Skip to comments.
Meghan Markle says she plans to raise child with 'fluid approach to gender': report
Fox News ^
| February 28 2019
| Amy Lieu
Posted on 02/28/2019 11:08:39 PM PST by knighthawk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 next last
To: knighthawk
What man would allow this kind of talk?
61
posted on
03/01/2019 3:30:28 AM PST
by
keat
To: knighthawk
Idiot—without the inbreeding.
62
posted on
03/01/2019 3:33:00 AM PST
by
jimbug
To: nopardons
I was hoping she'd be able to do it, with her acting background. Marrying into that royal family is accepting a role in a 24/7 performance. All she had to do is play that role, and she'd have been the most famous, beloved actress on earth.
What this does demonstrate is how narcissistic mildly successful people of her ilk have become.
Kate, Will, and their brood should stay far, far, away from this witch.
63
posted on
03/01/2019 3:41:14 AM PST
by
grania
("We're all just pawns in their game")
To: JudgemAll
Now she goes on to mutilate the genitalias of his/her own kids....
Isn't that jumping the gun a little. We don't even know if this is true.
64
posted on
03/01/2019 3:41:16 AM PST
by
x
To: nopardons
she dominates poor dim Harry.< Whipped with a kitty-cat.....
65
posted on
03/01/2019 3:42:31 AM PST
by
Vlad The Inhaler
(A.D. 636 Jerusalem Falls To Islam, A.D. 642 Christian Egypt Is Lost To Islam)
To: odawg; Yaelle
No, we dont really have a preference as to our gender. It is something that is confirmed at conception.
That doesn't make any sense. Clearly some people have their "preferences" in spite of what they were born biologically. What that means and what (if anything) should be done about it, I don't know, but one can't deny that people sometimes have wishes or desires that don't correspond to their physical type. Rachel Dolezal isn't Black, but she has her preference.
66
posted on
03/01/2019 3:45:50 AM PST
by
x
To: knighthawk
Well, there’s always the Princess Di treatment.
67
posted on
03/01/2019 4:52:29 AM PST
by
moovova
To: Jeff Chandler
The Windsors have never bred them for brains.
68
posted on
03/01/2019 4:58:22 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: knighthawk
When I hear people talk like this, I immediately have the impression they are brainwashed and shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near children.
69
posted on
03/01/2019 5:09:39 AM PST
by
rlmorel
(If racial attacks were as common as the Left wants you to think, they wouldn't have to make them up.)
To: the_daug
70
posted on
03/01/2019 5:10:37 AM PST
by
rlmorel
(If racial attacks were as common as the Left wants you to think, they wouldn't have to make them up.)
To: knighthawk
So if the kid wants to be all boy, she’s going to let him?
I doubt it.
I hope she has a very normal, male oriented, strong willed little boy who gives her heck.
71
posted on
03/01/2019 5:12:23 AM PST
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: LibWhacker
Careful, Meghan. That family has a history of beheading its women for less. Just ask Anne Boleyn.Wrong family. Henry VIII was a Tudor. Current house is Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (19011917) and Windsor (from 1917).
72
posted on
03/01/2019 5:14:28 AM PST
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: the_daug
73
posted on
03/01/2019 5:16:23 AM PST
by
rlmorel
(If racial attacks were as common as the Left wants you to think, they wouldn't have to make them up.)
To: Yaelle
The tomboys of old would be shoehorned into becoming butch dykes today. Wanting to play with the boys’ toys didn’t mean wanting to be a homosexual.
74
posted on
03/01/2019 5:19:25 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: knighthawk
One day their son can become queen.
75
posted on
03/01/2019 5:19:53 AM PST
by
gunnut
To: knarf
> And don’t try to tell me Almost Occasionally Conscious is ALSO not a hot little porn figure to look at.
She’s not, even though she clearly thinks she is.
The media is trying to sell this look, but I find it horribly masculine.
76
posted on
03/01/2019 5:20:02 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Nobody is coming to save the day)
To: knighthawk
She wants her son to be a Queen!
77
posted on
03/01/2019 5:23:48 AM PST
by
PGR88
To: Berlin_Freeper
Yes - Prince Harry is hubby #3
78
posted on
03/01/2019 5:25:12 AM PST
by
ladyjane
To: nopardons
Shes NUTS; not to mention a narcissist, an attentionwhore, greedy, and yearns to be seen as just SO with it! And those are her most positive points!
79
posted on
03/01/2019 5:26:18 AM PST
by
LouAvul
(Socialism is the logical conclusion of liberalism. Anarchy is the logical conclusion of socialism.)
To: knighthawk
Different religion
Different age
Different country
Different race
Controlling & selfish
Worst member of the Royal Family ever, she will make Fergie seem easy-peasy.
80
posted on
03/01/2019 5:40:15 AM PST
by
gaijin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson