Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects Trump plea (5-4 Roberts joins the liberals) to enforce asylum ban
AP ^

Posted on 12/21/2018 12:10:08 PM PST by springwater13

he Supreme Court won’t let the Trump administration begin enforcing a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border.

New Justice Brett Kavanaugh and three other conservative justices sided with the administration.

The court’s order Friday leaves in place lower court rulings that blocked President Donald Trump’s proclamation in November automatically denying asylum to people who enter the country from Mexico without going through official border crossings.

Trump said he was acting in response to caravans of migrants making their way to the border.

The administration had also complained that the nationwide order preventing the policy from taking effect was too broad.

But Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s four more liberal justices rejected the administration’s suggestion for narrowing it.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: abortion; brettkavanaugh; buildthefence; daca; diddlingbob; diddlingbobroberts; dreamact; dreamers; johnroberts; kiddiediddlerroberts; maga; scotus; smirkingchimpjudge; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-231 next last
To: AU72

They have something on him. We pretty much KNOW what it is.

When his kid is an adult, will he be out from under their thumb?


181 posted on 12/21/2018 4:10:30 PM PST by Ken Regis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
Ginsberg voted of course with the commie left from her hospital bed..I really hope it hurts I know thats mean but damn that b*tch

She may have "voted" in the same sense that John McCain Tweeted during his last months. Call me skeptical that she was reading legal documents while she was undergoing lung surgery.

She probably left a 6-year supply of signed blank opinion pages with her clerks.

182 posted on 12/21/2018 4:11:57 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Every nation gets the government it deserves." -Joseph de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

Even near death commies will do what commies do


183 posted on 12/21/2018 4:13:42 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Roberts has replaced Kennedy as the Justice who has been compromised by the left. What the hell do they know about him?


184 posted on 12/21/2018 4:14:10 PM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: relee

Could not agree more!


185 posted on 12/21/2018 4:32:26 PM PST by snuffy smiff (Build the Wall and build it tall, then build a gallows and hang them ALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
Consider the claims of these guest felons, but lock the criminals up in prison for illegally entering our country while we consider their “claims”. Then reject their demands for asylum and send the invaders home.

Given the circumstances -- I like it.

186 posted on 12/21/2018 5:37:15 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: fhayek; frank ballenger

“The Supreme Court swing vote is arguably the most powerful man in America. The lure of such power must be hard to resist.”

Why were liberals in government, media and on main street so concerned about a decent man becoming a Supreme Court Justice?:

Congress, Presidents, governors, legislatures, IRS/FBI/DOJ and all others set up potential possible judicial decisions, which are ALL Decided by the Supreme Court often by one vote by the Swing Justice.

Limbaugh estimates “80% of the leftist agenda stuffed into our culture was not voted on but rather was the result of the courts.”

Often by one vote.

*The federal circuit judges (HI,OR,CA especially), and the Supreme Court 5-4 decisions totally run our religious practice, life and death such as abortion, immigration and our borders, our sex lives and definitions of gender, and all types of private and public activity and taxation.

*Thanks to frank ballenger for clarifying the America, we have lived in since FDR.


187 posted on 12/21/2018 5:38:06 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Is Frau Mueller about to have the worse year, 2019, of its lying Deep State Life?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
we supposedly have laws against people coming into our country ILLEGALLY, but roberts thinks the laws shouldn’t be enforced?

Roberts children are illegal. No wonder he supports illegal.

188 posted on 12/21/2018 5:44:10 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Good question! How did Ginsburg hear the case while getting surgery “today”, recovering for 3 weeks?


189 posted on 12/21/2018 6:10:57 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (The democrats' national goal: One world social-communism under one world religion: Atheistic Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

FU USSC

Highest black-robed tyrants in the land. To hell with you lot.


190 posted on 12/21/2018 6:28:30 PM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

After the Iraq debacle, that has to be Dubya’s greatest blunder.


191 posted on 12/21/2018 6:48:38 PM PST by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

A family member suggested that it might have spread because of the surgery she had, re: pancreatic cancer.


192 posted on 12/21/2018 6:49:51 PM PST by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
The law IS clear, and Trump isn’t following it.
Wish the court had taken up and discussed the national security/law aspect .

Many here ahould see the conflict, but would rather invent conspiracies.
IMO if the admin had made a change for just the southern border where there is a prima facie national emergency we'd have a better ruling from the court.

193 posted on 12/21/2018 7:05:52 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
The law IS clear, and Trump isn’t following it.
Wish the court had taken up and discussed the national security/law aspect .

Many here ahould see the conflict, but would rather invent conspiracies.
IMO if the admin had made a change for just the southern border where there is a prima facie national emergency we'd have a better ruling from the court.

194 posted on 12/21/2018 7:05:54 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

Why isn’t this in the headlines on FR?


195 posted on 12/21/2018 7:22:30 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchaged our dreams for survival. We just ha va few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Buzzy may be dying as we speak.


196 posted on 12/21/2018 7:23:06 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchaged our dreams for survival. We just ha va few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

I really don’t know what they have on Roberts. There’s the obvious, but it’s so obvious that it can’t be their leverage point. What do they have on this guy? Or are older conservatives so blind they actually don’t know?


197 posted on 12/21/2018 7:37:37 PM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

The problem is they are illegally crossing the border between ports of entry. When they are caught doing that we cannot deport them back to Mexico because they are not Mexican citizens. We then have to process them for asylum in this country. Denying asylum to those who did that was to stop them from entering illegally. Now the judges have said even those that enter illegally can still claim asylum when they are caught.

We are trying to make them wait in Mexico to be processed but the USSC just said it was fine for them to just go ahead and enter illegally and they would be processed here, which also means they will end up being processed before those who are waiting in Mexico. That is not what the court said but that is what their ruling means here in the real world.


198 posted on 12/21/2018 7:47:38 PM PST by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jyo19

No, this was to deal with those who do not wait in Mexico to be processed at the border. Many decided not to wait but to just enter illegally between ports of entry. When they are caught here then they ask for asylum. Once they cross the border we cannot deport them to Mexico because they are not Mexican citizens. Trump’s plan was to say those who entered illegally would not be considered for asylum so they would stop entering illegally. The Supreme Court just ruled that cannot be done. Those that enter illegally have to be processed here for asylum. It actually rewards the illegals that enter illegally instead of waiting in Mexico.

So now you can bet most will not wait, and will enter illegally meaning we are back to processing them in this country. They have no reason to wait in Mexico now, in fact those that enter illegally will actually get processed faster than those that wait in Mexico.


199 posted on 12/21/2018 7:56:21 PM PST by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

as i said:

“A law without a punishment is only a slogan.”

it’s still ILLEGAL for people to cross our borders uninvited-


200 posted on 12/21/2018 8:04:42 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson