Posted on 01/02/2019 8:54:56 AM PST by george76
It was one of those heartstring-tugging, tear-jerking, carefully curated narratives about DREAMers we're supposed to read and then respond to with sympathy.
But a story that ran in the Los Angeles Times yesterday accidentally did more to raise questions about the issue of ballot-harvesting in California than any raving right-wing warning tome could ever do.
The Times describes how California's famed ballot-harvestors, who flipped places such as Orange County blue
...
foreign nationals voting, without any fear of prosecution. That changes the nature of the election, and in fact, the U.S. republic itself. Voting up until now has been a practice reserved for citizens.
Today, non-citizens vote, by getting hold of indifferent Americans, and filling in the ballots by proxy, no fingerprints visible. And who knows what kind of coercion may be employed by some of them.
And if DREAMers can do it to promote their own political agenda, what's to stop other foreigners - with far more malign agendas, from doing it? Shall a team of Russian or Chinese agents, or Arab terrorists, or Mexican cartels, be allowed in next to help harvest the ballots? (You know the Chinese are thinking about it). They're as foreign as DREAMers, and it would be perfectly legal under the current California law.
Ballot-harvesting, which is illegal in most states, makes this all possible. And what that means is that the House has been flipped in no small part by foreigners, who not only cast one ballot, they may have cast dozens and dozens of ballots, all from the advantages of ballot-harvesting.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
That hill was lost a long time ago, bud. Give it up.
Nope. Post #23. I’m not playing those games. I will not accept being willfully mislabeled by my opponents.
Well, go 'head on with your bad self. Wear your blue proudly.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Prior to 2000 election, blue was typically Republican, and red was typically Democrat, on the election maps.
The commiedia pushing Gore wised up, switched it en masse, and have, as usual, defined the terms and controlled the debate ever since.
Red: danger, warning, anger, hatred: Stop! A natural fit for the left, so they project it onto conservatives.
Blue: calm, reasonable, loyal, steady: Safe. A natural fit for the law-and-order, reliable, tax-paying right, so usurp it for communists.
Yes. It was rolled out on Election Day 2000. The GOP being the weak, gutless wonders we’ve come to love refused to call bull$hit on that absurd, false and obscene relabeling as the color of historical and international Communism/Socialism. I’ve called it out since day #1 and I refuse to use it. It’s as offensive as can be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.