Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justices Roberts and Kavanaugh Betray Pro-Lifers. As Expected
Creative Minority Report ^ | December 10, 2018 | Matthew Archbold

Posted on 12/10/2018 4:38:46 PM PST by ebb tide

Justices Roberts and Kavanaugh Betray Pro-Lifers. As Expected

Come on. Who didn't see this coming?

After all the push and fighting pro-lifers did to make sure Robert Kavanaugh took a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court, how could we not have expected to be betrayed as soon as possible? Roberts is Roberts. I mean, that ship has sailed. He's on the organ donor waiting list for the first spine transplant.


CNN:
The Supreme Court Monday rebuffed efforts by states to block funding to Planned Parenthood.

It left in place two lower court opinions that said that states violate federal law when they terminate Medicaid contracts with Planned Parenthood affiliates who offer preventive care for low income women.
It would have taken four justices to agree to hear the issue, and only three conservative justices -- Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch -- voted to hear the case.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh appeared to side with the court's liberals in not taking up the case -- showing an effort to avoid high-profile abortion-related issues for now.

Roberts and Kavanaugh "likely have serious objections," said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. "But such votes seem to be a signal that they would rather avoid contentious, high-profile disputes for now, at least where possible."
Even CNN can't come up with some constitutionalist argument to support their pro-abort brethren. All they've got is that Roberts and Kavanaugh want to avoid "contentious, high profile disputes." Uhm, what did they think the Supreme Court did? Its actual role is to settle disputes of the contentious variety.

Justice Clarence Thomas pretty much called them wusses in his dissent. "What explains the Court's refusal to do its job here?" Thomas wrote.
"I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named Planned Parenthood."

I wrote a book called "Faith Under Fire: Dramatic Stories of Christian Courage." Let's just say these two wouldn't qualify.

So, it turns out that Planned Parenthood has a right to taxpayer money. At least until we see how that spine transplant turns out.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; contraception; kavanaugh; pp; ppjusticekavanaugh; ppjusticeroberts; ppjusticethomas; ppscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: kingu
Yes, yes, yes, however the State survey agency (SA) has the power to declare Medicare providers unqualified.

State Operations Manual, Chapter 3 is the process to determine if the provider is unqualified. Report is then sent to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for review.

To say the State has no oversight and control is asinine based on logistics alone, which is why SA works hand-in-hand with CMS.
61 posted on 12/10/2018 7:15:05 PM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

“Kavanaugh’s a Bush man”

And the Bush family voted for Hillary. They and their cohorts are vile.


62 posted on 12/10/2018 7:16:37 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Great things never come from comfort zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: quasimodo_79

Sodomy is a sin.


63 posted on 12/10/2018 7:22:43 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: quasimodo_79; TexasGurl24; ctdonath2; Revolutionary

The Supreme Court has just ruled in favor of homo “marriages”. That goes far beyond the “privacy of their own homes”.


64 posted on 12/10/2018 7:30:12 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“Sodomy is a sin.”

Yep, but the laws only applied to homosexual buggery, not heterosexual buggery. Buggery is buggery.


65 posted on 12/10/2018 7:30:23 PM PST by quasimodo_79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

No. You (and CNN) and the rest of the “concerned” crowd keep suggesting that this was a case about funding, when it wasn’t.


66 posted on 12/10/2018 7:32:02 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: TexasGurl24
No. You (and CNN) and the rest of the “concerned” crowd keep suggesting that this was a case about funding, when it wasn’t.

I have made no statement that this about funding, so please don't misrepresent what I have or have not said. As you stated earlier, "It was about whether an individual could bring a lawsuit in the first place."

And I have demonstrated the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of said lawsuits with the precedents of Roe vs Wade and Lawrence vs Texas. Funding was not an issue in either of those two rulings.

68 posted on 12/10/2018 7:44:06 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Roe and Lawrence will be overturned.


69 posted on 12/10/2018 7:45:38 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Roe and Lawrence will be overturned.

Not with Kavanaugh and Roberts on the court. I can't fathom why you're defending them.

70 posted on 12/10/2018 7:50:30 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Just because you want to be right, doesn’t make you right. You can’t fathom because you want to be “concerned”.


71 posted on 12/10/2018 7:56:04 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
You can’t fathom because you want to be “concerned”.

You're not "concerned" about the murder of millions of babies, regardless of "funding"?

Are you pro-life or pro-murder?

72 posted on 12/10/2018 8:04:39 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

You don’t get it. I want Roe overturned and I want abortion ended. I’m confident that will happen. It should happen today, but the court can’t magically overturn Roe with a case about standing.

You bought the CNN propaganda about this case and You are “concern” trolling about Kavanaugh and Roberts despite the fact that Roberts has voted pro-life on cases in the past and Kavanaugh hasn’t had a chance to vote.

This wasn’t a case about funding and it has nothing to do with overturning Roe. You want to pretend that it was because CNN said so so that you can cry like eeyore.

The right case to overturn Roe will come later. Kavanaugh and Roberts will vote to overturn.


73 posted on 12/10/2018 8:16:39 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; pookie18
Kavenaugh-drinking-beer
74 posted on 12/10/2018 8:17:14 PM PST by FrankR (Make America Great Again, and Keep It That Way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
The right case to overturn Roe will come later. Kavanaugh and Roberts will vote to overturn.

In your dreams. They both believe Roe vs Wade has set a precedent.

75 posted on 12/10/2018 8:27:31 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

One wonders if this is a technical ruling or not it would appear to me as such


76 posted on 12/10/2018 8:34:04 PM PST by thesligoduffyflynns (get off my lawn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
The dissent was significant because it indicates that Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the high court’s liberal wing to deny review of a lower court decision that favored the nation’s largest abortion provider.

“So what explains the Court’s refusal to do its job here?,” Thomas wrote. “I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood.’”

“Some tenuous connection to a politically fraught issue does not justify abdicating our judicial duty,” Thomas added. “If anything, neutrally applying the law is all the more important when political issues are in the background.”

[Read Justice Thomas’ dissent]

77 posted on 12/10/2018 9:00:51 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Kavanaugh hasn’t had a chance to vote.

He has just voted today: in favor of Planned Parenthood.

78 posted on 12/10/2018 9:11:43 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I agree that these two acted against our wishes.

Sadly, the House and Senate took a pass on passing legislation Trump was eager to sign, that would have defunded Planned Parenthood.

They also failed to act against PBS and NPR.

This last two years was to biggest failure to follow through in U. S. History.

McConnell, Ryan, F you two.


79 posted on 12/10/2018 9:13:02 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 frm 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

These same cast of traitors used the same bag of tricks to give us RINO flavored Obamacare.

The next time there is a flagrant “right wing” vs “left wing” dust up in the media, you know it is just the Uniparty Elites pulling the Hegelian strings for their man (or woman).

This time it was Kavanaugh, just another RINO Globalist.

They prey that we will “hate” the Left and the Left will “hate” the right and that’s how they get their man in office, every time.

Hegelian theory is an ancient practice.

Jesus described it.

It’s called divide and conquer.


80 posted on 12/10/2018 9:17:43 PM PST by Sontagged ("The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handiwork.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson