Saving Private Lyin’ Media won’t be able to cover this one. 
Posted on 01/23/2019 9:47:30 AM PST by TigerClaws
As Twitchy reported, both The Washington Post and The New York Times have issued corrections, indicating that Nathan Phillips did not serve in Vietnam as he claimed.
When the first, edited clip of the Covington Catholic High School boys emerged, a lot of reporters relied on the reporting of Indian Country Today for their background on Phillips, and that’s likely where most news sources got the idea that Phillips was a Vietnam combat veteran.
Now, Indian Country Today is going all the way back to 2008 to correct an article in which Phillips described how he was spit on when he returned home from Vietnam.
Saving Private Lyin’ Media won’t be able to cover this one.
Per FR member Captain Rhino:
Looked at Chief’s video.
Couple of points for clarification about the pages shown from his service record book (SRB). (BTW, the Chief is connected, this info is definitely not from a DD 214. This is an actual scan of his assignments page.):
1. Rifleman for two days.
This is just an admin entry to put him back on to a Marine Corps unit’s rolls after he returned from his initial recruit training and MOS training. Likely this reserve rifle company was providing admin support for all Marine Corps Reserve (MCR) Marines living in the general Omaha area. He was probably joined on 721106 so he could liquidate his travel claim and get his regular pay. The rifleman designation is a default entry. Once they processed his paperwork, he is transferred (by another unit diary entry) the next day (721107) to a MCR aviation utility unit in Lincoln, Nebraska. That’s were he is going to do his weekend drills.
2. Hanging around Lincoln.
He is joined to Marine Wing Utility Squadron 4 (MWUS-4) the next day (721108). MWUS-4 is a place you would expect a refrigeration mechanic to be assigned. The extract shown in the video for this period has standard entries: annual entries for audits and an entry showing him going onto annual active duty for training (ATD) and coming off it 2 weeks later. The last entry we were shown is of his transfer in December 1973. Since we lack the next entry (being joined to the new unit), we should not read too much into this entry. The earlier DD-214 extract shows him not returning to active duty until August 1974, so he was still somewhere in the reserves, perhaps at a unit a little closer to home.
3. Then Something Happened.
In the normal course of events, a Reservist does initial active duty for recruit training and MOS training. (This can be split up if there are no school slots immediately available after completing recruit training.) When not on active duty, reservists drill one weekend a month with their unit and attend two weeks of active duty for training annually(ATD). This is the pattern for the 6-8 years of a typical reserve contract. If you break the contract (by not attending drill weekends or ATD, failing to maintain standards, etc.), you can be ordered to active duty. I am not certain but I also believe it is possible to request to be called to active duty so you can end your contracted period of service earlier. Given his subsequently less than stellar conduct, he was probably ordered to active duty for some significant infraction.
4. His first UA(AWOL) was the last straw for some CO.
The next assignment page entry the Chief shows us is in May 1975 (750519) when he is run to Unauthorized Absence (UA) status. (Absent Without Leave (AWOL) is entered so that the 30 day minimum clock on that offense is simultaneously started in case the Marine is gone longer than a month.) Two days later, 750521 he is sent to confinement (the Brig) for two months. He returns to duty on 750722. He was UA, according to the entries for one, maybe two days. Under normal circumstances, 2 days UA is not punished by two months in the brig. You get 2 months in the brig (usually along with being reduced in rank and fined) when your enlisted and officer leadership is finally, really, and truly feed up with your nonsense. At this point, he has been back on active duty a little less than a year. Imagine what has been going on to reach this point of exasperation with the private. Interestingly, when he goes UA for six days in September 1975, there is no confinement. He just goes back to duty. He is put in UA status again on 751206 but we don’t have any more entries to see how the offense was handled.
5. He may have “Bad Paper.”
What follows is speculation since his full SRB is not available to examine, but I suspect that he might have already been awaiting an administrative discharge or had been tried by a courts martial.
