Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/27/2019 4:42:17 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Yeah the forefathers meant for you to only have your gun IN THE HOUSE.

So you could have your gun in one hand and your #### in the other.

Maybe they meant for free speech to only occur in the house. There is no logical reason to say the absurdity applies to one and not the other.

SMH


2 posted on 02/27/2019 4:47:37 AM PST by dp0622 (The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

—bflr—


3 posted on 02/27/2019 4:48:36 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
Thanks for the understandable update, I always have trouble understanding the legal trickery ... courts.
4 posted on 02/27/2019 4:54:33 AM PST by Navy Patriot (America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

“...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Case closed.


5 posted on 02/27/2019 4:59:23 AM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

[[This case, like others, deals with the Second Amendment right to carry a weapon, specifically a handgun, outside of the home. ]]

Where i the 2n’d A does it say you can’t carry outside the home?


6 posted on 02/27/2019 5:00:56 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
I'm no legal scholar so my focus on this particular case may be unwarranted but a year or two ago SCOTUS voted...9-0...to strike down a Massachusetts law which was a blatant and disgraceful violation of 2nd Amendment rights.

The case is called "Caetano v Massachusetts" and the argument that Massachusetts lawyers made,which was called "frivolous" in the SCOTUS ruling,was the very same one that the Massachusetts Supreme Court made in upholding the law before appeals reached the Federal courts.

8 posted on 02/27/2019 5:13:37 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Mitt Romney: Bringing Massachusetts Values To The Great State Of Utah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
To keep and bear arms

Shall not be infringed

12 posted on 02/27/2019 5:20:10 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Mitt Romney: Bringing Massachusetts Values To The Great State Of Utah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Too bad RBG isn’t gone and replaced by Trump. I don’t trust Roberts


14 posted on 02/27/2019 5:23:39 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...

RKBA Ping List


This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.

More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.

24 posted on 02/27/2019 6:26:11 AM PST by PROCON ('Progressive' is a Euphemism for Totalitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I thought the McDonald case established the right to bear arms outside the home? In fact, I believe it was the basis for forcing illanoy to finally enact concealed carry.


27 posted on 02/27/2019 6:50:06 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus" maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I’m encouraged with a Kavanaugh replacing Kennedy, but we can’t start to feel comfortable until President Trump gets to replace at least one of the Gang of Four. As it is now, anybody - like Roberts for example - getting the least bit wobbly can have disastrous consequences.


29 posted on 02/27/2019 6:58:58 AM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

For decades the leftist gun-grabbers have insisted that the 2nd applies only to organized militias.

So I guess they think militias operate only inside private homes.


34 posted on 02/27/2019 7:33:28 AM PST by sonjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

We’ve come a long way at destroying personal rights since the SCOTUS ruled, in 1857, that one of the rights of citizens is “To keep and carry arms wherever they went.”

This was the Dred Scott case in which it was “proven” that blacks in bondage were not citizens even if in a “free” state, so such rights did not apply to them.


36 posted on 02/27/2019 7:50:20 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson