
So I see there is no minimum IQ required to marry a member of the royal family.
OMG. Harry couldn’t find a nice normal classy woman to marry? Only this wacko trash? I fear for the Queen’s health. I don’t want her, at her advanced age, to have to stress herself out with this hot mess on high heels.
Disagree that she is hot but fully agree with the rest.
She's a B-grade wanna-be actress who hit the jackpot romancing Harry. A washed-up soon to be old hag (You can do a lot with make-up these days) who thinks she can somehow live in the Left Coast liberal circles while meeting her responsibilities in the UK? Impossible.
She has butted heads with the Queen so many times already that it is only the fact that she is carrying the baby that prevents her from being banished.
The close friendship between the brothers, William and Harry, has been destroyed by this witch. Get the dunking chair ready along the Thames!!
Careful, Meghan. That family has a history of beheading its women for less. Just ask Anne Boleyn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.