During the early and mid-1970s, the Marine Corps faced a crisis in the number of poor performing Marines it was having to process for discharge. (It was not the only service experiencing this problem.) This toleration of petty infractions sometimes was the case if the unit was being forced into carrying the Marine on its rolls while awaiting completion of the often considerable time required for the automatic review process by an overburdened military judicial system. This review is required when a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge is ordered as part of the sentence of a courts martial. At times during this period, this process was so long that a Marine would complete the confinement portion of their punishment and return to the unit to await the final administrative process. At that point, how much further punishment could be inflicted on someone who had essentially nothing left to lose? The resulting situation was essentially an uneasy truce between the unit and the Marine awaiting discharge. The unit didn’t unduly harass the Marine if the Marine was more or less conforming to expected minimum standards of performance and behavior. In return, the Marine had three squares a day, a place to sleep and bathe, got some portion of a private’s pay, and could go on liberty if he stayed out of/didn’t cause further trouble.
Later in the 70s, the Marine Corps would develop the “Expeditious Discharge Program,” which streamlined the discharge process and greatly shortened the time required from many months to often less than a month to discharge a poor performing/trouble making Marine. Real criminals, as always, continued to be tried and punished by courts martial.
It is unclear if there was or wasn’t a courts martial in his case because the DD-214 extract lists “Not on File” under Transcript of Courts Martial Trial. Considered in context, “Not on file” cannot be considered the equivalent of “N/A.”
On the other hand, the DD-214 simply states his duty status as “Discharged.” So, if there was no courts martial, he might have gone out the gate with a “General” or “Other Than Honorable” discharge based on his low proficiency and conduct marks.
A General discharge is the very best he could have left with because, as the Chief said, still a private after four years of service says something special - and it isn’t good - about the quality of your service.
Saving Private Lyin’ Media won’t be able to cover this one.
Phillips also mentioned his Vietnam service several times in a live CNN interview. It’s not just from the Indian Country Today newspaper.
bttt
Time for Chief Yellow Chicken to come clean. He has done nothing to serve his Country and the crazy weed has disintegrated his brain.
You wrote: “Transcript of Courts Martial Trial. Considered in context, “Not on file” cannot be considered the equivalent of “N/A.””
You are correct, additionally, under FOIA and the Privacy Act, courtsmartial transcripts/records are exempt from being released under Exemptions 6 and 7. I was as FOIA/Privacy Act officer for over a decade before I retired from the Department of the Army.
See:
FOIA — https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/oip/legacy/2014/07/23/foia-exemptions.pdf
Privacy Act — https://www.public.navy.mil/usff/foia/Documents/privacy_act_exemptions.pdf
I remember looking around me as a group of us new boots arrived and MCRD Diego and stood on the little yellow feet painted on the pavement.
A good many were let go within days, they couldn’t cut it or handle it, medically or mentally or physically.
I saw many that were as wasted away as he was and still is to this day. Those that could handle it grew and put on muscle and built their confidence in ways they never would have expected to in normal life.
And then, there were those like Nathan, who should never have been there, to them it was all a lark, no amount of training could instill a pride in them or their leaders.
The only combat they ever faced was in their own head.
Perhaps Chief Phillips needs to spend an evening at McP’s Irish Pub in Coronado. I am sure the op’s will make him feel really welcomed.
He did a couple of months in the brig?
The man’s a real hero.
There’s something else wrong because he’s been going by different names.
Thread slide... but it’s a good one. Thanks for the tip.
https://coronadotimes.com/news/2018/11/15/greg-mcpartlin-1949-2018/
I’m calling him Chief Drumstick.
(You still in HI?>
Injun tell heap big lie.
Does any tribe actually claim him or is he one of those fake indians that claim something they are not - like folkahauntus. Show us he papers.
According to a friend’s dad who was a DI:
In the mid-late 70’s, the military was trying to downsize at the same time people were trying to get into the military to stay out of trouble, whether medical or legal. So the military was funneling people into the Reserves while trying to find decent recruits. He said it was a rough time.
Nathan “Dances with Soros” Phillips has more in-brig time than in-country time! LOL!
He said he was a Marine who served in Vietnam from 1972-76. we withdrew from Vietnam in 1973 and the last Marine unit left in 1971. But the enemedia still ran with his story.
I was in the Army but have long known about Greg McPartlin’s Pub for many years. So sad to learn of his passing. What a great patriot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.