Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut Dem introduces 50 percent tax on ammunition, calling it 'public health measure'
Fox News ^ | February 5, 2019 | Gregg Re

Posted on 02/05/2019 3:10:14 PM PST by jazusamo

A Democratic Connecticut state legislator introduced a bill on Monday that would raise the tax on ammunition in the state by 50 percent, prompting an immediate condemnation by the National Rifle Association (NRA) and concerns from legal observers that the legislation would be unconstitutional.

In a video uploaded to Twitter, Rep. Jillian Gilchrest, a freshman legislator from Hartford, said that a companion bill was being introduced in the state Senate by fellow freshman Democrat Will Haskell. (Haskell, at age 22, became Connecticut's youngest-ever elected legislator last year.)

"Currently, ammunition is taxed at the same rate as other products, but we want to increase it by 50 percent, because we see it as a prevention measure," Gilchrest says in the video. "For example, if someone were to buy a 50 cartridge box of ammunition, which goes for about $10, it would increase the price to $15."

Gilchrest goes on to explain that military and law enforcement members would be exempted from the tax, although those exemptions do not appear in an initial draft of the bill posted to the Connecticut state legislature's website.

"We see this as a public health measure, similar to what we've done in the state of Connecticut with increasing the tax on cigarettes," Gilchrest said. "When we increase that tax, we've seen a reduction in use."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; ammunitiontax; banglist; connecticut; democrats; gungrabbers; jilliangilchrest; nra; willhaskellage22
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: jazusamo
"When we increase that tax, we've seen a reduction in use."

Then they go on to complain about reduced tax revenue and look elsewhere for it.

21 posted on 02/05/2019 3:22:59 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Bump!


22 posted on 02/05/2019 3:23:54 PM PST by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger
You can never trust a liberal government to handle money.

You can never trust a government to handle money.

Fixed it!

23 posted on 02/05/2019 3:24:02 PM PST by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: jazusamo

How is this different from a poll tax, a tax created to discourage the exercise of a basic Constitutional right?


25 posted on 02/05/2019 3:28:13 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Sure sounds like a sure infringement.


26 posted on 02/05/2019 3:28:52 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

How long will the American people put up with this RAT BS?


27 posted on 02/05/2019 3:29:59 PM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Glad to see this... They made their beds, now sleep in it!


28 posted on 02/05/2019 3:30:06 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The good people of Connecticut better nip this one in the bud. Or in the future, they will rue the day that they did not.


29 posted on 02/05/2019 3:30:14 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Gilchrest goes on to explain that military and law enforcement members would be exempted from the tax

Which is unconstitutional as it is a violation of the 14th amendment's equal protection clause.

30 posted on 02/05/2019 3:30:19 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Where do the youth gangs get their bullets? Do they buy them legally somewhere?


31 posted on 02/05/2019 3:30:25 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Gilchrest goes on to explain that military and law enforcement members would be exempted from the tax,...

Some creatures are mire equal than others.

32 posted on 02/05/2019 3:31:08 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Disconnecticut.


33 posted on 02/05/2019 3:31:34 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Headine says 50% tax. Article says; "we want to increase it (the existing tax) by 50 percent". Two different things.
Neither good, but one way worse.
34 posted on 02/05/2019 3:33:57 PM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the Left, The truth is Right Wing Extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

“I figured there was a vagina involved in this.”

And a pussy.


35 posted on 02/05/2019 3:34:25 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Which is unconstitutional as it is a violation of the 14th amendment's equal protection clause.

I understand that, but at this point in time, the Constitution is not being adhered to. The Socialists [Democrats] invoke it only when it suits their goals. And to help them and hurt their enemies [us].

36 posted on 02/05/2019 3:35:42 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Hey, great idea..! The libturds pay more for their ammo... The cost of practice goes up.. sounds like a plan.. :)
The only problem being, you can deny no man his rights without losing your own.. :(
37 posted on 02/05/2019 3:38:23 PM PST by unread (Joe McCarthy was right.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

You can’t ban the guns because of the second amendment but the second amendment says nothing about the ammunition which is, in essence, the currency of gun activity. We’ve seen communities ask “how can we stop spree killers from causing so much violence at schools, concerts, churches, etc. while still respecting the gun owner’s right to own guns?”

The answer is to go after the ammo. Personally, I would want to make it cost prohibitive to buy exploding bullets and full-jacketed bullets that slice right through organs and bodies.

Why do buyers choose a Honda over a Mercedes? The answer is cost. If a Mercedes cost the same as an Accord, everyone would buy the Mercedes. In the same way, if you make the deadliest bullets the most expensive, some buyers will opt for the more cost-effective option.

No bill is going to prevent the next school shooting or the next whack-o from being able to shoot up a crowd but if you arm the shooter with fewer or less-damaging bullets, maybe the death toll from these events drops from the 20s to the 10s or single digits.

I know a lot of RKBA people will be upset with this but I would rather see the cost of ammo rise, particularly on the deadliest bullets, than more Leftist attempts to ban guns or watch more shooters open fire with a high kill rate because buying effective ammo was so cheap to get.

I don’t know the details of this particular bill and so often the devil is in the details but I am not against the concept of raising the tax on ammunition although I’d prefer the market itself raise the cost on the deadliest ammo.


38 posted on 02/05/2019 3:38:55 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Trump is Making the Media Grate Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So they truly are hypocrites. What a shock.

OK to have ammo they just want more tax revenue. Another shock.


39 posted on 02/05/2019 3:39:04 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just hava few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Currently, ammunition is taxed at the same rate as other products, but we want to increase it by 50 percent, because we see it as a prevention measure," Gilchrest says in the video. "For example, if someone were to buy a 50 cartridge box of ammunition, which goes for about $10, it would increase the price to $15."

A moron outing himself. If the present sales tax on "other products" is say 8 percent increasing it by 50 percent(he really meant to 50% but was too stupid to express himself correctly) would make it 12 percent.($11.20) He on the other hand wants a 50 percent tax and is too intellectually challenged to figure out how to explain it.

Turning libs loose with money is like giving your car keys to a drunk.Talking to one is like debating a stoner.

40 posted on 02/05/2019 3:39:29 PM PST by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson