Posted on 02/10/2019 6:55:32 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
President Trump poked fun at Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., Sunday for vowing to tackle climate change as she kicked off her 2020 presidential campaign in a snowy, freezing Minneapolis park.
"Well, it happened again," Trump wrote on Twitter Sunday evening. "Amy Klobuchar announced that she is running for President, talking proudly of fighting global warming while standing in a virtual blizzard of snow, ice and freezing temperatures. Bad timing. By the end of her speech she looked like a Snowman(woman)!"
Klobuchar previously endorsed the so-called "Green New Deal," a massive Democratic legislative program that promises to combat climate change, in part through a massive influx in spending. Republicans have decried it as unrealistic.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
That’s my point. Obama thinks he’s the standout in the unusual names department. He thinks every president was a George, John, James, or Richard, or some such. If “weird” names deterred voters, some of our greatest would never have been.
They are walking back all that craziness now; while they may still want those restrictions for us little people, they’ll never broadcast it on a website again.
So true; he had to make light of his name because people would understand all too clearly they were putting a Muslim in the White House if he didn’t.
We all learned a long time ago about the Dems——
Don’t —— trust —— them.
Websites will soon say: here are the goodies reserved for you, the bloc voter targeted today, if you vote Dem in 2020.
Their “compromises”, I predict, will be the earlier high water marks they used to dream of getting away with. So 99% cars gone when replaced by 75% of cars gone (so what would have been a shock now is a relief to people who hear of it. Strategy.)
If Dems want $2,000 more a year from each middle income person, they threaten “We’ll raise your taxes $10,000 a year.” Later, “No, a compromise was agreed to so we’ll raise your taxes only $2,000 a year.” Oh, boy. What a relief!
More revolting one: once we were so outraged to hear about babies born and then made the subject of mother and “health professionals” making a decision on whether or not to kill the baby if inconvenient or “threatening” to mental or physical health of the mother. Now, if that would be banned, then the Dems’ strategy of allowing any reason for a baby to be murdered by abortion up to the moment of birth will seem not as bad! Earlier that should have shocked all Americans but now will simply outrage pro-life people. Sick.
That’s right; they move the goalposts so far out, we end up with half the distance - and keep losing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.