Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

She has too much fluid in her head...
1 posted on 02/28/2019 11:08:39 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: knighthawk

Take away her expense account.


2 posted on 02/28/2019 11:14:15 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Ms Markle seems quite feminine herself and is married to quite the military veteran prince. Their royal wedding was one big fat commercial for the institution of marriage.


3 posted on 02/28/2019 11:14:43 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

O holy moly. Clearly a person with no experience with children.

Who forces their baby or toddler to Be A Gender? I never have. But most kids naturally have their own preferences. Mostly along traditional gender lines, and those who don’t, are only fluid for a few years, then by kindergarten most kids do stick with typical gender playthings, colors, activities. And some don’t. It’s all good. Let them be kids. No need to “force” a gender or a fluidity. Let kids be themselves!


5 posted on 02/28/2019 11:20:27 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Sounds like pantaloons and ruffles will be making a comeback at court.


6 posted on 02/28/2019 11:20:52 PM PST by davius (You can roll manure in powdered sugar but that don't make it a jelly doughnut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

She’s NUTS; not to mention a narcissist, an attentionwhore, greedy, and yearns to be seen as just SO “with it”!


7 posted on 02/28/2019 11:21:34 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Denying biological realities only results in confusion and suffering. I feel sorry for her child.


9 posted on 02/28/2019 11:24:06 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

She is hot. She is also an idiot.

Harry choose poorly. I suspect the queen would agree.


10 posted on 02/28/2019 11:24:26 PM PST by cpdiii ( canecutter, deckhand, roughneck, geologist, pilot, pharmacist THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Looks like the reputation of the Royal Family as dolts is in no danger of changing.


11 posted on 02/28/2019 11:25:05 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk


13 posted on 02/28/2019 11:29:19 PM PST by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
New era in Royalty:pay

A RAGING QUEEN

15 posted on 02/28/2019 11:32:09 PM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

So I see there is no minimum IQ required to marry a member of the royal family.


17 posted on 02/28/2019 11:39:01 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (We are in the midst of a Cold Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

OMG. Harry couldn’t find a nice normal classy woman to marry? Only this wacko trash? I fear for the Queen’s health. I don’t want her, at her advanced age, to have to stress herself out with this hot mess on high heels.


18 posted on 02/28/2019 11:42:21 PM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Careful, Meghan. That family has a history of beheading its women for less. Just ask Anne Boleyn.


20 posted on 02/28/2019 11:45:47 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

So then, would it be, the girl who would be king; the boy who would be queen; or the they who would be both???

(Apologies to Rudyard Kipling)


21 posted on 02/28/2019 11:46:04 PM PST by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I do not think that Her Majesty the Queen or the country at large will be quite so approving of “gender fluid” child-rearing. Who in their right mind raises a child to be sexually confused?


23 posted on 02/28/2019 11:50:30 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
We don't know that this is actually true.

If there is any truth in it, it may just mean not shoving a rugby ball in the baby's hands if it's a boy and fewer pink frilly things if it's a girl.

28 posted on 03/01/2019 12:08:57 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

That’s great ...but how are the nannies going to raise the kid?


29 posted on 03/01/2019 12:11:37 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

The Queen must be beside herself. Harry has brought a complete wackjob into their family.


32 posted on 03/01/2019 12:32:59 AM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

This is what happens when you invite trailer trash into the Royal family - I suspect she won’t be around long....


36 posted on 03/01/2019 12:50:44 AM PST by qwerty1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

It would be a shame if the child turned into an islamic trannie suicide bomber who then took her out.

Just terrible.


40 posted on 03/01/2019 1:07:41 AM PST by BTerclinger (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson