Posted on 12/08/2018 10:16:13 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
It’s a sad comment on the quality of “science” being conducted by supposedly reputable scientists.
Our cover story this week looks at promises made to the alcohol industry by researchers at the National Institutes of Health. According to documents, NIH promised positive results in advance of a major study on the benefits of moderate drinking. Once the researchers got caught, the study was cancelled but not before millions of our tax dollars were spent. We look at the internal emails.
We also have a story that looks into allegedly slanted science in the case of Monsanto’s weed killer Roundup. Lisa Fletcher examines documents that allegedly show the company used “ghostwriters” whereby the company conducted research, then published it under a different name to make it seem independent. Monsanto denies the practice but it has become common in research today.
We never waste your time rehashing stories you’ve already seen all week.
Watch us on TV or replays online anytime, livestream Sundays at 9:30a ET www.fullmeasure.news
“Sharyl has documentation.”
Insane people might think that.
You would certainly be an expert on insanity.
How ANYONE could think Sharyl Attkisson is a crazy leftist is beyond me. I can only guess you have never heard of her.
No.
I looked at the link here. And looked at her Wikipedia.
She seems to gave gone nuts.
She started out as CNN/CBS propagandist.
If the FDA says it’s good or bad, you must believe them even though they are for sale to the highest bidder.
Same thing happens with the “food pyramid.”
http://www.100thseed.org/health/your-food-pyramid-is-more-political-than-nutritional/
UN just said that all alcohol is bad.
But look at those who are on that panel.
I don’t believe anything any government-affiliated entity says.
You can’t go wrong assuming the truth is the opposite of what they say.
Now available: Sharyl's latest book Smear. Five stars!
Watch Sharyl host "Full Measure," a Sunday morning talk show on the Sinclair network. More info.
Want on or off this ping list of 50+ FReepers and counting? Just click Private Reply below and drop me a FReep mail.
bttt
Thanks for the ping.
If the FDA says it’s good or bad, you must believe them even though they are for sale to the highest bidder.
Same thing happens with the “food pyramid.”
http://www.100thseed.org/health/your-food-pyramid-is-more-political-than-nutritional/
******************************************************************************
That idiotic food pyramid was at odds with what I was taught about nutrition in High School. I always wondered why they couldn’t figure out why people were getting so fat.
Seemed obvious to me- Grandpa always used corn/grains to fatten up the cattle. There were even studies and articles about it back during the depression-curious researchers wondering why poor people weren’t skinny. Then came McGovern’s Committee and the Pyramids-Grain Lobby out did the meat Lobby maybe?
There was actually an episode of The Good Wife about the cheese industry and the food pyramid.
https://www.cbs.com/shows/the_good_wife/episodes/77728/
Thanks.
You’re welcome!
I think it is considered bad science because the leftists hire bad scientists to cook the experiments/studies.....
Where’s the nuts part.
I’m willing to learn, maybe I don’t know Attkisson like I thought I did. My impression of Sharyl Attkisson is she’s that one in a million journalist with the brains to resist the media cabal.
So let’s hear your explanation. Unless you accidentally posted to the wrong thread, it seems your comment was somewhere between retarded and simian.
The study never happened because it was discovered that the it was going to have a paid-for predetermined conclusion.
That’s not science.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.